基于证据和临床经验的 "使用 MCAT 或 MCAF 治疗多发性牙龈退缩缺陷的决策树"。

IF 1.1
Sofia Aroca, Giovanni Zucchelli, Giovanna Laura Di Domenico, Massimo de Sanctis
{"title":"基于证据和临床经验的 \"使用 MCAT 或 MCAF 治疗多发性牙龈退缩缺陷的决策树\"。","authors":"Sofia Aroca, Giovanni Zucchelli, Giovanna Laura Di Domenico, Massimo de Sanctis","doi":"10.11607/prd.7290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The multiple coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and the modified coronally advanced tunnel tech-nique (MCAT) are the most commonly used methods for treating multiple gingival recessions. However, treating multiple defects is very complex due to various biologic and anatomical factors, and there is no clear guideline on the major or minor determinants that influence surgical decisions. The aim of the present article is to discuss a decision tree to suggest to clinicians the most relevant anatomical factors to consider when evaluating the choice between an MCAT and an MCAF. In the proposed decision-making process, the first crucial step involves the evaluation of the interdental clinical attachment loss according to the new EFP/AAP classification. The next step is to assess the dimensions of the lateral keratinized tissue (LKT)-that is, the keratinized tissue located later-ally to the recession defect. When the amount of LKT is insufficient, the interdental papillae size, including base, height, and coronal width, must also be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"600-615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Tree for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects When Utilizing MCAT or MCAF Based on Evidence and Clinical Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Aroca, Giovanni Zucchelli, Giovanna Laura Di Domenico, Massimo de Sanctis\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/prd.7290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The multiple coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and the modified coronally advanced tunnel tech-nique (MCAT) are the most commonly used methods for treating multiple gingival recessions. However, treating multiple defects is very complex due to various biologic and anatomical factors, and there is no clear guideline on the major or minor determinants that influence surgical decisions. The aim of the present article is to discuss a decision tree to suggest to clinicians the most relevant anatomical factors to consider when evaluating the choice between an MCAT and an MCAF. In the proposed decision-making process, the first crucial step involves the evaluation of the interdental clinical attachment loss according to the new EFP/AAP classification. The next step is to assess the dimensions of the lateral keratinized tissue (LKT)-that is, the keratinized tissue located later-ally to the recession defect. When the amount of LKT is insufficient, the interdental papillae size, including base, height, and coronal width, must also be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"600-615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多冠进阶皮瓣(MCAF)和改良冠进阶隧道技术(MCAT)是治疗多发龈退缩最常用的方法。然而,由于各种生物和解剖学因素,治疗多种缺陷非常复杂,并且没有明确的指导方针来确定影响手术决定的主要或次要因素。本文的目的是讨论一个决策树,建议临床医生在评估MCAT和MCAF之间的选择时考虑最相关的解剖学因素。在建议的决策过程中,第一个关键步骤是根据新的EFP/AAP分类评估牙间临床附着丧失。下一步是评估外侧角化组织(LKT)的尺寸,即位于后侧凹陷缺陷的角化组织。当LKT量不足时,还必须评估牙间乳头的大小,包括基部、高度和冠状宽度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision Tree for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects When Utilizing MCAT or MCAF Based on Evidence and Clinical Experience.

The multiple coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and the modified coronally advanced tunnel tech-nique (MCAT) are the most commonly used methods for treating multiple gingival recessions. However, treating multiple defects is very complex due to various biologic and anatomical factors, and there is no clear guideline on the major or minor determinants that influence surgical decisions. The aim of the present article is to discuss a decision tree to suggest to clinicians the most relevant anatomical factors to consider when evaluating the choice between an MCAT and an MCAF. In the proposed decision-making process, the first crucial step involves the evaluation of the interdental clinical attachment loss according to the new EFP/AAP classification. The next step is to assess the dimensions of the lateral keratinized tissue (LKT)-that is, the keratinized tissue located later-ally to the recession defect. When the amount of LKT is insufficient, the interdental papillae size, including base, height, and coronal width, must also be evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信