非病理性颈部疼痛对医护人员三种不同头部姿势手部握力的影响:横断面研究设计。

Journal of Physical Therapy Science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1589/jpts.36.505
Salem F Alatawi
{"title":"非病理性颈部疼痛对医护人员三种不同头部姿势手部握力的影响:横断面研究设计。","authors":"Salem F Alatawi","doi":"10.1589/jpts.36.505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] To determine how different head-neck positions (HNPs) influence the hand grip strength (HGS) of medical personnel with non-pathological neck pain (NPNP). [Participants and Methods] A cross-sectional study recruited 46 healthcare professionals: 21 (45.7%) with NPNP and 25 (54.3%) without. A dynamometer, cervical range of motion, and visual analogue scale measured HGS, HNPs, and NPNPs. Participants were instructed to squeeze the handgrip dynamometer handle in 90-degree elbow flexion as much as possible from a seated position to measure HGS from the neutral head position (NHP), 40° head neck flexion (HFP40°), and 30° head neck extension (HEP30°). [Results] The mean HGS for the dominant hand in NHP, HFP40°, and HEP30° was 29.27 kg (± 9.03), 27.24 kg (± 9.08), and 26.37 kg (± 9.32), while for the non-dominant hand it was 27.45 kg (± 9.62), 25.23 kg (± 9.36), and 24.61 kg (± 10.17). There was no significant correlation between HNPs and HGS. However, the only significant difference was between dominant HGS in the NHP and non-dominant HGS in the HEP30°. [Conclusion] NPNP had no significant influence on HGS in any of the three HNPs for either hand. Future studies should include other HNPs and other potential variables such as age, gender, weight, and pain intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"36 9","pages":"505-512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of non-pathological neck pain on hand grip strength in healthcare practitioners across three different head positions: a cross-sectional study design.\",\"authors\":\"Salem F Alatawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1589/jpts.36.505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>[Purpose] To determine how different head-neck positions (HNPs) influence the hand grip strength (HGS) of medical personnel with non-pathological neck pain (NPNP). [Participants and Methods] A cross-sectional study recruited 46 healthcare professionals: 21 (45.7%) with NPNP and 25 (54.3%) without. A dynamometer, cervical range of motion, and visual analogue scale measured HGS, HNPs, and NPNPs. Participants were instructed to squeeze the handgrip dynamometer handle in 90-degree elbow flexion as much as possible from a seated position to measure HGS from the neutral head position (NHP), 40° head neck flexion (HFP40°), and 30° head neck extension (HEP30°). [Results] The mean HGS for the dominant hand in NHP, HFP40°, and HEP30° was 29.27 kg (± 9.03), 27.24 kg (± 9.08), and 26.37 kg (± 9.32), while for the non-dominant hand it was 27.45 kg (± 9.62), 25.23 kg (± 9.36), and 24.61 kg (± 10.17). There was no significant correlation between HNPs and HGS. However, the only significant difference was between dominant HGS in the NHP and non-dominant HGS in the HEP30°. [Conclusion] NPNP had no significant influence on HGS in any of the three HNPs for either hand. Future studies should include other HNPs and other potential variables such as age, gender, weight, and pain intensity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\"36 9\",\"pages\":\"505-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[目的] 确定不同的头颈位置(HNP)如何影响患有非病理性颈痛(NPNP)的医务人员的手部握力(HGS)。[参与者和方法] 一项横断面研究共招募了 46 名医护人员:21 人(45.7%)患有非病理性颈痛,25 人(54.3%)未患有非病理性颈痛。使用测力计、颈椎活动范围和视觉模拟量表测量 HGS、HNPs 和 NPNPs。参与者被要求从坐姿开始,在肘关节屈曲 90 度的情况下尽可能挤压手握测力计手柄,以测量中立头位(NHP)、头颈屈曲 40 度(HFP40 度)和头颈伸展 30 度(HEP30 度)的 HGS。[结果] 在 NHP、HFP40° 和 HEP30°姿势下,优势手的平均 HGS 分别为 29.27 千克(± 9.03)、27.24 千克(± 9.08)和 26.37 千克(± 9.32),而非优势手的平均 HGS 分别为 27.45 千克(± 9.62)、25.23 千克(± 9.36)和 24.61 千克(± 10.17)。HNPs 和 HGS 之间没有明显的相关性。然而,唯一的显著差异是 NHP 的优势 HGS 与 HEP30° 的非优势 HGS 之间的差异。[结论]在三种 HNP 中,NPNP 对任何一只手的 HGS 均无明显影响。未来的研究应包括其他 HNP 和其他潜在变量,如年龄、性别、体重和疼痛强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of non-pathological neck pain on hand grip strength in healthcare practitioners across three different head positions: a cross-sectional study design.

[Purpose] To determine how different head-neck positions (HNPs) influence the hand grip strength (HGS) of medical personnel with non-pathological neck pain (NPNP). [Participants and Methods] A cross-sectional study recruited 46 healthcare professionals: 21 (45.7%) with NPNP and 25 (54.3%) without. A dynamometer, cervical range of motion, and visual analogue scale measured HGS, HNPs, and NPNPs. Participants were instructed to squeeze the handgrip dynamometer handle in 90-degree elbow flexion as much as possible from a seated position to measure HGS from the neutral head position (NHP), 40° head neck flexion (HFP40°), and 30° head neck extension (HEP30°). [Results] The mean HGS for the dominant hand in NHP, HFP40°, and HEP30° was 29.27 kg (± 9.03), 27.24 kg (± 9.08), and 26.37 kg (± 9.32), while for the non-dominant hand it was 27.45 kg (± 9.62), 25.23 kg (± 9.36), and 24.61 kg (± 10.17). There was no significant correlation between HNPs and HGS. However, the only significant difference was between dominant HGS in the NHP and non-dominant HGS in the HEP30°. [Conclusion] NPNP had no significant influence on HGS in any of the three HNPs for either hand. Future studies should include other HNPs and other potential variables such as age, gender, weight, and pain intensity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信