同源交叉具有远端偏向性,是拟南芥第一代新全多倍体基因组不稳定的基础。

IF 9.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1111/nph.20095
Candida Nibau, Aled Evans, Holly King, Dylan Wyn Phillips, Andrew Lloyd
{"title":"同源交叉具有远端偏向性,是拟南芥第一代新全多倍体基因组不稳定的基础。","authors":"Candida Nibau, Aled Evans, Holly King, Dylan Wyn Phillips, Andrew Lloyd","doi":"10.1111/nph.20095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First-generation polyploids often suffer from more meiotic errors and lower fertility than established wild polyploid populations. One such example is the allopolyploid model species Arabidopsis suecica which originated c. 16 000 generations ago. We present here a comparison of meiosis and its outcomes in naturally evolved and first-generation 'synthetic' A. suecica using a combination of cytological and genomic approaches. We show that while meiosis in natural lines is largely diploid-like, synthetic lines have high levels of meiotic errors including incomplete synapsis and nonhomologous crossover formation. Whole-genome re-sequencing of progeny revealed 20-fold higher levels of homoeologous exchange and eightfold higher aneuploidy originating from synthetic parents. Homoeologous exchanges showed a strong distal bias and occurred predominantly in genes, regularly generating novel protein variants. We also observed that homoeologous exchanges can generate megabase scale INDELs when occurring in regions of inverted synteny. Finally, we observed evidence of sex-specific differences in adaptation to polyploidy with higher success in reciprocal crosses to natural lines when synthetic plants were used as the female parent. Our results directly link cytological phenotypes in A. suecica with their genomic outcomes, demonstrating that homoeologous crossovers underlie genomic instability in neo-allopolyploids and are more distally biased than homologous crossovers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homoeologous crossovers are distally biased and underlie genomic instability in first-generation neo-allopolyploid Arabidopsis suecica.\",\"authors\":\"Candida Nibau, Aled Evans, Holly King, Dylan Wyn Phillips, Andrew Lloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.20095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>First-generation polyploids often suffer from more meiotic errors and lower fertility than established wild polyploid populations. One such example is the allopolyploid model species Arabidopsis suecica which originated c. 16 000 generations ago. We present here a comparison of meiosis and its outcomes in naturally evolved and first-generation 'synthetic' A. suecica using a combination of cytological and genomic approaches. We show that while meiosis in natural lines is largely diploid-like, synthetic lines have high levels of meiotic errors including incomplete synapsis and nonhomologous crossover formation. Whole-genome re-sequencing of progeny revealed 20-fold higher levels of homoeologous exchange and eightfold higher aneuploidy originating from synthetic parents. Homoeologous exchanges showed a strong distal bias and occurred predominantly in genes, regularly generating novel protein variants. We also observed that homoeologous exchanges can generate megabase scale INDELs when occurring in regions of inverted synteny. Finally, we observed evidence of sex-specific differences in adaptation to polyploidy with higher success in reciprocal crosses to natural lines when synthetic plants were used as the female parent. Our results directly link cytological phenotypes in A. suecica with their genomic outcomes, demonstrating that homoeologous crossovers underlie genomic instability in neo-allopolyploids and are more distally biased than homologous crossovers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20095\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与成熟的野生多倍体相比,第一代多倍体往往存在更多的减数分裂错误,生育率也更低。约 16000 代前起源的拟南芥(Arabidopsis suecica)全多倍体模式种就是这样一个例子。我们在此结合细胞学和基因组学方法,对自然进化的拟南芥和第一代 "合成 "拟南芥的减数分裂及其结果进行了比较。我们发现,自然品系的减数分裂在很大程度上类似于二倍体,而合成品系的减数分裂错误率很高,包括不完全合成和非同源交叉的形成。对后代的全基因组重测序显示,合成亲本的同源交换水平高出 20 倍,非整倍体水平高出 8 倍。同源交换显示出强烈的远端偏向,主要发生在基因中,经常产生新的蛋白质变体。我们还观察到,当同源交换发生在倒置同源区时,会产生兆位级的 INDEL。最后,我们观察到在适应多倍体方面存在性别特异性差异的证据,当合成植物作为雌性亲本时,与天然品系的互交成功率更高。我们的研究结果将A. suecica的细胞学表型与其基因组结果直接联系起来,证明同源杂交是新多倍体基因组不稳定的原因,而且比同源杂交更具远端偏向性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Homoeologous crossovers are distally biased and underlie genomic instability in first-generation neo-allopolyploid Arabidopsis suecica.

First-generation polyploids often suffer from more meiotic errors and lower fertility than established wild polyploid populations. One such example is the allopolyploid model species Arabidopsis suecica which originated c. 16 000 generations ago. We present here a comparison of meiosis and its outcomes in naturally evolved and first-generation 'synthetic' A. suecica using a combination of cytological and genomic approaches. We show that while meiosis in natural lines is largely diploid-like, synthetic lines have high levels of meiotic errors including incomplete synapsis and nonhomologous crossover formation. Whole-genome re-sequencing of progeny revealed 20-fold higher levels of homoeologous exchange and eightfold higher aneuploidy originating from synthetic parents. Homoeologous exchanges showed a strong distal bias and occurred predominantly in genes, regularly generating novel protein variants. We also observed that homoeologous exchanges can generate megabase scale INDELs when occurring in regions of inverted synteny. Finally, we observed evidence of sex-specific differences in adaptation to polyploidy with higher success in reciprocal crosses to natural lines when synthetic plants were used as the female parent. Our results directly link cytological phenotypes in A. suecica with their genomic outcomes, demonstrating that homoeologous crossovers underlie genomic instability in neo-allopolyploids and are more distally biased than homologous crossovers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信