将中性粒细胞 CD64、C 反应蛋白和降钙素原作为脓毒症/败血症休克重症患者的预后标志物的连续趋势: 一项来自三级护理重症监护病房的前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Rupali Patnaik, Afzal Azim, Kritika Singh, Vikas Agarwal, Prabhaker Mishra, Banani Poddar, Mohan Gurjar, Shakti B Mishra
{"title":"将中性粒细胞 CD64、C 反应蛋白和降钙素原作为脓毒症/败血症休克重症患者的预后标志物的连续趋势: 一项来自三级护理重症监护病房的前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Rupali Patnaik, Afzal Azim, Kritika Singh, Vikas Agarwal, Prabhaker Mishra, Banani Poddar, Mohan Gurjar, Shakti B Mishra","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is evolving as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether serial trend of nCD64, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis/septic shock, as per Sepsis-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, observational single-center cohort study included 60 adult patients (age ≥18 years) with sepsis. Serial biomarker levels with SOFA score were measured at admission (day 0), on day 4, and on day 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 60 patients, 42 (70%) had septic shock. Biomarker levels at admission did not differ between patients with sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-seven patients survived and 23 were non-survivors by day 28. There was a significant fall in serial trend of all three biomarkers from admission till day 8 (Friedman <i>p</i> < 0.001) in survivors compared to a non-significant change in non-survivors. On multivariate analysis, SOFA score at admission (OR 1.731), more days with vasopressor support (OR 1.077), rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (OR 1.074), and rise in CRP from day 0 to 8 (OR 1.245) were the significant predictors of 28-day mortality (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The highest area under the ROC curve was obtained for more days of vasopressor therapy (0.857), followed by a rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (0.798).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serial trend of biomarkers has prognostic utility. The rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 was a good predictor of mortality compared to the trend of other biomarkers.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Patnaik R, Azim A, Singh K, Agarwal V, Mishra P, Poddar B, <i>et al</i>. Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):777-784.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU.\",\"authors\":\"Rupali Patnaik, Afzal Azim, Kritika Singh, Vikas Agarwal, Prabhaker Mishra, Banani Poddar, Mohan Gurjar, Shakti B Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is evolving as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether serial trend of nCD64, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis/septic shock, as per Sepsis-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, observational single-center cohort study included 60 adult patients (age ≥18 years) with sepsis. Serial biomarker levels with SOFA score were measured at admission (day 0), on day 4, and on day 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 60 patients, 42 (70%) had septic shock. Biomarker levels at admission did not differ between patients with sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-seven patients survived and 23 were non-survivors by day 28. There was a significant fall in serial trend of all three biomarkers from admission till day 8 (Friedman <i>p</i> < 0.001) in survivors compared to a non-significant change in non-survivors. On multivariate analysis, SOFA score at admission (OR 1.731), more days with vasopressor support (OR 1.077), rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (OR 1.074), and rise in CRP from day 0 to 8 (OR 1.245) were the significant predictors of 28-day mortality (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The highest area under the ROC curve was obtained for more days of vasopressor therapy (0.857), followed by a rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (0.798).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serial trend of biomarkers has prognostic utility. The rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 was a good predictor of mortality compared to the trend of other biomarkers.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Patnaik R, Azim A, Singh K, Agarwal V, Mishra P, Poddar B, <i>et al</i>. Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):777-784.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和背景:中性粒细胞 CD64(nCD64)正逐渐成为脓毒症的预后生物标志物。本研究的主要目的是评估 nCD64、降钙素原(PCT)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)的序列趋势是否能预测脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者 28 天的死亡率(根据脓毒症-3 标准):这项前瞻性、观察性单中心队列研究纳入了 60 名脓毒症成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)。在入院时(第0天)、第4天和第8天测量序列生物标志物水平和SOFA评分:结果:60 名患者中,42 人(70%)患有脓毒性休克。脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者入院时的生物标志物水平没有差异。截至第 28 天,37 名患者存活,23 名患者未存活。从入院到第 8 天,存活患者的三种生物标志物均呈明显下降趋势(弗里德曼 p < 0.001),而非存活患者则无明显变化。在多变量分析中,入院时的 SOFA 评分(OR 1.731)、使用血管加压支持的天数(OR 1.077)、CD64 从第 0 天到第 8 天的升高(OR 1.074)以及 CRP 从第 0 天到第 8 天的升高(OR 1.245)是 28 天死亡率的重要预测因素(P < 0.05)。血管加压治疗天数越多,ROC曲线下面积越大(0.857),其次是CD64从第0天到第8天的升高(0.798):结论:生物标志物的序列趋势具有预后作用。结论:生物标志物的序列趋势具有预后作用,与其他生物标志物的趋势相比,CD64从第0天到第8天的上升是预测死亡率的良好指标:Patnaik R, Azim A, Singh K, Agarwal V, Mishra P, Poddar B, et al. 中性粒细胞CD64、C反应蛋白和降钙素原作为重症脓毒症/败血症休克患者预后标志物的序列趋势:一项来自三级重症监护病房的前瞻性观察研究。Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):777-784.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU.

Aim and background: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is evolving as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether serial trend of nCD64, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis/septic shock, as per Sepsis-3 criteria.

Materials and methods: This prospective, observational single-center cohort study included 60 adult patients (age ≥18 years) with sepsis. Serial biomarker levels with SOFA score were measured at admission (day 0), on day 4, and on day 8.

Results: Of the 60 patients, 42 (70%) had septic shock. Biomarker levels at admission did not differ between patients with sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-seven patients survived and 23 were non-survivors by day 28. There was a significant fall in serial trend of all three biomarkers from admission till day 8 (Friedman p < 0.001) in survivors compared to a non-significant change in non-survivors. On multivariate analysis, SOFA score at admission (OR 1.731), more days with vasopressor support (OR 1.077), rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (OR 1.074), and rise in CRP from day 0 to 8 (OR 1.245) were the significant predictors of 28-day mortality (p < 0.05). The highest area under the ROC curve was obtained for more days of vasopressor therapy (0.857), followed by a rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (0.798).

Conclusion: Serial trend of biomarkers has prognostic utility. The rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 was a good predictor of mortality compared to the trend of other biomarkers.

How to cite this article: Patnaik R, Azim A, Singh K, Agarwal V, Mishra P, Poddar B, et al. Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):777-784.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信