在衣原体和淋病服务评估中使用五类伴侣类型分类,突出了有针对性地通知伴侣以改善性传播感染控制的机会。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Beth Louise McMahon, Erna Buitendam, Merle Symonds, Claudia S Estcourt, John Saunders
{"title":"在衣原体和淋病服务评估中使用五类伴侣类型分类,突出了有针对性地通知伴侣以改善性传播感染控制的机会。","authors":"Beth Louise McMahon, Erna Buitendam, Merle Symonds, Claudia S Estcourt, John Saunders","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Partner notification (PN) is a key component of sexually transmitted infection control. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV guidelines now recommend partner-centred PN outcomes using a five-category partner classification (established, new, occasional, one-off, sex worker). We evaluated the reporting of partner-centred PN outcomes in two contrasting UK sexual health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the electronic patient records of 40 patients with a positive gonorrhoea test and 180 patients with a positive chlamydia test, we extracted PN outcomes for the five most recent sexual contacts within the appropriate lookback period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>180 patients with chlamydia reported 262 partners: 220 were contactable (103 established, 9 new, 43 occasional, 52 one-off, 13 unknown/unrecorded). 40 patients with gonorrhoea reported 88 partners: 53 were contactable (7 established, 1 new, 14 occasional, 10 one-off and 21 unknown/not recorded). No sex worker partners were reported. Most established partners of people with chlamydia (96/103) or gonorrhoea (7/7) were notified but fewer (60/103 and 6/7, respectively) attended for testing. Of those, 39 had a positive chlamydia test and two had a positive gonorrhoea test. For both chlamydia and gonorrhoea, most occasional and new partners were reported to be notified but there was a sharper decline in those tested. For both infections, one-off partners had the lowest rates of accessing services and testing. For chlamydia, 81% were notified (42/52), 23% accessed services (12/52) and 21% tested (11/52). However, 91% of those tested were positive (10/11). The number of contactable one-off gonorrhoea contacts was small and few attended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring partner-centred PN outcomes was feasible. There were differences in partner engagement with PN between the different infections and partner types. If these findings are replicated in larger samples, it suggests that interventions to target one-off partners who have low rates of PN engagement yet high levels of positivity could play a key role in reducing infection at population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of a five-category partner-type classification within a chlamydia and gonorrhoea service evaluation highlights opportunities for targeted partner notification to improve STI control.\",\"authors\":\"Beth Louise McMahon, Erna Buitendam, Merle Symonds, Claudia S Estcourt, John Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Partner notification (PN) is a key component of sexually transmitted infection control. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV guidelines now recommend partner-centred PN outcomes using a five-category partner classification (established, new, occasional, one-off, sex worker). We evaluated the reporting of partner-centred PN outcomes in two contrasting UK sexual health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the electronic patient records of 40 patients with a positive gonorrhoea test and 180 patients with a positive chlamydia test, we extracted PN outcomes for the five most recent sexual contacts within the appropriate lookback period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>180 patients with chlamydia reported 262 partners: 220 were contactable (103 established, 9 new, 43 occasional, 52 one-off, 13 unknown/unrecorded). 40 patients with gonorrhoea reported 88 partners: 53 were contactable (7 established, 1 new, 14 occasional, 10 one-off and 21 unknown/not recorded). No sex worker partners were reported. Most established partners of people with chlamydia (96/103) or gonorrhoea (7/7) were notified but fewer (60/103 and 6/7, respectively) attended for testing. Of those, 39 had a positive chlamydia test and two had a positive gonorrhoea test. For both chlamydia and gonorrhoea, most occasional and new partners were reported to be notified but there was a sharper decline in those tested. For both infections, one-off partners had the lowest rates of accessing services and testing. For chlamydia, 81% were notified (42/52), 23% accessed services (12/52) and 21% tested (11/52). However, 91% of those tested were positive (10/11). The number of contactable one-off gonorrhoea contacts was small and few attended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring partner-centred PN outcomes was feasible. There were differences in partner engagement with PN between the different infections and partner types. If these findings are replicated in larger samples, it suggests that interventions to target one-off partners who have low rates of PN engagement yet high levels of positivity could play a key role in reducing infection at population level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:性伴侣通知(PN)是性传播感染控制的关键组成部分。英国性健康和 HIV 协会指南目前建议采用五类性伴侣分类法(已建立性伴侣关系、新性伴侣关系、偶尔性伴侣关系、一次性性伴侣关系、性工作者性伴侣关系)来实现以性伴侣为中心的 PN 结果。我们对英国两家不同的性健康服务机构报告以伴侣为中心的 PN 结果进行了评估:利用 40 名淋病检测呈阳性的患者和 180 名衣原体检测呈阳性的患者的电子病历,我们提取了在适当的回溯期内最近五次性接触的 PN 结果:180 名衣原体感染患者报告了 262 个性伴侣:220 人可联系(103 人已建立联系、9 人新建立联系、43 人偶尔联系、52 人一次性联系、13 人不详/未记录)。40 名淋病患者报告有 88 个性伴侣:53 个可联系(7 个已建立、1 个新建立、14 个偶尔建立、10 个一次性建立、21 个未知/未记录)。没有性工作者伴侣的报告。大多数衣原体感染者(96/103)或淋病患者(7/7)的固定伴侣都得到了通知,但接受检测的人数较少(分别为 60/103 和 6/7)。其中,39 人衣原体检测呈阳性,2 人淋病检测呈阳性。就衣原体和淋病而言,大多数偶尔出现的伴侣和新伴侣都被告知接受了检测,但接受检测的人数却急剧下降。就这两种感染而言,一次性伴侣接受服务和检测的比例最低。就衣原体而言,81%的人得到通知(42/52),23%的人获得服务(12/52),21%的人接受检测(11/52)。然而,91%的检测结果呈阳性(10/11)。可接触的一次性淋病接触者人数很少,而且很少有人参加:结论:衡量以伴侣为中心的 PN 结果是可行的。不同感染和伴侣类型的伴侣参与 PN 的情况存在差异。如果这些研究结果能在更大的样本中得到验证,那么针对PN参与率低但阳性率高的一次性性伴侣的干预措施就能在减少人群感染方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of a five-category partner-type classification within a chlamydia and gonorrhoea service evaluation highlights opportunities for targeted partner notification to improve STI control.

Objectives: Partner notification (PN) is a key component of sexually transmitted infection control. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV guidelines now recommend partner-centred PN outcomes using a five-category partner classification (established, new, occasional, one-off, sex worker). We evaluated the reporting of partner-centred PN outcomes in two contrasting UK sexual health services.

Methods: Using the electronic patient records of 40 patients with a positive gonorrhoea test and 180 patients with a positive chlamydia test, we extracted PN outcomes for the five most recent sexual contacts within the appropriate lookback period.

Results: 180 patients with chlamydia reported 262 partners: 220 were contactable (103 established, 9 new, 43 occasional, 52 one-off, 13 unknown/unrecorded). 40 patients with gonorrhoea reported 88 partners: 53 were contactable (7 established, 1 new, 14 occasional, 10 one-off and 21 unknown/not recorded). No sex worker partners were reported. Most established partners of people with chlamydia (96/103) or gonorrhoea (7/7) were notified but fewer (60/103 and 6/7, respectively) attended for testing. Of those, 39 had a positive chlamydia test and two had a positive gonorrhoea test. For both chlamydia and gonorrhoea, most occasional and new partners were reported to be notified but there was a sharper decline in those tested. For both infections, one-off partners had the lowest rates of accessing services and testing. For chlamydia, 81% were notified (42/52), 23% accessed services (12/52) and 21% tested (11/52). However, 91% of those tested were positive (10/11). The number of contactable one-off gonorrhoea contacts was small and few attended.

Conclusions: Measuring partner-centred PN outcomes was feasible. There were differences in partner engagement with PN between the different infections and partner types. If these findings are replicated in larger samples, it suggests that interventions to target one-off partners who have low rates of PN engagement yet high levels of positivity could play a key role in reducing infection at population level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信