在远程神经学用户和不同人群中观察到的多发性硬化症患者直接使用医疗服务的趋势。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1177/13524585241272948
Kaitlyn N Palmer, Daniel Ontaneda, Tucker Harvey, Elizabeth S Mearns, Anisha M Patel, Nikki Win, Bryan R Cobb, Stephen Roush, Marisa P McGinley
{"title":"在远程神经学用户和不同人群中观察到的多发性硬化症患者直接使用医疗服务的趋势。","authors":"Kaitlyn N Palmer, Daniel Ontaneda, Tucker Harvey, Elizabeth S Mearns, Anisha M Patel, Nikki Win, Bryan R Cobb, Stephen Roush, Marisa P McGinley","doi":"10.1177/13524585241272948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of teleneurology on healthcare utilization (HCU) in MS is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the association between teleneurology and HCU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective longitudinal analysis of HCU among adult MS and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients residing in the Cleveland/Akron area from July 2020 to July 2022. Negative binomial regression models evaluated the association between number of laboratory and MRI orders per visit and number of emergency visits per patient across patient groups with variable proportions of teleneurology visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3208 patients completed 15,795 visits. Patients using teleneurology had more visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.707-1.719, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Teleneurology visits had fewer laboratory (RR 0.571) and MRI orders (RR 0.693, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in emergency care utilization for teleneurology patients (<i>p</i> ⩾ 0.05). More emergency visits were observed in Black (RR 1.414) and Medicaid (RR 1.893) patients, regardless of visit type (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Teleneurology visits were associated with fewer orders, suggesting teleneurology may be incorporated into healthcare models without increasing utilization related to the visit. Teleneurology was also associated with increased visit volumes but no difference in emergency HCU. More studies are needed to clarify the ultimate impact of teleneurology on overall HCU. More emergency visits, regardless of visit type, were observed among at-risk populations, warranting further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1350-1362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in direct healthcare utilization observed for persons with MS among teleneurology users and diverse populations.\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn N Palmer, Daniel Ontaneda, Tucker Harvey, Elizabeth S Mearns, Anisha M Patel, Nikki Win, Bryan R Cobb, Stephen Roush, Marisa P McGinley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585241272948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of teleneurology on healthcare utilization (HCU) in MS is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the association between teleneurology and HCU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective longitudinal analysis of HCU among adult MS and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients residing in the Cleveland/Akron area from July 2020 to July 2022. Negative binomial regression models evaluated the association between number of laboratory and MRI orders per visit and number of emergency visits per patient across patient groups with variable proportions of teleneurology visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3208 patients completed 15,795 visits. Patients using teleneurology had more visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.707-1.719, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Teleneurology visits had fewer laboratory (RR 0.571) and MRI orders (RR 0.693, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in emergency care utilization for teleneurology patients (<i>p</i> ⩾ 0.05). More emergency visits were observed in Black (RR 1.414) and Medicaid (RR 1.893) patients, regardless of visit type (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Teleneurology visits were associated with fewer orders, suggesting teleneurology may be incorporated into healthcare models without increasing utilization related to the visit. Teleneurology was also associated with increased visit volumes but no difference in emergency HCU. More studies are needed to clarify the ultimate impact of teleneurology on overall HCU. More emergency visits, regardless of visit type, were observed among at-risk populations, warranting further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1350-1362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241272948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241272948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程神经学对多发性硬化症患者医疗保健利用率(HCU)的影响尚不清楚:评估远程神经学与 HCU 之间的关联:2020年7月至2022年7月,对居住在克利夫兰/阿克伦地区的成年多发性硬化症和临床孤立综合征(CIS)患者的HCU进行回顾性纵向分析。负二项回归模型评估了不同患者组每次就诊的实验室和核磁共振成像订单数量与急诊就诊数量之间的关联,这些患者组的远程神经科就诊比例各不相同:共有 3208 名患者完成了 15,795 次就诊。使用远程神经科的患者就诊次数更多(比率比 (RR) 1.707-1.719,p < 0.001)。远程神经科就诊的化验单(RR 0.571)和核磁共振成像单(RR 0.693,P < 0.001)较少。远程神经科患者的急诊使用率没有差异(P ⩾0.05)。无论就诊类型如何,黑人(RR 1.414)和医疗补助(RR 1.893)患者的急诊就诊率更高(p < 0.001):远程神经病学就诊与较少的医嘱有关,这表明远程神经病学可以纳入医疗保健模式,而不会增加就诊相关的使用率。远程神经病学也与就诊量增加有关,但与急诊HCU没有区别。需要进行更多研究,以明确远程神经学对整体 HCU 的最终影响。在高危人群中观察到更多的急诊就诊,无论就诊类型如何,都值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in direct healthcare utilization observed for persons with MS among teleneurology users and diverse populations.

Background: The impact of teleneurology on healthcare utilization (HCU) in MS is unknown.

Objective: Evaluate the association between teleneurology and HCU.

Methods: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of HCU among adult MS and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients residing in the Cleveland/Akron area from July 2020 to July 2022. Negative binomial regression models evaluated the association between number of laboratory and MRI orders per visit and number of emergency visits per patient across patient groups with variable proportions of teleneurology visits.

Results: A total of 3208 patients completed 15,795 visits. Patients using teleneurology had more visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.707-1.719, p < 0.001). Teleneurology visits had fewer laboratory (RR 0.571) and MRI orders (RR 0.693, p < 0.001). There was no difference in emergency care utilization for teleneurology patients (p ⩾ 0.05). More emergency visits were observed in Black (RR 1.414) and Medicaid (RR 1.893) patients, regardless of visit type (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Teleneurology visits were associated with fewer orders, suggesting teleneurology may be incorporated into healthcare models without increasing utilization related to the visit. Teleneurology was also associated with increased visit volumes but no difference in emergency HCU. More studies are needed to clarify the ultimate impact of teleneurology on overall HCU. More emergency visits, regardless of visit type, were observed among at-risk populations, warranting further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信