椅子座椅前倾角度对改善坐姿任务中上肢灵活性的影响:一项试点研究。

Journal of Physical Therapy Science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1589/jpts.36.471
Kouji Iwamoto, Shouta Kataoka, Kenichi Kobara, Junya Hirata, Yasuyuki Nagata, Hisashi Takahashi, Daisuke Fujita
{"title":"椅子座椅前倾角度对改善坐姿任务中上肢灵活性的影响:一项试点研究。","authors":"Kouji Iwamoto, Shouta Kataoka, Kenichi Kobara, Junya Hirata, Yasuyuki Nagata, Hisashi Takahashi, Daisuke Fujita","doi":"10.1589/jpts.36.471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the influence of seat-forward tilt angles on improving upper limb dexterity in seated tasks and to contribute to the development of seating strategies. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen healthy men (age, 20.0 ± 0.5 years; height, 175.1 ± 4.9 cm; and body weight, 63.8 ± 6.7 kg) participated in this study. The forward tilt angles of the seat were set at 0°, 15°, and 30°, with knee pads used in all conditions. The Purdue Pegboard task was used to assess upper limb dexterity, with participants inserting pins into holes in the board for 60 s. Additionally, a visual analog scale was used to evaluate the perceived ease of the task. [Results] The Purdue Pegboard task scores were 30.0 ± 2.5, 30.6 ± 2.7, and 32.5 ± 2.9 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. The visual analog scale scores were 75.3 ± 9.8, 76.4 ± 14.6, and 84.1 ± 11.1 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. Both measurements showed significantly higher values under the 30° condition than under the other two conditions. [Conclusion] These results suggest that a tilt angle of 30° provides the most significant ease and upper limb dexterity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"36 9","pages":"471-475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of chair seat forward tilt angle on upper limb dexterity improvement in seated tasks: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Kouji Iwamoto, Shouta Kataoka, Kenichi Kobara, Junya Hirata, Yasuyuki Nagata, Hisashi Takahashi, Daisuke Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1589/jpts.36.471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the influence of seat-forward tilt angles on improving upper limb dexterity in seated tasks and to contribute to the development of seating strategies. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen healthy men (age, 20.0 ± 0.5 years; height, 175.1 ± 4.9 cm; and body weight, 63.8 ± 6.7 kg) participated in this study. The forward tilt angles of the seat were set at 0°, 15°, and 30°, with knee pads used in all conditions. The Purdue Pegboard task was used to assess upper limb dexterity, with participants inserting pins into holes in the board for 60 s. Additionally, a visual analog scale was used to evaluate the perceived ease of the task. [Results] The Purdue Pegboard task scores were 30.0 ± 2.5, 30.6 ± 2.7, and 32.5 ± 2.9 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. The visual analog scale scores were 75.3 ± 9.8, 76.4 ± 14.6, and 84.1 ± 11.1 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. Both measurements showed significantly higher values under the 30° condition than under the other two conditions. [Conclusion] These results suggest that a tilt angle of 30° provides the most significant ease and upper limb dexterity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\"36 9\",\"pages\":\"471-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374174/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[目的] 本研究旨在探讨座椅前倾角度对改善坐姿任务中上肢灵活性的影响,并为制定座椅策略做出贡献。[参与者和方法] 17 名健康男性(年龄,20.0 ± 0.5 岁;身高,175.1 ± 4.9 厘米;体重,63.8 ± 6.7 千克)参加了本研究。座椅的前倾角度设定为 0°、15° 和 30°,所有条件下均使用护膝。普渡钉板任务用于评估上肢灵活性,参与者需在 60 秒内将针插入钉板上的孔中。[结果] 在 0°、15° 和 30°条件下,普渡钉板任务得分分别为 30.0 ± 2.5、30.6 ± 2.7 和 32.5 ± 2.9。在 0°、15° 和 30°条件下,视觉模拟量表得分分别为 75.3 ± 9.8、76.4 ± 14.6 和 84.1 ± 11.1。这两项测量结果表明,30°条件下的数值明显高于其他两种条件下的数值。[结论]这些结果表明,倾斜角度为 30°时,上肢的轻松程度和灵活性最为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of chair seat forward tilt angle on upper limb dexterity improvement in seated tasks: a pilot study.

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the influence of seat-forward tilt angles on improving upper limb dexterity in seated tasks and to contribute to the development of seating strategies. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen healthy men (age, 20.0 ± 0.5 years; height, 175.1 ± 4.9 cm; and body weight, 63.8 ± 6.7 kg) participated in this study. The forward tilt angles of the seat were set at 0°, 15°, and 30°, with knee pads used in all conditions. The Purdue Pegboard task was used to assess upper limb dexterity, with participants inserting pins into holes in the board for 60 s. Additionally, a visual analog scale was used to evaluate the perceived ease of the task. [Results] The Purdue Pegboard task scores were 30.0 ± 2.5, 30.6 ± 2.7, and 32.5 ± 2.9 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. The visual analog scale scores were 75.3 ± 9.8, 76.4 ± 14.6, and 84.1 ± 11.1 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. Both measurements showed significantly higher values under the 30° condition than under the other two conditions. [Conclusion] These results suggest that a tilt angle of 30° provides the most significant ease and upper limb dexterity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信