胃肠道内窥镜检查后使用镇静和镇痛药安全出院:系统性文献综述。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0899
Marianna Spinou, Eleni Kyvelou, Giorgos Aggelopoulos, Dimitrios Ι Ziogas, Antonia Panagaki, Magdalini Manti, Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Antonio Facciorusso, Nikoletta Mathou, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Konstantina D Paraskeva, Antonios Vezakis, Ioannis Vlachogiannakos, George Karamanolis, Georgios Tziatzios
{"title":"胃肠道内窥镜检查后使用镇静和镇痛药安全出院:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Marianna Spinou, Eleni Kyvelou, Giorgos Aggelopoulos, Dimitrios Ι Ziogas, Antonia Panagaki, Magdalini Manti, Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Antonio Facciorusso, Nikoletta Mathou, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Konstantina D Paraskeva, Antonios Vezakis, Ioannis Vlachogiannakos, George Karamanolis, Georgios Tziatzios","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sedation and analgesia during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy increase procedural quality, contributing at the same time to greater patient satisfaction and willingness to undergo the procedure. Although sedation use has been optimized by the advent of efficacious and safe medications, data regarding the minimal criteria for discharge after outpatient endoscopy remain scant. Moreover, the time of discharge after endoscopy can be highly variable, depending not only on the type of procedure and anesthesia administered, but also on postprocedural complications and the patient's comorbidities. To make things even more conflicting, there is neither consensus among various endoscopic societies, concerning the most appropriate discharge strategy, nor a universally established tool that could be incorporated into everyday clinical practice, allowing patients' safe discharge as well as ability to drive. In this context, we conducted a systematic review, aiming to summarize the evidence regarding the available discharge scoring systems after outpatient GI endoscopy with sedation and analgesia administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 5","pages":"499-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe outpatient discharge after gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation and analgesia: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Marianna Spinou, Eleni Kyvelou, Giorgos Aggelopoulos, Dimitrios Ι Ziogas, Antonia Panagaki, Magdalini Manti, Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Antonio Facciorusso, Nikoletta Mathou, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Konstantina D Paraskeva, Antonios Vezakis, Ioannis Vlachogiannakos, George Karamanolis, Georgios Tziatzios\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2024.0899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sedation and analgesia during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy increase procedural quality, contributing at the same time to greater patient satisfaction and willingness to undergo the procedure. Although sedation use has been optimized by the advent of efficacious and safe medications, data regarding the minimal criteria for discharge after outpatient endoscopy remain scant. Moreover, the time of discharge after endoscopy can be highly variable, depending not only on the type of procedure and anesthesia administered, but also on postprocedural complications and the patient's comorbidities. To make things even more conflicting, there is neither consensus among various endoscopic societies, concerning the most appropriate discharge strategy, nor a universally established tool that could be incorporated into everyday clinical practice, allowing patients' safe discharge as well as ability to drive. In this context, we conducted a systematic review, aiming to summarize the evidence regarding the available discharge scoring systems after outpatient GI endoscopy with sedation and analgesia administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"499-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃肠道(GI)内窥镜检查期间的镇静和镇痛可提高手术质量,同时提高患者的满意度和接受手术的意愿。虽然镇静剂的使用因高效安全药物的出现而得到优化,但有关门诊内镜检查后出院的最低标准的数据仍然很少。此外,内窥镜检查后的出院时间变化很大,不仅取决于手术和麻醉的类型,还取决于术后并发症和患者的合并症。更矛盾的是,各内镜学会之间既没有就最合适的出院策略达成共识,也没有一个普遍认可的工具可用于日常临床实践,以确保患者安全出院并具备驾驶能力。在这种情况下,我们进行了一次系统性回顾,旨在总结有关门诊消化内镜术后镇静和镇痛的现有出院评分系统的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safe outpatient discharge after gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation and analgesia: a systematic literature review.

Sedation and analgesia during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy increase procedural quality, contributing at the same time to greater patient satisfaction and willingness to undergo the procedure. Although sedation use has been optimized by the advent of efficacious and safe medications, data regarding the minimal criteria for discharge after outpatient endoscopy remain scant. Moreover, the time of discharge after endoscopy can be highly variable, depending not only on the type of procedure and anesthesia administered, but also on postprocedural complications and the patient's comorbidities. To make things even more conflicting, there is neither consensus among various endoscopic societies, concerning the most appropriate discharge strategy, nor a universally established tool that could be incorporated into everyday clinical practice, allowing patients' safe discharge as well as ability to drive. In this context, we conducted a systematic review, aiming to summarize the evidence regarding the available discharge scoring systems after outpatient GI endoscopy with sedation and analgesia administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信