哪些健康的社会决定因素对社区肿瘤学促进患者护理公平和改善健康结果影响最大?范围综述。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70160
Kayleigh R. Majercak, Emily F. Gorman, Nicholas J. Robert, Barbara Palmer, Henry Asante Antwi, C. Daniel Mullins
{"title":"哪些健康的社会决定因素对社区肿瘤学促进患者护理公平和改善健康结果影响最大?范围综述。","authors":"Kayleigh R. Majercak,&nbsp;Emily F. Gorman,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Robert,&nbsp;Barbara Palmer,&nbsp;Henry Asante Antwi,&nbsp;C. Daniel Mullins","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>To better understand the SDOH-health equity landscape within a community oncology setting to answer the research question, “Which SDOH can have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes?”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework was used to identify evidence related to SDOH and health equity in community oncology. The study was guided by the “10-Step Framework for Continuous Patient Engagement” and a Community Advisory Board to assure relevance to patients and community providers. Literature was retrieved from literary databases and oncology organizations' websites. Eligible studies included discussion of SDOH and health equity as outlined by the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, respectively, and involved community oncology/cancer care in outpatient settings. Studies were excluded if the SDOH-health equity relationship was not discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The review resulted in 61 exploratory and 17 confirmatory “intervention” studies addressing the impact of SDOH on health equity in community oncology settings. The most frequently SDOH-health equity pairs identified were the SDOH categories, <i>social inclusion and non-discrimination</i>, <i>income and social protection,</i> and <i>structural conflict,</i> all paired with the health equity category, <i>access to care/treatment</i>. Confirmatory studies focused on <i>income and social protection</i> (SDOH) and <i>access to care/treatment</i> (health equity); the SDOH categories, <i>social inclusion and non-discrimination</i> and <i>health/general literacy–patient,</i> paired with the health equity category, and <i>adherence/compliance</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Literature highlights the SDOH and health equity relationship within the realm of oncology. Most studies on SDOH/health inequities in the community oncology setting are exploratory. There is the need to shift from documentation of cancer inequities to implementing solutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70160","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which social determinants of health have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes? A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Kayleigh R. Majercak,&nbsp;Emily F. Gorman,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Robert,&nbsp;Barbara Palmer,&nbsp;Henry Asante Antwi,&nbsp;C. Daniel Mullins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>To better understand the SDOH-health equity landscape within a community oncology setting to answer the research question, “Which SDOH can have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes?”</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework was used to identify evidence related to SDOH and health equity in community oncology. The study was guided by the “10-Step Framework for Continuous Patient Engagement” and a Community Advisory Board to assure relevance to patients and community providers. Literature was retrieved from literary databases and oncology organizations' websites. Eligible studies included discussion of SDOH and health equity as outlined by the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, respectively, and involved community oncology/cancer care in outpatient settings. Studies were excluded if the SDOH-health equity relationship was not discussed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The review resulted in 61 exploratory and 17 confirmatory “intervention” studies addressing the impact of SDOH on health equity in community oncology settings. The most frequently SDOH-health equity pairs identified were the SDOH categories, <i>social inclusion and non-discrimination</i>, <i>income and social protection,</i> and <i>structural conflict,</i> all paired with the health equity category, <i>access to care/treatment</i>. Confirmatory studies focused on <i>income and social protection</i> (SDOH) and <i>access to care/treatment</i> (health equity); the SDOH categories, <i>social inclusion and non-discrimination</i> and <i>health/general literacy–patient,</i> paired with the health equity category, and <i>adherence/compliance</i>.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Literature highlights the SDOH and health equity relationship within the realm of oncology. Most studies on SDOH/health inequities in the community oncology setting are exploratory. There is the need to shift from documentation of cancer inequities to implementing solutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70160\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:为了更好地了解社区肿瘤学环境中的SDOH-健康公平状况,以回答研究问题:"哪些SDOH可以对社区肿瘤学产生最大影响,从而促进患者护理公平并改善健康结果?"方法:采用Arksey和O Malley的范围综述框架,确定社区肿瘤学中与SDOH和健康公平相关的证据:采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的范围综述框架来确定与社区肿瘤学中的 SDOH 和健康公平相关的证据。研究以 "患者持续参与十步框架 "和社区咨询委员会为指导,以确保与患者和社区提供者的相关性。文献从文学数据库和肿瘤学组织的网站中检索。符合条件的研究包括对世界卫生组织和美国疾病控制与预防中心分别提出的 SDOH 和健康公平的讨论,并涉及门诊环境中的社区肿瘤学/癌症护理。如果未讨论 SDOH 与健康公平之间的关系,则排除研究:审查结果:61 项探索性 "干预 "研究和 17 项确认性 "干预 "研究涉及 SDOH 对社区肿瘤学环境中健康公平的影响。最常见的 SDOH 与健康公平之间的关系是 SDOH 类别、社会包容和非歧视、收入和社会保障以及结构性冲突,所有这些都与健康公平类别、获得护理/治疗相匹配。确认性研究侧重于收入和社会保护(SDOH)以及获得护理/治疗(健康公平);SDOH 类别、社会包容和非歧视以及健康/一般扫盲--患者,与健康公平类别和坚持/遵守配对:文献强调了肿瘤学领域中 SDOH 与健康公平之间的关系。大多数关于社区肿瘤学环境中 SDOH/健康不平等的研究都是探索性的。有必要从记录癌症不公平现象转向实施解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Which social determinants of health have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes? A scoping review

Which social determinants of health have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes? A scoping review

Introduction

To better understand the SDOH-health equity landscape within a community oncology setting to answer the research question, “Which SDOH can have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes?”

Methods

Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework was used to identify evidence related to SDOH and health equity in community oncology. The study was guided by the “10-Step Framework for Continuous Patient Engagement” and a Community Advisory Board to assure relevance to patients and community providers. Literature was retrieved from literary databases and oncology organizations' websites. Eligible studies included discussion of SDOH and health equity as outlined by the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, respectively, and involved community oncology/cancer care in outpatient settings. Studies were excluded if the SDOH-health equity relationship was not discussed.

Results

The review resulted in 61 exploratory and 17 confirmatory “intervention” studies addressing the impact of SDOH on health equity in community oncology settings. The most frequently SDOH-health equity pairs identified were the SDOH categories, social inclusion and non-discrimination, income and social protection, and structural conflict, all paired with the health equity category, access to care/treatment. Confirmatory studies focused on income and social protection (SDOH) and access to care/treatment (health equity); the SDOH categories, social inclusion and non-discrimination and health/general literacy–patient, paired with the health equity category, and adherence/compliance.

Conclusions

Literature highlights the SDOH and health equity relationship within the realm of oncology. Most studies on SDOH/health inequities in the community oncology setting are exploratory. There is the need to shift from documentation of cancer inequities to implementing solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信