Ryan Schultz , Antonio Pio Rinaldi , Philippe Roth , Herfried Madritsch , Thanushika Gunatilake , Stefan Wiemer
{"title":"瑞士特吕利孔二氧化碳注入诱发地震风险预筛查","authors":"Ryan Schultz , Antonio Pio Rinaldi , Philippe Roth , Herfried Madritsch , Thanushika Gunatilake , Stefan Wiemer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Successful carbon injection operations depend critically on the management of risks, like induced seismicity. Here, we consider the bowtie risk management framework to organize pre-screening efforts around a prospective CO<sub>2</sub> injection operation near Trüllikon, Switzerland. First, potential barriers/threats are appraised via a literature review of the regional seismotectonics, hydrogeology, and nearby induced seismicity cases – which suggests a natural propensity for earthquakes because of the proximity to the Neuhausen Fault and a lack of effective underlying hydrogeological barriers. Next, we engineer barriers to fault reactivation by quantifying the fault slip potential. The closest (∼700 m) and most susceptible (∼3.0 km) portions of the Neuhausen Fault would require ∼1.7 MPa and ∼0.47 MPa for reactivation, respectively. The most susceptible (unknown) faults are normal slip (168° strike) that require ∼0.23 MPa for reactivation. Injection simulations indicate pressure changes on Neuhausen Fault segments of 0.01–0.05 MPa – values that are 1–2 orders-of-magnitude smaller than those needed for fault reactivation. These engineered barriers limit the potential for fault reactivation. However, if these barriers prove totally ineffective, we have also designed a traffic light protocol as a reactive mitigation measure. Forecast estimates of nuisance, damage, and fatalities are used to infer the last-possible stopping-point based on a comparison with operation-ending risks encountered at Basel and St. Gallen. This indicates a red- and yellow-lights of M<sub>W</sub> ∼2.0 and M<sub>W</sub> ∼0.0, respectively. We synthesize these disparate pre-screening analyses to recommend performance targets for real-time seismic monitoring. Future CO<sub>2</sub> operations will likely find our approach helpful for designing effective risk management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828/pdfft?md5=e92ef989bb0045d45f28293da1f20b49&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001828-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-screening of induced seismicity risks for CO2 injection at Trüllikon, Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Schultz , Antonio Pio Rinaldi , Philippe Roth , Herfried Madritsch , Thanushika Gunatilake , Stefan Wiemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Successful carbon injection operations depend critically on the management of risks, like induced seismicity. Here, we consider the bowtie risk management framework to organize pre-screening efforts around a prospective CO<sub>2</sub> injection operation near Trüllikon, Switzerland. First, potential barriers/threats are appraised via a literature review of the regional seismotectonics, hydrogeology, and nearby induced seismicity cases – which suggests a natural propensity for earthquakes because of the proximity to the Neuhausen Fault and a lack of effective underlying hydrogeological barriers. Next, we engineer barriers to fault reactivation by quantifying the fault slip potential. The closest (∼700 m) and most susceptible (∼3.0 km) portions of the Neuhausen Fault would require ∼1.7 MPa and ∼0.47 MPa for reactivation, respectively. The most susceptible (unknown) faults are normal slip (168° strike) that require ∼0.23 MPa for reactivation. Injection simulations indicate pressure changes on Neuhausen Fault segments of 0.01–0.05 MPa – values that are 1–2 orders-of-magnitude smaller than those needed for fault reactivation. These engineered barriers limit the potential for fault reactivation. However, if these barriers prove totally ineffective, we have also designed a traffic light protocol as a reactive mitigation measure. Forecast estimates of nuisance, damage, and fatalities are used to infer the last-possible stopping-point based on a comparison with operation-ending risks encountered at Basel and St. Gallen. This indicates a red- and yellow-lights of M<sub>W</sub> ∼2.0 and M<sub>W</sub> ∼0.0, respectively. We synthesize these disparate pre-screening analyses to recommend performance targets for real-time seismic monitoring. Future CO<sub>2</sub> operations will likely find our approach helpful for designing effective risk management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828/pdfft?md5=e92ef989bb0045d45f28293da1f20b49&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001828-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pre-screening of induced seismicity risks for CO2 injection at Trüllikon, Switzerland
Successful carbon injection operations depend critically on the management of risks, like induced seismicity. Here, we consider the bowtie risk management framework to organize pre-screening efforts around a prospective CO2 injection operation near Trüllikon, Switzerland. First, potential barriers/threats are appraised via a literature review of the regional seismotectonics, hydrogeology, and nearby induced seismicity cases – which suggests a natural propensity for earthquakes because of the proximity to the Neuhausen Fault and a lack of effective underlying hydrogeological barriers. Next, we engineer barriers to fault reactivation by quantifying the fault slip potential. The closest (∼700 m) and most susceptible (∼3.0 km) portions of the Neuhausen Fault would require ∼1.7 MPa and ∼0.47 MPa for reactivation, respectively. The most susceptible (unknown) faults are normal slip (168° strike) that require ∼0.23 MPa for reactivation. Injection simulations indicate pressure changes on Neuhausen Fault segments of 0.01–0.05 MPa – values that are 1–2 orders-of-magnitude smaller than those needed for fault reactivation. These engineered barriers limit the potential for fault reactivation. However, if these barriers prove totally ineffective, we have also designed a traffic light protocol as a reactive mitigation measure. Forecast estimates of nuisance, damage, and fatalities are used to infer the last-possible stopping-point based on a comparison with operation-ending risks encountered at Basel and St. Gallen. This indicates a red- and yellow-lights of MW ∼2.0 and MW ∼0.0, respectively. We synthesize these disparate pre-screening analyses to recommend performance targets for real-time seismic monitoring. Future CO2 operations will likely find our approach helpful for designing effective risk management.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.