评估金砖国家污泥管理的能源平衡和环境足迹

IF 7.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Zhenyao Wang , Xuan Li , Huan Liu , Jinhua Mou , Stuart J. Khan , Carol Sze Ki Lin , Qilin Wang
{"title":"评估金砖国家污泥管理的能源平衡和环境足迹","authors":"Zhenyao Wang ,&nbsp;Xuan Li ,&nbsp;Huan Liu ,&nbsp;Jinhua Mou ,&nbsp;Stuart J. Khan ,&nbsp;Carol Sze Ki Lin ,&nbsp;Qilin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change is driving global endeavours to achieve carbon neutrality and renewable energy expansion. Sludge, a nutrient-rich waste, holds energy potential yet poses environmental challenges that need proper management. We conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the energy balance and environmental footprint of the most commonly used sludge management scenarios in BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Technologies such as incineration and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery units (i.e., cogeneration unit) maximize energy balance and minimize the environmental footprint, with incineration showing a superior performance. Shifting sludge management scenarios from the worst to the best can boost energy production by 1.4–98.4 times and cut the environmental footprint by 1.5–21.4 times. In 2050, these improvements could lead to a 98-fold boost in energy generation and a 25-fold drop in carbon emissions, according to the Announced Pledges Scenarios. Optimizing parameters such as volatile solids and anaerobic digestion efficiency further boosts energy output and minimizes the environmental footprint. This study offers robust evidence to support sustainable sludge management and thus promote energy recovery and carbon neutrality goals, guide technological transitions, and inform policymaking for sustainable development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52198,"journal":{"name":"Water Research X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000458/pdfft?md5=940b75993a91b13eea3c71d7900e1450&pid=1-s2.0-S2589914724000458-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries\",\"authors\":\"Zhenyao Wang ,&nbsp;Xuan Li ,&nbsp;Huan Liu ,&nbsp;Jinhua Mou ,&nbsp;Stuart J. Khan ,&nbsp;Carol Sze Ki Lin ,&nbsp;Qilin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Climate change is driving global endeavours to achieve carbon neutrality and renewable energy expansion. Sludge, a nutrient-rich waste, holds energy potential yet poses environmental challenges that need proper management. We conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the energy balance and environmental footprint of the most commonly used sludge management scenarios in BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Technologies such as incineration and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery units (i.e., cogeneration unit) maximize energy balance and minimize the environmental footprint, with incineration showing a superior performance. Shifting sludge management scenarios from the worst to the best can boost energy production by 1.4–98.4 times and cut the environmental footprint by 1.5–21.4 times. In 2050, these improvements could lead to a 98-fold boost in energy generation and a 25-fold drop in carbon emissions, according to the Announced Pledges Scenarios. Optimizing parameters such as volatile solids and anaerobic digestion efficiency further boosts energy output and minimizes the environmental footprint. This study offers robust evidence to support sustainable sludge management and thus promote energy recovery and carbon neutrality goals, guide technological transitions, and inform policymaking for sustainable development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000458/pdfft?md5=940b75993a91b13eea3c71d7900e1450&pid=1-s2.0-S2589914724000458-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000458\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research X","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化正在推动全球努力实现碳中和并扩大可再生能源。污泥是一种营养丰富的废弃物,具有能源潜力,但也带来了环境挑战,需要妥善管理。我们进行了一项全面的生命周期评估,以评估金砖国家(即巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)最常用的污泥管理方案的能源平衡和环境足迹。焚烧和带能源回收装置(即热电联产装置)的厌氧消化等技术可最大限度地实现能源平衡和环境足迹最小化,其中焚烧技术表现更优。将污泥管理方案从最差转变为最佳,可将能源生产提高 1.4-98.4 倍,将环境足迹减少 1.5-21.4 倍。根据 "宣布的承诺方案",到 2050 年,这些改进可使能源产量提高 98 倍,碳排放量减少 25 倍。优化挥发性固体物质和厌氧消化效率等参数可进一步提高能源产出,并最大限度地减少对环境的影响。这项研究为支持可持续污泥管理提供了有力证据,从而促进能源回收和碳中和目标的实现,指导技术转型,并为可持续发展决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries

Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries

Climate change is driving global endeavours to achieve carbon neutrality and renewable energy expansion. Sludge, a nutrient-rich waste, holds energy potential yet poses environmental challenges that need proper management. We conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the energy balance and environmental footprint of the most commonly used sludge management scenarios in BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Technologies such as incineration and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery units (i.e., cogeneration unit) maximize energy balance and minimize the environmental footprint, with incineration showing a superior performance. Shifting sludge management scenarios from the worst to the best can boost energy production by 1.4–98.4 times and cut the environmental footprint by 1.5–21.4 times. In 2050, these improvements could lead to a 98-fold boost in energy generation and a 25-fold drop in carbon emissions, according to the Announced Pledges Scenarios. Optimizing parameters such as volatile solids and anaerobic digestion efficiency further boosts energy output and minimizes the environmental footprint. This study offers robust evidence to support sustainable sludge management and thus promote energy recovery and carbon neutrality goals, guide technological transitions, and inform policymaking for sustainable development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Research X
Water Research X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Water Research X is a sister journal of Water Research, which follows a Gold Open Access model. It focuses on publishing concise, letter-style research papers, visionary perspectives and editorials, as well as mini-reviews on emerging topics. The Journal invites contributions from researchers worldwide on various aspects of the science and technology related to the human impact on the water cycle, water quality, and its global management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信