对低能量泳滩轨道速度的非线性进行参数化处理

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
M.A. van der Lugt , M.A. de Schipper , A.J.H.M. Reniers , B.G. Ruessink
{"title":"对低能量泳滩轨道速度的非线性进行参数化处理","authors":"M.A. van der Lugt ,&nbsp;M.A. de Schipper ,&nbsp;A.J.H.M. Reniers ,&nbsp;B.G. Ruessink","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wave nonlinearity plays an important role in cross-shore beach morphodynamics and is often parameterized in engineering-type morphodynamic models through a nonlinear relationship with the Ursell number. It is not evident that the relationship established in previous studies also holds for sheltered sites with fetch-limited seas as they are more prone to effects of local winds and currents, the waves are generally steeper, and the beaches are typically reflective. This study investigates near-bed orbital velocity nonlinearity from wave records collected at two sheltered beaches in The Netherlands and contrasts them to earlier observations made along the exposed, wave-dominated North Sea coast. Our observations at sheltered beaches show that the Ursell number has comparable skill in predicting wave nonlinearity as it has on previously studied exposed coasts. However, the orbital velocities at sheltered coasts are more asymmetric for the same Ursell number than on exposed coasts. When exposed coast data were examined for moments with comparable high-steepness waves, a similar effect on asymmetry was observed. In addition, following and opposing winds were found to have a clear relationship with total nonlinearity, while they did not affect the phase between skewness and asymmetry at the sheltered beaches. Refitting the free parameters of an Ursell-based predictor improved the bias for the asymmetry parameterization. Whether this has implications for modeling of the magnitude of wave-nonlinearity-driven sediment transport using engineering type models is strongly dependent on the sediment transport formulation used, as these formulations depend on additional calibration coefficients too.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 104602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001509/pdfft?md5=656968cb242d98c3dbc80e12f2d48830&pid=1-s2.0-S0378383924001509-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parametrizing nonlinearity in orbital velocity at fetch-limited, low-energy beaches\",\"authors\":\"M.A. van der Lugt ,&nbsp;M.A. de Schipper ,&nbsp;A.J.H.M. Reniers ,&nbsp;B.G. Ruessink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wave nonlinearity plays an important role in cross-shore beach morphodynamics and is often parameterized in engineering-type morphodynamic models through a nonlinear relationship with the Ursell number. It is not evident that the relationship established in previous studies also holds for sheltered sites with fetch-limited seas as they are more prone to effects of local winds and currents, the waves are generally steeper, and the beaches are typically reflective. This study investigates near-bed orbital velocity nonlinearity from wave records collected at two sheltered beaches in The Netherlands and contrasts them to earlier observations made along the exposed, wave-dominated North Sea coast. Our observations at sheltered beaches show that the Ursell number has comparable skill in predicting wave nonlinearity as it has on previously studied exposed coasts. However, the orbital velocities at sheltered coasts are more asymmetric for the same Ursell number than on exposed coasts. When exposed coast data were examined for moments with comparable high-steepness waves, a similar effect on asymmetry was observed. In addition, following and opposing winds were found to have a clear relationship with total nonlinearity, while they did not affect the phase between skewness and asymmetry at the sheltered beaches. Refitting the free parameters of an Ursell-based predictor improved the bias for the asymmetry parameterization. Whether this has implications for modeling of the magnitude of wave-nonlinearity-driven sediment transport using engineering type models is strongly dependent on the sediment transport formulation used, as these formulations depend on additional calibration coefficients too.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001509/pdfft?md5=656968cb242d98c3dbc80e12f2d48830&pid=1-s2.0-S0378383924001509-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

波浪非线性在跨岸海滩形态动力学中起着重要作用,工程型形态动力学模型通常通过与厄塞尔数的非线性关系对其进行参数化。以往研究中建立的关系是否也适用于受海流限制的遮蔽地点并不明显,因为这些地点更容易受到当地风和海流的影响,海浪通常更陡峭,海滩通常具有反射性。本研究根据在荷兰两个遮蔽海滩收集的波浪记录,对近床轨道速度非线性进行了研究,并将其与早先在北海海岸以波浪为主的裸露海域进行的观测结果进行了对比。我们在遮蔽海滩的观测结果表明,厄塞尔数在预测波浪非线性方面的能力与之前在裸露海岸的观测结果相当。然而,与裸露海岸相比,在相同的厄塞尔数下,遮蔽海岸的轨道速度更不对称。当对具有可比高陡度波浪的时刻的裸露海岸数据进行研究时,也观察到了对不对称的类似影响。此外,还发现顺风和逆风与总非线性有明显的关系,而它们并不影响遮蔽海滩的倾斜度和不对称之间的相位。重新拟合基于厄塞尔预测器的自由参数改善了不对称参数化的偏差。这是否对使用工程型模型建立波浪非线性驱动的沉积物输运模型有影响,在很大程度上取决于所使用的沉积物输运公式,因为这些公式也取决于额外的校准系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parametrizing nonlinearity in orbital velocity at fetch-limited, low-energy beaches

Wave nonlinearity plays an important role in cross-shore beach morphodynamics and is often parameterized in engineering-type morphodynamic models through a nonlinear relationship with the Ursell number. It is not evident that the relationship established in previous studies also holds for sheltered sites with fetch-limited seas as they are more prone to effects of local winds and currents, the waves are generally steeper, and the beaches are typically reflective. This study investigates near-bed orbital velocity nonlinearity from wave records collected at two sheltered beaches in The Netherlands and contrasts them to earlier observations made along the exposed, wave-dominated North Sea coast. Our observations at sheltered beaches show that the Ursell number has comparable skill in predicting wave nonlinearity as it has on previously studied exposed coasts. However, the orbital velocities at sheltered coasts are more asymmetric for the same Ursell number than on exposed coasts. When exposed coast data were examined for moments with comparable high-steepness waves, a similar effect on asymmetry was observed. In addition, following and opposing winds were found to have a clear relationship with total nonlinearity, while they did not affect the phase between skewness and asymmetry at the sheltered beaches. Refitting the free parameters of an Ursell-based predictor improved the bias for the asymmetry parameterization. Whether this has implications for modeling of the magnitude of wave-nonlinearity-driven sediment transport using engineering type models is strongly dependent on the sediment transport formulation used, as these formulations depend on additional calibration coefficients too.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信