Yavuz Selim Karatekin , Harun Altinayak , Onur Yontar , Lokman Kehribar
{"title":"关节镜缝合器械对半月板后根影响的生物力学评估","authors":"Yavuz Selim Karatekin , Harun Altinayak , Onur Yontar , Lokman Kehribar","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The study aimed to biomechanically evaluate the effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments used in the treatment of meniscal root tears on the meniscal suture interface in the root region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 40 intact lateral menisci, obtained during total knee arthroplasty, were procured for the purpose of conducting a biomechanical study. The menisci were randomly assigned to one of two distinct test groups: Group 1 using the Accu-Pass Suture Shuttle (cannulated) and Group 2 using the First-pass Mini Suture Passer (non-cannulated), with each group consisting of <em>n</em> = 20 samples. Maximum failure load, stiffness, and displacement values were obtained using a uniaxial universal tensile testing machine.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When the groups were compared in terms of average maximum failure load (Group 1: 152.5N ± 50.7, Group 2: 162.5N ± 54.4), no statistically significant difference was observed (<em>P</em> = 0.549). At the moment of maximum failure load, the displacement values of both groups were similar (<em>P</em> = 0.502). In the comparison conducted for both groups in terms of preconditioning and postconditioning stiffness, no significant difference was detected between groups (<em>P-</em>values were 0.252 and 0.210, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our study, the tissue laceration size created by suture passers at the meniscus–suture interface within the root region was indirectly tested based on the influence of tensile forces. Both suture passers (cannulated and non-cannulated) are similar in terms of maximum failure load, stiffness, and displacement amounts. This study indicates that there is no difference between suture passers for root tears and supports the usability of both methods during surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical evaluation of the effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments on the posterior meniscal root\",\"authors\":\"Yavuz Selim Karatekin , Harun Altinayak , Onur Yontar , Lokman Kehribar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The study aimed to biomechanically evaluate the effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments used in the treatment of meniscal root tears on the meniscal suture interface in the root region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 40 intact lateral menisci, obtained during total knee arthroplasty, were procured for the purpose of conducting a biomechanical study. The menisci were randomly assigned to one of two distinct test groups: Group 1 using the Accu-Pass Suture Shuttle (cannulated) and Group 2 using the First-pass Mini Suture Passer (non-cannulated), with each group consisting of <em>n</em> = 20 samples. Maximum failure load, stiffness, and displacement values were obtained using a uniaxial universal tensile testing machine.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When the groups were compared in terms of average maximum failure load (Group 1: 152.5N ± 50.7, Group 2: 162.5N ± 54.4), no statistically significant difference was observed (<em>P</em> = 0.549). At the moment of maximum failure load, the displacement values of both groups were similar (<em>P</em> = 0.502). In the comparison conducted for both groups in terms of preconditioning and postconditioning stiffness, no significant difference was detected between groups (<em>P-</em>values were 0.252 and 0.210, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our study, the tissue laceration size created by suture passers at the meniscus–suture interface within the root region was indirectly tested based on the influence of tensile forces. Both suture passers (cannulated and non-cannulated) are similar in terms of maximum failure load, stiffness, and displacement amounts. This study indicates that there is no difference between suture passers for root tears and supports the usability of both methods during surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical evaluation of the effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments on the posterior meniscal root
Background
The study aimed to biomechanically evaluate the effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments used in the treatment of meniscal root tears on the meniscal suture interface in the root region.
Methods
A total of 40 intact lateral menisci, obtained during total knee arthroplasty, were procured for the purpose of conducting a biomechanical study. The menisci were randomly assigned to one of two distinct test groups: Group 1 using the Accu-Pass Suture Shuttle (cannulated) and Group 2 using the First-pass Mini Suture Passer (non-cannulated), with each group consisting of n = 20 samples. Maximum failure load, stiffness, and displacement values were obtained using a uniaxial universal tensile testing machine.
Results
When the groups were compared in terms of average maximum failure load (Group 1: 152.5N ± 50.7, Group 2: 162.5N ± 54.4), no statistically significant difference was observed (P = 0.549). At the moment of maximum failure load, the displacement values of both groups were similar (P = 0.502). In the comparison conducted for both groups in terms of preconditioning and postconditioning stiffness, no significant difference was detected between groups (P-values were 0.252 and 0.210, respectively).
Conclusion
In our study, the tissue laceration size created by suture passers at the meniscus–suture interface within the root region was indirectly tested based on the influence of tensile forces. Both suture passers (cannulated and non-cannulated) are similar in terms of maximum failure load, stiffness, and displacement amounts. This study indicates that there is no difference between suture passers for root tears and supports the usability of both methods during surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.