河岸植被影响农业景观中水生温室气体的产生

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
H. Hundal , N.V. Thevathasan , M. Oelbermann
{"title":"河岸植被影响农业景观中水生温室气体的产生","authors":"H. Hundal ,&nbsp;N.V. Thevathasan ,&nbsp;M. Oelbermann","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although riparian vegetation is widely acknowledged for its positive impact on soil and water quality and its role in regulating terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural landscapes, there remains a gap in understanding how different types of riparian vegetation affect aquatic greenhouse gas production. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate whether the type of vegetation within riparian zones influenced aquatic environmental factors, subsequently impacting aquatic greenhouse gas emissions. To address this, we measured greenhouse gases in the aquatic environment bordered by riparian zones with herbaceous vegetation (GRS) compared to undisturbed natural riparian forests dominated by deciduous (UNF-D) or coniferous (UNF-C) vegetation or a rehabilitated riparian forest (RH). Our findings indicate that aquatic CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were not influenced (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) by vegetation type ranging from 9 g L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup> to 11 g L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>. In contrast, aquatic CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations were significantly lower (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in treed riparian zones, ranging from 14 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup> to 24 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>, compared to a riparian zone with herbaceous vegetation (34 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>). However, we observed significantly higher (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) aquatic N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations in treed riparian zones (9.5 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup> to 10.3 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), particularly those dominated by coniferous vegetation (23.0 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), compared to the riparian zone with herbaceous vegetation (7.7 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>). The total CO<sub>2</sub>-C equivalent (i.e., CO<sub>2</sub> + CH<sub>4</sub> + N<sub>2</sub>O) was highest in the riparian zone with coniferous trees (UNF-C: 10,717 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), followed by the GRS (9494 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), RH (9423 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>) and UNF-D (9,183 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>) riparian zone. Moreover, riparian vegetation was influenced by various environmental factors that likely controlled physicochemical and biological processes related to the production of greenhouse gases within the aquatic environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002118/pdfft?md5=e89d84a6607bb24693a9234fb7e893e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002118-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Riparian vegetation influences aquatic greenhouse gas production in an agricultural landscape\",\"authors\":\"H. Hundal ,&nbsp;N.V. Thevathasan ,&nbsp;M. Oelbermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although riparian vegetation is widely acknowledged for its positive impact on soil and water quality and its role in regulating terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural landscapes, there remains a gap in understanding how different types of riparian vegetation affect aquatic greenhouse gas production. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate whether the type of vegetation within riparian zones influenced aquatic environmental factors, subsequently impacting aquatic greenhouse gas emissions. To address this, we measured greenhouse gases in the aquatic environment bordered by riparian zones with herbaceous vegetation (GRS) compared to undisturbed natural riparian forests dominated by deciduous (UNF-D) or coniferous (UNF-C) vegetation or a rehabilitated riparian forest (RH). Our findings indicate that aquatic CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were not influenced (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) by vegetation type ranging from 9 g L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup> to 11 g L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>. In contrast, aquatic CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations were significantly lower (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in treed riparian zones, ranging from 14 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup> to 24 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>, compared to a riparian zone with herbaceous vegetation (34 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>). However, we observed significantly higher (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) aquatic N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations in treed riparian zones (9.5 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup> to 10.3 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), particularly those dominated by coniferous vegetation (23.0 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), compared to the riparian zone with herbaceous vegetation (7.7 μg L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>). The total CO<sub>2</sub>-C equivalent (i.e., CO<sub>2</sub> + CH<sub>4</sub> + N<sub>2</sub>O) was highest in the riparian zone with coniferous trees (UNF-C: 10,717 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), followed by the GRS (9494 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>), RH (9423 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>) and UNF-D (9,183 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-Ceq L<sup>−<span>1</span></sup>) riparian zone. Moreover, riparian vegetation was influenced by various environmental factors that likely controlled physicochemical and biological processes related to the production of greenhouse gases within the aquatic environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002118/pdfft?md5=e89d84a6607bb24693a9234fb7e893e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002118-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002118\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管河岸植被因其对土壤和水质的积极影响及其在农业景观中调节陆地温室气体排放的作用而得到广泛认可,但人们对不同类型的河岸植被如何影响水生温室气体产生的认识仍然存在差距。因此,本研究的目的是调查河岸地带的植被类型是否会影响水生环境因素,进而影响水生温室气体的排放。为此,我们测量了河岸带草本植被(GRS)与以落叶(UNF-D)或针叶(UNF-C)植被为主的未受干扰天然河岸林或修复河岸林(RH)相比较的水生环境中的温室气体。我们的研究结果表明,水生二氧化碳浓度不受植被类型的影响(p < 0.05),植被类型从 9 g L-1 到 11 g L-1 不等。相比之下,植被为草本植物的河岸带(34 微克/升)的水生甲烷浓度明显较低(p < 0.05),从 14 微克/升到 24 微克/升不等。然而,与有草本植被的河岸带(7.7 μg L-1)相比,我们观察到在有树木的河岸带(9.5 μg L-1 至 10.3 μg L-1),尤其是以针叶植被为主的河岸带(23.0 μg L-1),水生一氧化二氮浓度明显更高(p < 0.05)。总 CO2-C 当量(即 CO2 + CH4 + N2O)在有针叶树的河岸带最高(UNF-C:10,717 毫克 CO2-Ceq L-1),其次是 GRS(9494 毫克 CO2-Ceq L-1)、RH(9423 毫克 CO2-Ceq L-1)和 UNF-D 河岸带(9183 毫克 CO2-Ceq L-1)。此外,河岸植被还受到各种环境因素的影响,这些因素可能控制着与水生环境中温室气体产生有关的物理化学和生物过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Riparian vegetation influences aquatic greenhouse gas production in an agricultural landscape

Although riparian vegetation is widely acknowledged for its positive impact on soil and water quality and its role in regulating terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural landscapes, there remains a gap in understanding how different types of riparian vegetation affect aquatic greenhouse gas production. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate whether the type of vegetation within riparian zones influenced aquatic environmental factors, subsequently impacting aquatic greenhouse gas emissions. To address this, we measured greenhouse gases in the aquatic environment bordered by riparian zones with herbaceous vegetation (GRS) compared to undisturbed natural riparian forests dominated by deciduous (UNF-D) or coniferous (UNF-C) vegetation or a rehabilitated riparian forest (RH). Our findings indicate that aquatic CO2 concentrations were not influenced (p < 0.05) by vegetation type ranging from 9 g L1 to 11 g L1. In contrast, aquatic CH4 concentrations were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in treed riparian zones, ranging from 14 μg L1 to 24 μg L1, compared to a riparian zone with herbaceous vegetation (34 μg L1). However, we observed significantly higher (p < 0.05) aquatic N2O concentrations in treed riparian zones (9.5 μg L1 to 10.3 μg L1), particularly those dominated by coniferous vegetation (23.0 μg L1), compared to the riparian zone with herbaceous vegetation (7.7 μg L1). The total CO2-C equivalent (i.e., CO2 + CH4 + N2O) was highest in the riparian zone with coniferous trees (UNF-C: 10,717 mg CO2-Ceq L1), followed by the GRS (9494 mg CO2-Ceq L1), RH (9423 mg CO2-Ceq L1) and UNF-D (9,183 mg CO2-Ceq L1) riparian zone. Moreover, riparian vegetation was influenced by various environmental factors that likely controlled physicochemical and biological processes related to the production of greenhouse gases within the aquatic environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信