Hong Wang Fung , Stanley Kam Ki Lam , Janet Yuen-Ha Wong
{"title":"DSM-5 BPD 和 ICD-11 复杂创伤后应激障碍:香港寻求治疗者的并发症及相关因素","authors":"Hong Wang Fung , Stanley Kam Ki Lam , Janet Yuen-Ha Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is an ongoing debate regarding whether ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 borderline personality disorder (BPD) are the same syndrome. Little is known about the extent to which these two conditions overlap and whether they exhibit distinct clinical correlates in Asian cultures. This study examined the co-occurrence of ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 BPD in a sample of treatment seekers in Hong Kong (N = 220). Participants completed validated self-report measures which assessed if they met the respective diagnostic criteria. In this sample, 30.9 % met the ICD-11 criteria for complex PTSD only, 10.0 % met the DSM-5 criteria for BPD only, and 28.2 % met the criteria for both conditions. Complex PTSD symptoms were most strongly associated with depressive symptoms (β =.347, p <.001) and trauma-related maladaptive beliefs (β =.337, p <.001), while BPD symptoms were most strongly associated with dissociative symptoms (β =.281, p <.001). This study is the first to show that ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 BPD commonly co-occurred but were not the same construct in the Asian context, and their symptoms were associated with different sets of demographic and clinical factors. Future editions of DSM and ICD should not merge the two conditions into a single diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 104195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DSM-5 BPD and ICD-11 complex PTSD: Co-occurrence and associated factors among treatment seekers in Hong Kong\",\"authors\":\"Hong Wang Fung , Stanley Kam Ki Lam , Janet Yuen-Ha Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is an ongoing debate regarding whether ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 borderline personality disorder (BPD) are the same syndrome. Little is known about the extent to which these two conditions overlap and whether they exhibit distinct clinical correlates in Asian cultures. This study examined the co-occurrence of ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 BPD in a sample of treatment seekers in Hong Kong (N = 220). Participants completed validated self-report measures which assessed if they met the respective diagnostic criteria. In this sample, 30.9 % met the ICD-11 criteria for complex PTSD only, 10.0 % met the DSM-5 criteria for BPD only, and 28.2 % met the criteria for both conditions. Complex PTSD symptoms were most strongly associated with depressive symptoms (β =.347, p <.001) and trauma-related maladaptive beliefs (β =.337, p <.001), while BPD symptoms were most strongly associated with dissociative symptoms (β =.281, p <.001). This study is the first to show that ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 BPD commonly co-occurred but were not the same construct in the Asian context, and their symptoms were associated with different sets of demographic and clinical factors. Future editions of DSM and ICD should not merge the two conditions into a single diagnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002880\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
DSM-5 BPD and ICD-11 complex PTSD: Co-occurrence and associated factors among treatment seekers in Hong Kong
There is an ongoing debate regarding whether ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 borderline personality disorder (BPD) are the same syndrome. Little is known about the extent to which these two conditions overlap and whether they exhibit distinct clinical correlates in Asian cultures. This study examined the co-occurrence of ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 BPD in a sample of treatment seekers in Hong Kong (N = 220). Participants completed validated self-report measures which assessed if they met the respective diagnostic criteria. In this sample, 30.9 % met the ICD-11 criteria for complex PTSD only, 10.0 % met the DSM-5 criteria for BPD only, and 28.2 % met the criteria for both conditions. Complex PTSD symptoms were most strongly associated with depressive symptoms (β =.347, p <.001) and trauma-related maladaptive beliefs (β =.337, p <.001), while BPD symptoms were most strongly associated with dissociative symptoms (β =.281, p <.001). This study is the first to show that ICD-11 complex PTSD and DSM-5 BPD commonly co-occurred but were not the same construct in the Asian context, and their symptoms were associated with different sets of demographic and clinical factors. Future editions of DSM and ICD should not merge the two conditions into a single diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.