Juhi Farooqui, Ameya C Nanivadekar, Marco Capogrosso, Scott F Lempka, Lee E Fisher
{"title":"神经元形态和空间分布对刺激背根神经节选择性的影响","authors":"Juhi Farooqui, Ameya C Nanivadekar, Marco Capogrosso, Scott F Lempka, Lee E Fisher","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad7760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>For prosthesis users, sensory feedback that appears to come from the missing limb can improve function, confidence, and phantom limb pain. Numerous pre-clinical studies have considered stimulation via penetrating microelectrodes at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) as a potential approach for somatosensory neuroprostheses. However, to develop clinically translatable neuroprosthetic devices, a less invasive approach, such as stimulation via epineural macroelectrodes, would be preferable. This work explores the feasibility of using such electrodes to deliver focal sensory feedback by examining the mechanisms of selective activation in response to stimulation via epineural electrodes compared with penetrating electrodes.<i>Approach.</i>We developed computational models of the DRG, representing the biophysical properties of the DRG and surrounding tissue to evaluate neural responses to stimulation via penetrating microelectrodes and epineural macroelectrodes. To assess the role of properties such as neuron morphology and spatial arrangement we designed three models, including one that contained only axons (axon only), one with pseudounipolar neurons arranged randomly (random), and one with pseudounipolar neurons placed according to a realistic spatial distribution (realistic).<i>Main results.</i>Our models demonstrate that activation in response to stimulation via epineural electrodes in a realistic model is commonly initiated in the axon initial segment adjacent to the cell body, whereas penetrating electrodes commonly elicit responses in t-junctions and axons. Moreover, we see a wider dynamic range for epineural electrodes compared with penetrating electrodes. This difference appears to be driven by the spatial organization and neuron morphology of the realistic DRG.<i>Significance.</i>We demonstrate that the anatomical features of the DRG make it a potentially effective target for epineural stimulation to deliver focal sensations from the limbs. Specifically, we show that epineural stimulation at the DRG can be highly selective thanks to the neuroanatomical arrangement of the DRG, making this a promising approach for future neuroprosthetic development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of neuron morphology and spatial distribution on the selectivity of dorsal root ganglion stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Juhi Farooqui, Ameya C Nanivadekar, Marco Capogrosso, Scott F Lempka, Lee E Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/ad7760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>For prosthesis users, sensory feedback that appears to come from the missing limb can improve function, confidence, and phantom limb pain. Numerous pre-clinical studies have considered stimulation via penetrating microelectrodes at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) as a potential approach for somatosensory neuroprostheses. However, to develop clinically translatable neuroprosthetic devices, a less invasive approach, such as stimulation via epineural macroelectrodes, would be preferable. This work explores the feasibility of using such electrodes to deliver focal sensory feedback by examining the mechanisms of selective activation in response to stimulation via epineural electrodes compared with penetrating electrodes.<i>Approach.</i>We developed computational models of the DRG, representing the biophysical properties of the DRG and surrounding tissue to evaluate neural responses to stimulation via penetrating microelectrodes and epineural macroelectrodes. To assess the role of properties such as neuron morphology and spatial arrangement we designed three models, including one that contained only axons (axon only), one with pseudounipolar neurons arranged randomly (random), and one with pseudounipolar neurons placed according to a realistic spatial distribution (realistic).<i>Main results.</i>Our models demonstrate that activation in response to stimulation via epineural electrodes in a realistic model is commonly initiated in the axon initial segment adjacent to the cell body, whereas penetrating electrodes commonly elicit responses in t-junctions and axons. Moreover, we see a wider dynamic range for epineural electrodes compared with penetrating electrodes. This difference appears to be driven by the spatial organization and neuron morphology of the realistic DRG.<i>Significance.</i>We demonstrate that the anatomical features of the DRG make it a potentially effective target for epineural stimulation to deliver focal sensations from the limbs. Specifically, we show that epineural stimulation at the DRG can be highly selective thanks to the neuroanatomical arrangement of the DRG, making this a promising approach for future neuroprosthetic development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475779/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad7760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad7760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effects of neuron morphology and spatial distribution on the selectivity of dorsal root ganglion stimulation.
Objective.For prosthesis users, sensory feedback that appears to come from the missing limb can improve function, confidence, and phantom limb pain. Numerous pre-clinical studies have considered stimulation via penetrating microelectrodes at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) as a potential approach for somatosensory neuroprostheses. However, to develop clinically translatable neuroprosthetic devices, a less invasive approach, such as stimulation via epineural macroelectrodes, would be preferable. This work explores the feasibility of using such electrodes to deliver focal sensory feedback by examining the mechanisms of selective activation in response to stimulation via epineural electrodes compared with penetrating electrodes.Approach.We developed computational models of the DRG, representing the biophysical properties of the DRG and surrounding tissue to evaluate neural responses to stimulation via penetrating microelectrodes and epineural macroelectrodes. To assess the role of properties such as neuron morphology and spatial arrangement we designed three models, including one that contained only axons (axon only), one with pseudounipolar neurons arranged randomly (random), and one with pseudounipolar neurons placed according to a realistic spatial distribution (realistic).Main results.Our models demonstrate that activation in response to stimulation via epineural electrodes in a realistic model is commonly initiated in the axon initial segment adjacent to the cell body, whereas penetrating electrodes commonly elicit responses in t-junctions and axons. Moreover, we see a wider dynamic range for epineural electrodes compared with penetrating electrodes. This difference appears to be driven by the spatial organization and neuron morphology of the realistic DRG.Significance.We demonstrate that the anatomical features of the DRG make it a potentially effective target for epineural stimulation to deliver focal sensations from the limbs. Specifically, we show that epineural stimulation at the DRG can be highly selective thanks to the neuroanatomical arrangement of the DRG, making this a promising approach for future neuroprosthetic development.