人工耳蜗植入术后的味觉障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834
Maisie Fitzgerald, Alex Fleet, Michele Tomasoni, Veronica Phillips, Neil Donnelly, Patrick Axon, James Tysome, Matthew Smith, Manohar Bance, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Daniele Borsetto
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入术后的味觉障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Maisie Fitzgerald, Alex Fleet, Michele Tomasoni, Veronica Phillips, Neil Donnelly, Patrick Axon, James Tysome, Matthew Smith, Manohar Bance, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Daniele Borsetto","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the rate of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies psychophysically measured taste. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were used. An overall mean from studies reporting a single mean of taste strip performance was calculated using inverse variance method for pooling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 380 studies identified, 9 were included across which 55 cases of postoperative taste disturbance were reported in 498 patients. Taste was tested at variable timepoints, from <1 week to ≥6 months postoperatively. The overall rate of postoperative taste disturbance was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.6-20.7%) with high heterogeneity between studies (I<sup>2 </sup>= 62%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>13.5% might indicate a higher prevalence of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation compared to the general population. However, the confidence we can assign to our calculated rate is limited by significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Studies reporting mean taste strip scores generally found reduced taste function on the side of the tongue ipsilateral to implantation, but this reduction wasn't statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research, employing more robust and standardised methodologies, is necessary to accurately ascertain the rate and nature of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"403-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taste disturbance following cochlear implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maisie Fitzgerald, Alex Fleet, Michele Tomasoni, Veronica Phillips, Neil Donnelly, Patrick Axon, James Tysome, Matthew Smith, Manohar Bance, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Daniele Borsetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the rate of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies psychophysically measured taste. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were used. An overall mean from studies reporting a single mean of taste strip performance was calculated using inverse variance method for pooling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 380 studies identified, 9 were included across which 55 cases of postoperative taste disturbance were reported in 498 patients. Taste was tested at variable timepoints, from <1 week to ≥6 months postoperatively. The overall rate of postoperative taste disturbance was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.6-20.7%) with high heterogeneity between studies (I<sup>2 </sup>= 62%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>13.5% might indicate a higher prevalence of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation compared to the general population. However, the confidence we can assign to our calculated rate is limited by significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Studies reporting mean taste strip scores generally found reduced taste function on the side of the tongue ipsilateral to implantation, but this reduction wasn't statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research, employing more robust and standardised methodologies, is necessary to accurately ascertain the rate and nature of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"403-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2398834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在估算人工耳蜗植入术后味觉障碍的发生率:该综述是根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南设计的。纳入的研究对味觉进行了心理物理测量。采用了 DerSimonian 和 Laird 随机效应模型。使用逆方差法计算了报告味觉条表现单一平均值的研究的总体平均值:在已确定的 380 项研究中,有 9 项被纳入其中,这些研究报告了 498 例患者中的 55 例术后味觉障碍病例。讨论:与普通人群相比,13.5% 可能表明人工耳蜗植入术后味觉障碍的发生率较高。然而,由于存在显著的异质性和潜在的出版偏差,我们对计算出的发病率的信心受到了限制。报告味觉条平均得分的研究普遍发现,植入人工耳蜗后同侧舌头的味觉功能下降,但这种下降在统计学上并不显著:结论:要准确确定人工耳蜗植入术后味觉障碍的发生率和性质,有必要采用更加可靠和标准化的方法开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taste disturbance following cochlear implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the rate of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.

Methods: The review was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies psychophysically measured taste. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were used. An overall mean from studies reporting a single mean of taste strip performance was calculated using inverse variance method for pooling.

Results: Of 380 studies identified, 9 were included across which 55 cases of postoperative taste disturbance were reported in 498 patients. Taste was tested at variable timepoints, from <1 week to ≥6 months postoperatively. The overall rate of postoperative taste disturbance was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.6-20.7%) with high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 62%).

Discussion: 13.5% might indicate a higher prevalence of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation compared to the general population. However, the confidence we can assign to our calculated rate is limited by significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Studies reporting mean taste strip scores generally found reduced taste function on the side of the tongue ipsilateral to implantation, but this reduction wasn't statistically significant.

Conclusion: Further research, employing more robust and standardised methodologies, is necessary to accurately ascertain the rate and nature of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信