围手术期常规处方质子泵抑制剂与全髋关节和膝关节置换术后两年翻修手术率降低有关。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew B Harris, Amil R Agarwal, Vishal Hegde, Julius K Oni, Harpal S Khanuja
{"title":"围手术期常规处方质子泵抑制剂与全髋关节和膝关节置换术后两年翻修手术率降低有关。","authors":"Andrew B Harris, Amil R Agarwal, Vishal Hegde, Julius K Oni, Harpal S Khanuja","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing, however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA+PPI, 2,622 THA+PPI, 3,103 TKA Controls, and 2,622 THA Controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated with Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B Harris, Amil R Agarwal, Vishal Hegde, Julius K Oni, Harpal S Khanuja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing, however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA+PPI, 2,622 THA+PPI, 3,103 TKA Controls, and 2,622 THA Controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:全髋关节(THA)和全膝关节(TKA)置换术后,由于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)具有保护胃肠道的作用,因此经常与非类固醇消炎药(NSAID)一起使用。在动物实验中,有人认为 PPI 具有免疫抑制作用,会影响骨折愈合,但是,PPI 的使用与全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术后不良事件之间的关系尚未得到充分研究:对 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受择期 THA 的患者进行了行政索赔数据库查询。实验组包括既往无胃肠道(GI)出血或胃食管反流病(GERD)病史且在围手术期接受过 PPI 处方治疗的患者。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配法建立了未服用任何 PPI 处方的患者对照组,同时还根据年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症指数进行了匹配。然后对接受择期 TKA 手术的患者重复同样的队列选择和匹配程序。总共研究了 11,450 名患者(3,103 名 TKA+PPI、2,622 名 THA+PPI、3,103 名 TKA 对照组和 2,622 名 THA 对照组)。平均年龄为 64 岁(38 至 94 岁不等),57% 为女性。P<0.05为显著性:TKA患者围手术期服用PPI可显著降低全因翻修率(3.0%对4.1%,P<0.01)和假体周围关节感染率(1.0%对1.8%,P<0.01)。在THA患者中,PPI处方与较低的全因翻修率相关(2.8%对4.0%,P = 0.02)。在无菌性松动、假体周围骨折、消化道出血或手术部位感染方面,PPI组和非PPI组之间均无明显差异:结论:在TKA和THA围手术期接受常规PPI处方的患者进行全因翻修手术的风险较低,TKA患者围手术期使用PPI与PJI风险降低有关。由于这些结果与之前就该主题进行的少数几项研究相冲突,因此有必要进行更多的对照研究,以充分阐明 PPI 的使用与 THA 和 TKA 术后不良事件之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated with Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction: Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing, however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well studied.

Methods: An administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA+PPI, 2,622 THA+PPI, 3,103 TKA Controls, and 2,622 THA Controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05.

Results: Perioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort.

Conclusions: Patients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信