中风治疗的障碍:远离血栓切除中心的代价。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Olav Søvik, Halvor Øygarden, Arnstein Tveiten, Martin Wilhelm Kurz, Kathinka Dæhli Kurz, Pål Johan Stokkeland, Hanne Brit Hetland, Hege Langli Ersdal, Per Kristian Hyldmo
{"title":"中风治疗的障碍:远离血栓切除中心的代价。","authors":"Olav Søvik, Halvor Øygarden, Arnstein Tveiten, Martin Wilhelm Kurz, Kathinka Dæhli Kurz, Pål Johan Stokkeland, Hanne Brit Hetland, Hege Langli Ersdal, Per Kristian Hyldmo","doi":"10.1177/15910199241278036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy, the preferred treatment for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke, is highly time-dependent. Many patients live far from thrombectomy centers due to large geographical variations in stroke services. This study aimed to explore the consequences of long transport distance on the proportion of thrombectomy-eligible patients who underwent thrombectomy, the clinical outcomes with or without thrombectomy, the timelines for patients transported, and the diagnostic accuracy of large-vessel occlusion in primary stroke centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study in a county with only primary stroke centers, ∼ 300 km from the nearest thrombectomy center. All stroke patients admitted over a year were retrieved from the Norwegian Stroke Registry. A neuroradiologist identified all computed tomography images with large-vessel occlusions. A panel determined whether these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50% of the eligible patients did not receive thrombectomy. These patients had a significantly higher risk of severe disability or death compared to the patients who underwent thrombectomy. The median time from computed tomography imaging at the primary stroke center to arrival at the thrombectomy center was over 3 hours. Additionally, 30% of the large-vessel occlusions were initially undiagnosed, and half of these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a county with a long transport distance to a thrombectomy center, a high proportion of eligible patients did not undergo thrombectomy, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. The transport time was considerable. A high rate of large-vessel occlusions was initially not diagnosed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241278036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to stroke treatment: The price of long-distance from thrombectomy centers.\",\"authors\":\"Olav Søvik, Halvor Øygarden, Arnstein Tveiten, Martin Wilhelm Kurz, Kathinka Dæhli Kurz, Pål Johan Stokkeland, Hanne Brit Hetland, Hege Langli Ersdal, Per Kristian Hyldmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241278036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy, the preferred treatment for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke, is highly time-dependent. Many patients live far from thrombectomy centers due to large geographical variations in stroke services. This study aimed to explore the consequences of long transport distance on the proportion of thrombectomy-eligible patients who underwent thrombectomy, the clinical outcomes with or without thrombectomy, the timelines for patients transported, and the diagnostic accuracy of large-vessel occlusion in primary stroke centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study in a county with only primary stroke centers, ∼ 300 km from the nearest thrombectomy center. All stroke patients admitted over a year were retrieved from the Norwegian Stroke Registry. A neuroradiologist identified all computed tomography images with large-vessel occlusions. A panel determined whether these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50% of the eligible patients did not receive thrombectomy. These patients had a significantly higher risk of severe disability or death compared to the patients who underwent thrombectomy. The median time from computed tomography imaging at the primary stroke center to arrival at the thrombectomy center was over 3 hours. Additionally, 30% of the large-vessel occlusions were initially undiagnosed, and half of these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a county with a long transport distance to a thrombectomy center, a high proportion of eligible patients did not undergo thrombectomy, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. The transport time was considerable. A high rate of large-vessel occlusions was initially not diagnosed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241278036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571533/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241278036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241278036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管内血栓切除术是急性大血管闭塞性卒中的首选治疗方法,但其时间依赖性很强。由于卒中服务的地域差异很大,许多患者居住地离血栓切除中心很远。本研究旨在探讨长途运输对符合血栓切除术条件的患者接受血栓切除术的比例、接受或不接受血栓切除术的临床效果、患者转运的时间以及初级卒中中心对大血管闭塞的诊断准确性的影响:我们在一个只有初级卒中中心的县开展了一项回顾性观察研究,该县距离最近的血栓切除中心有 300 公里。我们从挪威卒中登记处检索了一年内收治的所有卒中患者。神经放射科医生对所有大血管闭塞的计算机断层扫描图像进行鉴定。一个专家小组确定这些患者是否有相应的血栓切除术临床指征:结果:共有50%的符合条件的患者没有接受血栓切除术。与接受血栓切除术的患者相比,这些患者严重残疾或死亡的风险明显更高。从初级卒中中心进行计算机断层扫描成像到到达血栓切除中心的中位时间超过 3 小时。此外,30%的大血管闭塞患者最初未被诊断,其中一半患者有相应的血栓切除术临床指征:结论:在交通距离血栓切除中心较远的一个县,有很大一部分符合条件的患者没有接受血栓切除术,这对临床结果产生了负面影响。运输时间相当长。最初未确诊的大血管闭塞率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to stroke treatment: The price of long-distance from thrombectomy centers.

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy, the preferred treatment for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke, is highly time-dependent. Many patients live far from thrombectomy centers due to large geographical variations in stroke services. This study aimed to explore the consequences of long transport distance on the proportion of thrombectomy-eligible patients who underwent thrombectomy, the clinical outcomes with or without thrombectomy, the timelines for patients transported, and the diagnostic accuracy of large-vessel occlusion in primary stroke centers.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study in a county with only primary stroke centers, ∼ 300 km from the nearest thrombectomy center. All stroke patients admitted over a year were retrieved from the Norwegian Stroke Registry. A neuroradiologist identified all computed tomography images with large-vessel occlusions. A panel determined whether these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy.

Results: A total of 50% of the eligible patients did not receive thrombectomy. These patients had a significantly higher risk of severe disability or death compared to the patients who underwent thrombectomy. The median time from computed tomography imaging at the primary stroke center to arrival at the thrombectomy center was over 3 hours. Additionally, 30% of the large-vessel occlusions were initially undiagnosed, and half of these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy.

Conclusions: In a county with a long transport distance to a thrombectomy center, a high proportion of eligible patients did not undergo thrombectomy, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. The transport time was considerable. A high rate of large-vessel occlusions was initially not diagnosed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信