改用电子烟或其他烟草制品的人中的卷烟复吸率。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruoyan Sun, David Mendez, Kenneth E Warner
{"title":"改用电子烟或其他烟草制品的人中的卷烟复吸率。","authors":"Ruoyan Sun, David Mendez, Kenneth E Warner","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about how quitting and switching to other tobacco products affects cigarette smoking relapse. Additionally, there is no consensus on the best definition of relapse.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Respondents who smoked cigarettes at baseline, had quit by the first follow-up, and completed the second follow-up survey in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study were included. We employed multivariable logistic regressions to assess the association between non-cigarette tobacco use at follow-up 1 and smoking relapse risk at follow-up 2, considering three definitions of relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54.8% of the 1686 respondents who had recently quit smoking cigarettes relapsed according to Measure I (any smoking in the past 12 months), 40.3% using Measure II (any smoking in the past 30 days), and 30.1% using Measure III (smoked on ≥3 days in the past 30 days). Compared with no tobacco use at follow-up 1, any tobacco use was associated with increased relapse risk using Measure I (adjusted risk difference [aRD] = 7.14, CI [0.64 to 13.64]). The association was nonsignificant using Measures II (aRD = -0.53, CI [-6.62 to 5.56]) or III (aRD = -4.11, CI [-9.28 to 1.06]). Similarly, exclusive e-cigarette use was significantly associated with Measure I, but not with Measures II or III.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with respondents who had recently quit and were tobacco-free at follow-up 1, those who switched to non-cigarette tobacco products may be more likely to slip but showed no difference in the likelihood of relapse when employing a relapse definition less strict than any smoking in the past 12 months.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The distinction between a slip and relapse needs to be considered more carefully, with researchers undertaking further studies that help us contemplate how we should define relapse. People who recently quit smoking cigarettes and switched to non-cigarette tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) may be more likely to slip compared to people who recently quit and were tobacco-free, but they are not clearly more likely to relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"637-643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cigarette Smoking Relapse Among People Who Switched to E-cigarettes or Other Tobacco Products.\",\"authors\":\"Ruoyan Sun, David Mendez, Kenneth E Warner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about how quitting and switching to other tobacco products affects cigarette smoking relapse. Additionally, there is no consensus on the best definition of relapse.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Respondents who smoked cigarettes at baseline, had quit by the first follow-up, and completed the second follow-up survey in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study were included. We employed multivariable logistic regressions to assess the association between non-cigarette tobacco use at follow-up 1 and smoking relapse risk at follow-up 2, considering three definitions of relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54.8% of the 1686 respondents who had recently quit smoking cigarettes relapsed according to Measure I (any smoking in the past 12 months), 40.3% using Measure II (any smoking in the past 30 days), and 30.1% using Measure III (smoked on ≥3 days in the past 30 days). Compared with no tobacco use at follow-up 1, any tobacco use was associated with increased relapse risk using Measure I (adjusted risk difference [aRD] = 7.14, CI [0.64 to 13.64]). The association was nonsignificant using Measures II (aRD = -0.53, CI [-6.62 to 5.56]) or III (aRD = -4.11, CI [-9.28 to 1.06]). Similarly, exclusive e-cigarette use was significantly associated with Measure I, but not with Measures II or III.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with respondents who had recently quit and were tobacco-free at follow-up 1, those who switched to non-cigarette tobacco products may be more likely to slip but showed no difference in the likelihood of relapse when employing a relapse definition less strict than any smoking in the past 12 months.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The distinction between a slip and relapse needs to be considered more carefully, with researchers undertaking further studies that help us contemplate how we should define relapse. People who recently quit smoking cigarettes and switched to non-cigarette tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) may be more likely to slip compared to people who recently quit and were tobacco-free, but they are not clearly more likely to relapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"637-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931215/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人们对戒烟和改用其他烟草制品如何影响卷烟复吸知之甚少。此外,关于复吸的最佳定义也没有达成共识:研究对象包括基线吸烟、第一次随访时已戒烟并完成烟草与健康人群评估研究第二次随访调查的受访者。考虑到复吸的三种定义,我们采用多变量逻辑回归评估了第一次随访时非卷烟烟草使用与第二次随访时复吸风险之间的关系:在最近戒烟的1686名受访者中,54.8%的人根据衡量标准I(过去12个月内是否吸烟)复吸,40.3%的人根据衡量标准II(过去30天内是否吸烟)复吸,30.1%的人根据衡量标准III(过去30天内吸烟≥3天)复吸。与随访1时未吸烟相比,使用衡量标准I时,任何吸烟行为都会增加复吸风险(调整后风险差异[aRD] = 7.14,CI [0.64至13.64])。使用衡量指标II(aRD = -0.53,CI [-6.62 to 5.56])或衡量指标III(aRD = -4.11,CI [-9.28 to 1.06])时,这种关联并不显著。同样,完全使用电子烟与衡量指标 I 显著相关,但与衡量指标 II 或 III 无关:结论:与最近已戒烟且在随访1时无烟草制品的受访者相比,改用非卷烟烟草制品的受访者可能更容易失足,但在采用比过去12个月内是否吸烟更为宽松的复吸定义时,其复吸可能性并无差异:启示:需要更仔细地考虑失足和复吸之间的区别,研究人员应开展进一步研究,帮助我们思考如何定义复吸。近期戒烟并改用非卷烟烟草制品(包括电子烟)的人可能比近期戒烟且不吸烟的人更容易失足,但他们并不明显更容易复吸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cigarette Smoking Relapse Among People Who Switched to E-cigarettes or Other Tobacco Products.

Introduction: Little is known about how quitting and switching to other tobacco products affects cigarette smoking relapse. Additionally, there is no consensus on the best definition of relapse.

Aims and methods: Respondents who smoked cigarettes at baseline, had quit by the first follow-up, and completed the second follow-up survey in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study were included. We employed multivariable logistic regressions to assess the association between non-cigarette tobacco use at follow-up 1 and smoking relapse risk at follow-up 2, considering three definitions of relapse.

Results: 54.8% of the 1686 respondents who had recently quit smoking cigarettes relapsed according to Measure I (any smoking in the past 12 months), 40.3% using Measure II (any smoking in the past 30 days), and 30.1% using Measure III (smoked on ≥3 days in the past 30 days). Compared with no tobacco use at follow-up 1, any tobacco use was associated with increased relapse risk using Measure I (adjusted risk difference [aRD] = 7.14, CI [0.64 to 13.64]). The association was nonsignificant using Measures II (aRD = -0.53, CI [-6.62 to 5.56]) or III (aRD = -4.11, CI [-9.28 to 1.06]). Similarly, exclusive e-cigarette use was significantly associated with Measure I, but not with Measures II or III.

Conclusions: Compared with respondents who had recently quit and were tobacco-free at follow-up 1, those who switched to non-cigarette tobacco products may be more likely to slip but showed no difference in the likelihood of relapse when employing a relapse definition less strict than any smoking in the past 12 months.

Implications: The distinction between a slip and relapse needs to be considered more carefully, with researchers undertaking further studies that help us contemplate how we should define relapse. People who recently quit smoking cigarettes and switched to non-cigarette tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) may be more likely to slip compared to people who recently quit and were tobacco-free, but they are not clearly more likely to relapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信