颞下颌关节紊乱症的治疗难题。

Q2 Medicine
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.15386/mpr-2687
Smaranda Buduru, Oana Almăşan, Daniela Condor, Manuela Tăut, Anca Mesaroş, Manuela Manziuc, Andreea Kui
{"title":"颞下颌关节紊乱症的治疗难题。","authors":"Smaranda Buduru, Oana Almăşan, Daniela Condor, Manuela Tăut, Anca Mesaroş, Manuela Manziuc, Andreea Kui","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed at evaluating the etiology and treatment challenges of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>160 subjects with TMDs, 38 males (23.8%) and 122 females (76.3%) were studied. A personalized coefficient was designated, which included the resolution of the main symptom, correction of secondary symptoms, patient collaboration (emotional parameter), treatment duration, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent cause for consultation was muscle impairment (42.5%), or limitation of mouth opening, followed by joint impairment (23.1%). Muscle pain was noticed, particularly in the masseter (57.5%) and lateral pterygoid muscles (51.9%). Tooth pain or gingival retraction was frequently associated with tooth wear (48.1%) and dental abfraction (31.3%). Remote symptomatology was dominated by otologic symptomatology. Iatrogenic etiology was highest (69.4%), followed by untreated missing teeth (66.9%). Treatment options included muscle relaxation, occlusal balancing (equilibration), kinesitherapy, medication, and swallowing re-education. Most patients benefited from four to seven different types of therapy, which resulted in a higher cost and a longer and more uncomfortable treatment. The primary symptom was relieved in 82.3% of cases, with recurrence occurring in 15.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is time-consuming, demanding, and intricate. Most patients required four to seven different types of therapy, which increased the expense, treatment duration, and suffering.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"97 3","pages":"357-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic challenges in temporomandibular disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Smaranda Buduru, Oana Almăşan, Daniela Condor, Manuela Tăut, Anca Mesaroş, Manuela Manziuc, Andreea Kui\",\"doi\":\"10.15386/mpr-2687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed at evaluating the etiology and treatment challenges of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>160 subjects with TMDs, 38 males (23.8%) and 122 females (76.3%) were studied. A personalized coefficient was designated, which included the resolution of the main symptom, correction of secondary symptoms, patient collaboration (emotional parameter), treatment duration, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent cause for consultation was muscle impairment (42.5%), or limitation of mouth opening, followed by joint impairment (23.1%). Muscle pain was noticed, particularly in the masseter (57.5%) and lateral pterygoid muscles (51.9%). Tooth pain or gingival retraction was frequently associated with tooth wear (48.1%) and dental abfraction (31.3%). Remote symptomatology was dominated by otologic symptomatology. Iatrogenic etiology was highest (69.4%), followed by untreated missing teeth (66.9%). Treatment options included muscle relaxation, occlusal balancing (equilibration), kinesitherapy, medication, and swallowing re-education. Most patients benefited from four to seven different types of therapy, which resulted in a higher cost and a longer and more uncomfortable treatment. The primary symptom was relieved in 82.3% of cases, with recurrence occurring in 15.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is time-consuming, demanding, and intricate. Most patients required four to seven different types of therapy, which increased the expense, treatment duration, and suffering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports\",\"volume\":\"97 3\",\"pages\":\"357-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的本研究旨在评估颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)的病因和治疗难题。方法:研究对象为160名TMDs患者,其中男性38名(23.8%),女性122名(76.3%)。指定了一个个性化系数,其中包括主要症状的缓解、次要症状的纠正、患者合作(情感参数)、治疗时间和费用:最常见的就诊原因是肌肉损伤(42.5%)或张口受限,其次是关节损伤(23.1%)。人们注意到肌肉疼痛,尤其是肌肉肿块(57.5%)和翼外侧肌肉(51.9%)。牙齿疼痛或牙龈萎缩通常与牙齿磨损(48.1%)和牙齿折叠(31.3%)有关。远期症状以耳科症状为主。先天性病因最多(69.4%),其次是未经治疗的缺牙(66.9%)。治疗方法包括肌肉放松、咬合平衡(平衡)、运动疗法、药物治疗和吞咽再教育。大多数患者都从四到七种不同的疗法中获益,这导致了较高的费用以及较长和较不舒适的治疗时间。82.3%的病例主要症状得到缓解,15.7%的病例复发:结论:颞下颌关节功能障碍的治疗耗时长、要求高且复杂。大多数患者需要四到七种不同的治疗方法,这增加了费用、治疗时间和痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic challenges in temporomandibular disorders.

Background and aims: This study aimed at evaluating the etiology and treatment challenges of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

Methods: 160 subjects with TMDs, 38 males (23.8%) and 122 females (76.3%) were studied. A personalized coefficient was designated, which included the resolution of the main symptom, correction of secondary symptoms, patient collaboration (emotional parameter), treatment duration, and cost.

Results: The most frequent cause for consultation was muscle impairment (42.5%), or limitation of mouth opening, followed by joint impairment (23.1%). Muscle pain was noticed, particularly in the masseter (57.5%) and lateral pterygoid muscles (51.9%). Tooth pain or gingival retraction was frequently associated with tooth wear (48.1%) and dental abfraction (31.3%). Remote symptomatology was dominated by otologic symptomatology. Iatrogenic etiology was highest (69.4%), followed by untreated missing teeth (66.9%). Treatment options included muscle relaxation, occlusal balancing (equilibration), kinesitherapy, medication, and swallowing re-education. Most patients benefited from four to seven different types of therapy, which resulted in a higher cost and a longer and more uncomfortable treatment. The primary symptom was relieved in 82.3% of cases, with recurrence occurring in 15.7%.

Conclusion: The treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is time-consuming, demanding, and intricate. Most patients required four to seven different types of therapy, which increased the expense, treatment duration, and suffering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信