超越动力极限:骨骼肌的动能容量。

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1242/jeb.247150
David Labonte, Natalie C Holt
{"title":"超越动力极限:骨骼肌的动能容量。","authors":"David Labonte, Natalie C Holt","doi":"10.1242/jeb.247150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Muscle is the universal agent of animal movement, and limits to muscle performance are therefore an integral aspect of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution. A mechanical perspective on movement makes it amenable to analysis from first principles, and so brings the seeming certitude of simple physical laws to the challenging comparative study of complex biological systems. Early contributions on movement biomechanics considered muscle energy output to be limited by muscle work capacity, Wmax; triggered by seminal work in the late 1960s, it is now held broadly that a complete analysis of muscle energy output must also consider muscle power capacity, for no unit of work can be delivered in arbitrarily brief time. Here, we adopt a critical stance towards this paradigmatic notion of a power limit, and argue that the alternative constraint to muscle energy output is imposed instead by a characteristic kinetic energy capacity, Kmax, dictated by the maximum speed with which the actuating muscle can shorten. The two critical energies can now be directly compared, and define the physiological similarity index, Γ=Kmax/Wmax. It is the explanatory power of this comparison that lends weight to a shift in perspective from muscle power to kinetic energy capacity, as is argued through a series of illustrative examples. Γ emerges as an important dimensionless number in musculoskeletal dynamics, and sparks novel hypotheses on functional adaptations in musculoskeletal 'design' that depart from the parsimonious evolutionary null hypothesis of geometric similarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond power limits: the kinetic energy capacity of skeletal muscle.\",\"authors\":\"David Labonte, Natalie C Holt\",\"doi\":\"10.1242/jeb.247150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Muscle is the universal agent of animal movement, and limits to muscle performance are therefore an integral aspect of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution. A mechanical perspective on movement makes it amenable to analysis from first principles, and so brings the seeming certitude of simple physical laws to the challenging comparative study of complex biological systems. Early contributions on movement biomechanics considered muscle energy output to be limited by muscle work capacity, Wmax; triggered by seminal work in the late 1960s, it is now held broadly that a complete analysis of muscle energy output must also consider muscle power capacity, for no unit of work can be delivered in arbitrarily brief time. Here, we adopt a critical stance towards this paradigmatic notion of a power limit, and argue that the alternative constraint to muscle energy output is imposed instead by a characteristic kinetic energy capacity, Kmax, dictated by the maximum speed with which the actuating muscle can shorten. The two critical energies can now be directly compared, and define the physiological similarity index, Γ=Kmax/Wmax. It is the explanatory power of this comparison that lends weight to a shift in perspective from muscle power to kinetic energy capacity, as is argued through a series of illustrative examples. Γ emerges as an important dimensionless number in musculoskeletal dynamics, and sparks novel hypotheses on functional adaptations in musculoskeletal 'design' that depart from the parsimonious evolutionary null hypothesis of geometric similarity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529885/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247150\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉是动物运动的普遍动力,因此,肌肉性能的极限是动物行为学、生态学和进化论不可分割的一个方面。从机械学的角度来看待运动,可以对其进行第一性原理的分析,从而将简单物理定律的貌似确定性带入复杂生物系统的挑战性比较研究中。运动生物力学的早期研究认为,肌肉能量输出受肌肉做功能力(Wmax)的限制;在 20 世纪 60 年代末的开创性工作的推动下,现在人们普遍认为,要对肌肉能量输出进行全面分析,就必须同时考虑肌肉做功能力,因为任何单位的功都不可能在任意短暂的时间内完成。在此,我们对这一动力极限的范式概念持批判态度,并认为肌肉能量输出的替代约束条件是由特征动能容量 Kmax 强加的,该动能容量由致动肌肉缩短的最大速度决定。现在可以直接比较这两种临界能量,并定义生理相似性指数 Γ=Kmax/Wmax。通过一系列简短的示例,我们可以看出这种比较的解释力有助于将视角从肌肉力量转向动能容量。Γ成为肌肉骨骼动力学中一个重要的无量纲数字,并引发了有关肌肉骨骼 "设计 "功能适应性的新假设,这些假设偏离了几何相似性的合理进化零假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond power limits: the kinetic energy capacity of skeletal muscle.

Muscle is the universal agent of animal movement, and limits to muscle performance are therefore an integral aspect of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution. A mechanical perspective on movement makes it amenable to analysis from first principles, and so brings the seeming certitude of simple physical laws to the challenging comparative study of complex biological systems. Early contributions on movement biomechanics considered muscle energy output to be limited by muscle work capacity, Wmax; triggered by seminal work in the late 1960s, it is now held broadly that a complete analysis of muscle energy output must also consider muscle power capacity, for no unit of work can be delivered in arbitrarily brief time. Here, we adopt a critical stance towards this paradigmatic notion of a power limit, and argue that the alternative constraint to muscle energy output is imposed instead by a characteristic kinetic energy capacity, Kmax, dictated by the maximum speed with which the actuating muscle can shorten. The two critical energies can now be directly compared, and define the physiological similarity index, Γ=Kmax/Wmax. It is the explanatory power of this comparison that lends weight to a shift in perspective from muscle power to kinetic energy capacity, as is argued through a series of illustrative examples. Γ emerges as an important dimensionless number in musculoskeletal dynamics, and sparks novel hypotheses on functional adaptations in musculoskeletal 'design' that depart from the parsimonious evolutionary null hypothesis of geometric similarity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信