皮秒 755 纳米紫翠宝石激光联合外用氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑的安全性和有效性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Na Zhou, Jingjing Tao, Zhen Yi, Linshan Wu, Zhenfeng Liu, Bin Yang
{"title":"皮秒 755 纳米紫翠宝石激光联合外用氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Na Zhou, Jingjing Tao, Zhen Yi, Linshan Wu, Zhenfeng Liu, Bin Yang","doi":"10.1111/jocd.16432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser and topical tranexamic acid (TA) have shown promise in treating melasma.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining to a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical TA for melasma treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients' facial halves with bilateral symmetrical melasma were randomized to receive either topical TA and picosecond laser treatment or laser monotherapy. All patients received three consecutive picosecond laser treatment sessions at 4-week intervals, and additional one side facial received topical TA treatment twice daily until 4 weeks after the third treatments. Efficacy was assessed using the Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score, VISIA (Canfield, USA) red area feature counts, and average pore volume as measured by Antera 3D®. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients completed the study. Post-treatment, mMASI scores and VISIA red area feature counts were lower in combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves, and average melanin level was lower in the combination therapy halves (p < 0.05). Comparisons between the combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves after the third treatment revealed significant differences in mMASI scores, melanin levels, and VISIA red area feature counts (p < 0.05). After treatment, patient satisfaction rates in the combination therapy halves and monotherapy halves was 71.4% and 54.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). No obvious adverse effects were observed in the combination therapy halves; whereas, 10.42% (5/48) of participants in the laser monotherapy halves experienced temporary pigmentation, which resolved within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser, when used independently and in combination with topical TA, has been proven to be effective in the improvement of melasma. However, the combined treatment approach showed a more pronounced improvement in melasma symptoms, with higher patient satisfaction, and was associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects. These findings strongly support that integrating topical TA with picosecond laser therapy as a superior therapeutic strategy for melasma management.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200057771.</p>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma.\",\"authors\":\"Na Zhou, Jingjing Tao, Zhen Yi, Linshan Wu, Zhenfeng Liu, Bin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocd.16432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser and topical tranexamic acid (TA) have shown promise in treating melasma.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining to a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical TA for melasma treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients' facial halves with bilateral symmetrical melasma were randomized to receive either topical TA and picosecond laser treatment or laser monotherapy. All patients received three consecutive picosecond laser treatment sessions at 4-week intervals, and additional one side facial received topical TA treatment twice daily until 4 weeks after the third treatments. Efficacy was assessed using the Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score, VISIA (Canfield, USA) red area feature counts, and average pore volume as measured by Antera 3D®. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients completed the study. Post-treatment, mMASI scores and VISIA red area feature counts were lower in combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves, and average melanin level was lower in the combination therapy halves (p < 0.05). Comparisons between the combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves after the third treatment revealed significant differences in mMASI scores, melanin levels, and VISIA red area feature counts (p < 0.05). After treatment, patient satisfaction rates in the combination therapy halves and monotherapy halves was 71.4% and 54.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). No obvious adverse effects were observed in the combination therapy halves; whereas, 10.42% (5/48) of participants in the laser monotherapy halves experienced temporary pigmentation, which resolved within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser, when used independently and in combination with topical TA, has been proven to be effective in the improvement of melasma. However, the combined treatment approach showed a more pronounced improvement in melasma symptoms, with higher patient satisfaction, and was associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects. These findings strongly support that integrating topical TA with picosecond laser therapy as a superior therapeutic strategy for melasma management.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200057771.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16432\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:本研究旨在评估皮秒755纳米紫翠宝石激光联合外用氨甲环酸(TA)治疗黄褐斑的有效性和安全性:48名患有双侧对称性黄褐斑的患者被随机分配接受局部TA和皮秒激光治疗或单一激光治疗。所有患者都接受了三次连续的皮秒激光治疗,每次治疗间隔四周,另外一侧面部接受外用TA治疗,每天两次,直到第三次治疗后四周。疗效评估采用改良黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(mMASI)评分、VISIA(美国坎菲尔德公司)红色区域特征计数和 Antera 3D® 测量的平均毛孔体积。患者满意度通过问卷调查进行评估:结果:35 名患者完成了研究。治疗后,联合疗法半数和激光单一疗法半数的 mMASI 评分和 VISIA 红色区域特征计数均较低,联合疗法半数的平均黑色素水平较低(P事实证明,皮秒 755 纳米紫翠宝石激光单独使用或与局部 TA 联合使用,都能有效改善黄褐斑。然而,联合治疗方法对黄褐斑症状的改善更明显,患者满意度更高,不良反应发生率更低。这些研究结果有力地证明,将局部TA治疗与皮秒激光治疗相结合是治疗黄褐斑的一种更优越的治疗策略:临床试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:临床试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2200057771。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma.

Background: The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser and topical tranexamic acid (TA) have shown promise in treating melasma.

Aim: This aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining to a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical TA for melasma treatment.

Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients' facial halves with bilateral symmetrical melasma were randomized to receive either topical TA and picosecond laser treatment or laser monotherapy. All patients received three consecutive picosecond laser treatment sessions at 4-week intervals, and additional one side facial received topical TA treatment twice daily until 4 weeks after the third treatments. Efficacy was assessed using the Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score, VISIA (Canfield, USA) red area feature counts, and average pore volume as measured by Antera 3D®. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through questionnaires.

Results: Thirty-five patients completed the study. Post-treatment, mMASI scores and VISIA red area feature counts were lower in combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves, and average melanin level was lower in the combination therapy halves (p < 0.05). Comparisons between the combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves after the third treatment revealed significant differences in mMASI scores, melanin levels, and VISIA red area feature counts (p < 0.05). After treatment, patient satisfaction rates in the combination therapy halves and monotherapy halves was 71.4% and 54.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). No obvious adverse effects were observed in the combination therapy halves; whereas, 10.42% (5/48) of participants in the laser monotherapy halves experienced temporary pigmentation, which resolved within 3 months.

Conclusion: The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser, when used independently and in combination with topical TA, has been proven to be effective in the improvement of melasma. However, the combined treatment approach showed a more pronounced improvement in melasma symptoms, with higher patient satisfaction, and was associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects. These findings strongly support that integrating topical TA with picosecond laser therapy as a superior therapeutic strategy for melasma management.

Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200057771.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信