与 65,741 名首次使用选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的抑郁症治疗结果相关的社会人口学和临床因素:一项针对老年人的丹麦队列研究。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"与 65,741 名首次使用选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的抑郁症治疗结果相关的社会人口学和临床因素:一项针对老年人的丹麦队列研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate a wide range of sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with treatment outcomes in older adults who initiated an SSRI for depression treatment in a real-world setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cohort study used Danish registry data covering all older adults (aged ≥65) who initiated SSRIs for depression from 2006 to 2017, first-time (since 1995). We followed the individuals for one year after their SSRI prescription. Six different outcomes were analyzed, including treatment discontinuation, switching, augmentation, psychiatric hospital contacts for depression, psychiatric hospital admission, and suicide attempt/self-harm. Association analyses employed Poisson regression, estimating incidence rate ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 65,741 individuals with a mean age of 78.23 years, and 55.6 % were females. During follow-up, 40.1 % discontinued, 4.8 % switched, 20.3 % received augmentation, 3.0 % had psychiatric hospital contacts for depression, 3.2 % had psychiatric admission, and 0.1 % had suicide attempt/self-harm records. Differential treatment outcomes were observed based on sociodemographic and clinical factors. For example, being female, residing predominantly in rural areas, having psychiatric or somatic diagnoses, and using medications acting on blood/blood-forming organs, the cardiovascular system, or musculo-skeletal systems were linked to fewer unfavorable clinical outcomes. Conversely, marital status as being single or separated and the use of nervous system drugs were associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Confounding by indication might remain a problem, and depression severity data was not unavailable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings emphasize considering patient characteristics in clinical decisions, as they can influence the clinical course of those undergoing depression treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014770/pdfft?md5=5ac159355f99a9284502bdbb5433ff59&pid=1-s2.0-S0165032724014770-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographics and clinical factors associated with depression treatment outcomes in 65,741 first-time users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A Danish cohort study in older adults\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate a wide range of sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with treatment outcomes in older adults who initiated an SSRI for depression treatment in a real-world setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cohort study used Danish registry data covering all older adults (aged ≥65) who initiated SSRIs for depression from 2006 to 2017, first-time (since 1995). We followed the individuals for one year after their SSRI prescription. Six different outcomes were analyzed, including treatment discontinuation, switching, augmentation, psychiatric hospital contacts for depression, psychiatric hospital admission, and suicide attempt/self-harm. Association analyses employed Poisson regression, estimating incidence rate ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 65,741 individuals with a mean age of 78.23 years, and 55.6 % were females. During follow-up, 40.1 % discontinued, 4.8 % switched, 20.3 % received augmentation, 3.0 % had psychiatric hospital contacts for depression, 3.2 % had psychiatric admission, and 0.1 % had suicide attempt/self-harm records. Differential treatment outcomes were observed based on sociodemographic and clinical factors. For example, being female, residing predominantly in rural areas, having psychiatric or somatic diagnoses, and using medications acting on blood/blood-forming organs, the cardiovascular system, or musculo-skeletal systems were linked to fewer unfavorable clinical outcomes. Conversely, marital status as being single or separated and the use of nervous system drugs were associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Confounding by indication might remain a problem, and depression severity data was not unavailable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings emphasize considering patient characteristics in clinical decisions, as they can influence the clinical course of those undergoing depression treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014770/pdfft?md5=5ac159355f99a9284502bdbb5433ff59&pid=1-s2.0-S0165032724014770-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要调查在真实世界环境中开始使用 SSRI 治疗抑郁症的老年人中与治疗结果相关的各种社会人口和临床因素:这项队列研究使用了丹麦的登记数据,涵盖了 2006 年至 2017 年间首次(自 1995 年起)开始使用 SSRI 治疗抑郁症的所有老年人(年龄≥65 岁)。在开具 SSRI 处方后,我们对这些人进行了为期一年的跟踪调查。我们对六种不同的结果进行了分析,包括治疗中断、转换、增强、因抑郁症入住精神病院、入住精神病院和自杀未遂/自残。关联分析采用泊松回归法,估算出发病率比值及 95% 的置信区间:研究对象包括 65 741 人,平均年龄为 78.23 岁,其中 55.6% 为女性。在随访过程中,40.1%的患者中断了治疗,4.8%的患者更换了治疗方案,20.3%的患者接受了增效治疗,3.0%的患者曾因抑郁症入住精神病院,3.2%的患者曾被精神病院收治,0.1%的患者有自杀未遂/自残记录。根据社会人口和临床因素观察到了不同的治疗结果。例如,女性、主要居住在农村地区、有精神病或躯体疾病诊断以及使用作用于血液/造血器官、心血管系统或肌肉骨骼系统的药物与较少的不利临床结果有关。相反,单身或分居的婚姻状况以及使用神经系统药物则与较高的不良后果风险相关:局限性:适应症可能仍是一个问题,抑郁严重程度的数据尚未获得:我们的研究结果强调在临床决策中要考虑患者的特征,因为这些特征会影响抑郁症患者的临床治疗过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociodemographics and clinical factors associated with depression treatment outcomes in 65,741 first-time users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A Danish cohort study in older adults

Objective

To investigate a wide range of sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with treatment outcomes in older adults who initiated an SSRI for depression treatment in a real-world setting.

Methods

This cohort study used Danish registry data covering all older adults (aged ≥65) who initiated SSRIs for depression from 2006 to 2017, first-time (since 1995). We followed the individuals for one year after their SSRI prescription. Six different outcomes were analyzed, including treatment discontinuation, switching, augmentation, psychiatric hospital contacts for depression, psychiatric hospital admission, and suicide attempt/self-harm. Association analyses employed Poisson regression, estimating incidence rate ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

The study included 65,741 individuals with a mean age of 78.23 years, and 55.6 % were females. During follow-up, 40.1 % discontinued, 4.8 % switched, 20.3 % received augmentation, 3.0 % had psychiatric hospital contacts for depression, 3.2 % had psychiatric admission, and 0.1 % had suicide attempt/self-harm records. Differential treatment outcomes were observed based on sociodemographic and clinical factors. For example, being female, residing predominantly in rural areas, having psychiatric or somatic diagnoses, and using medications acting on blood/blood-forming organs, the cardiovascular system, or musculo-skeletal systems were linked to fewer unfavorable clinical outcomes. Conversely, marital status as being single or separated and the use of nervous system drugs were associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.

Limitations

Confounding by indication might remain a problem, and depression severity data was not unavailable.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasize considering patient characteristics in clinical decisions, as they can influence the clinical course of those undergoing depression treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信