非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI)的功能在性别不符青年和顺性别青年中的异同。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI)的功能在性别不符青年和顺性别青年中的异同。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) can be motivated by a broad range of functions and many individuals report multiple reasons for self-injuring. Most NSSI research has involved predominantly female samples and few studies have examined gender similarities and differences in function endorsement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We characterise the prevalence and versatility of NSSI functions within a gender-diverse online sample of cisgender women (cis-women<em>; n</em> = 280), cisgender men (cis-men<em>; n</em> = 176), and transgender, non-binary, and other gender non-conforming young adults (TGNC; <em>n</em> = 80) age 18–30 (<em>M</em> = 23.73, <em>SD</em> = 3.55). The Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (OSI-F) assessed 24 intrapersonal and social functions across nine domains: affect regulation, self-punishment, anti-dissociation, anti-suicide, sensation seeking, sexuality, interpersonal influence, and body image.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TGNC participants and cis-women were significantly more likely to report intrapersonally motivated NSSI and greater function versatility than cis-men. Low mood, emotional distress, suicidality, and trauma symptomology appeared to contribute to gender differences in function endorsement. Gender similarities also emerged; across groups, intrapersonal functions were substantially more common than social functions, and the most endorsed domains were affect regulation and self-punishment. No domains were gender specific.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The OSI-F was developed from majority female samples and may not adequately capture the experiences of other gender groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Interventions which reduce distress and strengthen emotion regulation are likely to benefit individuals who self-injure regardless of gender. However, most individuals report multiple NSSI functions and person-centred interventions which address this complexity are needed. Future research should develop gender-informed treatment models which consider the unique experiences of TGNC individuals and cis-men who self-injure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014526/pdfft?md5=5ee70b8d7331ccb57a01403c3cd896e9&pid=1-s2.0-S0165032724014526-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similarities and differences in the functions of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) across gender non-conforming and cisgender young adults\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) can be motivated by a broad range of functions and many individuals report multiple reasons for self-injuring. Most NSSI research has involved predominantly female samples and few studies have examined gender similarities and differences in function endorsement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We characterise the prevalence and versatility of NSSI functions within a gender-diverse online sample of cisgender women (cis-women<em>; n</em> = 280), cisgender men (cis-men<em>; n</em> = 176), and transgender, non-binary, and other gender non-conforming young adults (TGNC; <em>n</em> = 80) age 18–30 (<em>M</em> = 23.73, <em>SD</em> = 3.55). The Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (OSI-F) assessed 24 intrapersonal and social functions across nine domains: affect regulation, self-punishment, anti-dissociation, anti-suicide, sensation seeking, sexuality, interpersonal influence, and body image.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TGNC participants and cis-women were significantly more likely to report intrapersonally motivated NSSI and greater function versatility than cis-men. Low mood, emotional distress, suicidality, and trauma symptomology appeared to contribute to gender differences in function endorsement. Gender similarities also emerged; across groups, intrapersonal functions were substantially more common than social functions, and the most endorsed domains were affect regulation and self-punishment. No domains were gender specific.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The OSI-F was developed from majority female samples and may not adequately capture the experiences of other gender groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Interventions which reduce distress and strengthen emotion regulation are likely to benefit individuals who self-injure regardless of gender. However, most individuals report multiple NSSI functions and person-centred interventions which address this complexity are needed. Future research should develop gender-informed treatment models which consider the unique experiences of TGNC individuals and cis-men who self-injure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014526/pdfft?md5=5ee70b8d7331ccb57a01403c3cd896e9&pid=1-s2.0-S0165032724014526-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI)的动机可以是多种功能,许多人报告说自我伤害有多种原因。大多数 NSSI 研究主要涉及女性样本,很少有研究探讨了功能认可方面的性别相似性和差异:方法:我们在一个性别多元化的在线样本中描述了 NSSI 功能的普遍性和多样性,样本包括 18-30 岁的顺性别女性(cis-women;n = 280)、顺性别男性(cis-men;n = 176)以及跨性别、非二元性和其他性别不符的年轻成年人(TGNC;n = 80)(M = 23.73,SD = 3.55)。渥太华自伤量表(OSI-F)评估了9个领域的24项个人和社会功能:情绪调节、自我惩罚、反分离、反自杀、寻求感觉、性、人际影响和身体形象:结果发现:与男性相比,女性同性恋者和男性同性恋者更有可能报告出于人际动机的 NSSI 行为和更多的功能多变性。低落情绪、情绪困扰、自杀和创伤症状似乎是造成功能认可性别差异的原因。此外,还出现了性别相似性;在不同的群体中,人际功能比社会功能更为常见,最被认可的领域是情感调节和自我惩罚。没有任何领域具有性别特异性:局限性:OSI-F 是根据大多数女性样本开发的,可能无法充分反映其他性别群体的经历:无论性别如何,减少痛苦和加强情绪调节的干预措施都可能使自我伤害者受益。然而,大多数人都报告了多种 NSSI 功能,因此需要针对这种复杂性采取以人为本的干预措施。未来的研究应开发考虑到性别差异的治疗模式,这些模式应考虑到女性同性恋者、男性同性恋者和自我伤害者的独特经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Similarities and differences in the functions of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) across gender non-conforming and cisgender young adults

Background

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) can be motivated by a broad range of functions and many individuals report multiple reasons for self-injuring. Most NSSI research has involved predominantly female samples and few studies have examined gender similarities and differences in function endorsement.

Methods

We characterise the prevalence and versatility of NSSI functions within a gender-diverse online sample of cisgender women (cis-women; n = 280), cisgender men (cis-men; n = 176), and transgender, non-binary, and other gender non-conforming young adults (TGNC; n = 80) age 18–30 (M = 23.73, SD = 3.55). The Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (OSI-F) assessed 24 intrapersonal and social functions across nine domains: affect regulation, self-punishment, anti-dissociation, anti-suicide, sensation seeking, sexuality, interpersonal influence, and body image.

Results

TGNC participants and cis-women were significantly more likely to report intrapersonally motivated NSSI and greater function versatility than cis-men. Low mood, emotional distress, suicidality, and trauma symptomology appeared to contribute to gender differences in function endorsement. Gender similarities also emerged; across groups, intrapersonal functions were substantially more common than social functions, and the most endorsed domains were affect regulation and self-punishment. No domains were gender specific.

Limitations

The OSI-F was developed from majority female samples and may not adequately capture the experiences of other gender groups.

Conclusions

Interventions which reduce distress and strengthen emotion regulation are likely to benefit individuals who self-injure regardless of gender. However, most individuals report multiple NSSI functions and person-centred interventions which address this complexity are needed. Future research should develop gender-informed treatment models which consider the unique experiences of TGNC individuals and cis-men who self-injure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信