在意外用药过量死亡病例中,通过尸检浸量尺检测评估死后尿液中芬太尼的检测情况。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Anson Tsang, Luke N Rodda
{"title":"在意外用药过量死亡病例中,通过尸检浸量尺检测评估死后尿液中芬太尼的检测情况。","authors":"Anson Tsang, Luke N Rodda","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"667-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths.\",\"authors\":\"Anson Tsang, Luke N Rodda\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"667-671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于阿片类药物在美国的流行,即芬太尼的广泛供应和使用,意外用药过量病例持续上升。全国各地的法医和验尸官也因此不堪重负,在资源有限的情况下,一些人寻求其他分流程序来识别用药过量。在尸检时进行护理点尿液浸量棒检测就是这样一种思路,它可以通过各种方式促进或消除尸检或常规法医毒理学实验室检测的必要性。本研究调查了与芬太尼相关的意外用药过量死亡病例死后尿液中芬太尼和诺芬太尼的频率和估计定量浓度,以及基于此类浓度的市售照护点尿液量筒检测的有效性。共对 1550 例与芬太尼相关的意外用药过量病例进行了复查,对死后外周股骨血液和尿液都进行了检测。其中,使用灵敏的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS-MS)实验室检测,有 82 例(5%)在血液中检测出芬太尼或诺芬太尼呈阳性,而在尿液中仍未检测出芬太尼或诺芬太尼。此外,通过比较市售尿液浸量棒检测临界值和真实病例的估计尿液浓度发现,当芬太尼/诺芬太尼临界值为 5 纳克/毫升时,19% 与芬太尼相关的意外过量会导致假阴性,24% 为 10 纳克/毫升,25% 为 20 纳克/毫升,51% 为 50 纳克/毫升,61% 为 100 纳克/毫升。研究发现,在芬太尼意外过量中毒事件中,使用尿液浸量棒检测作为启动进一步全面常规毒理学实验室检测的决策者,或作为确定死因和死亡方式的支持,会导致假阳性和假阴性预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths.

Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信