利用机器学习通过计算机断层扫描衍生斑块测量和临床参数预测长期重大心脏不良事件。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.3566-24
Shinichi Wada, Makino Sakuraba, Michikazu Nakai, Takayuki Suzuki, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Teruo Noguchi, Yoshitaka Iwanaga
{"title":"利用机器学习通过计算机断层扫描衍生斑块测量和临床参数预测长期重大心脏不良事件。","authors":"Shinichi Wada, Makino Sakuraba, Michikazu Nakai, Takayuki Suzuki, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Teruo Noguchi, Yoshitaka Iwanaga","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.3566-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective The present study evaluated the usefulness of machine learning (ML) models with the coronary computed tomography imaging and clinical parameters for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The Nationwide Gender-specific Atherosclerosis Determinants Estimation and Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease Prospective Cohort study (NADESICO) of 1,187 patients with suspected coronary artery disease 50-74 years old was used to build a MACE prediction model. The ML random forest (RF) model was compared with a logistic regression analysis. The performance of the ML model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Among 1,178 patients from the NADESICO dataset, MACEs occurred in 103 (8.7%) patients during a median follow-up of 4.4 years. The AUC of the RF model for MACE prediction was 0.781 (95% CI: 0.670-0.870), which was significantly higher than that of the conventional logistic regression model [AUC, 0.750 (95% CI: 0.651-0.839)]. The important features in the RF model were coronary artery stenosis (CAS) at any site, CAS in the left anterior descending branch, HbA1c level, CAS in the right coronary artery, and sex. In the external validation cohort, the model accuracy of ensemble ML-RF models that were trained on and tuned using the NADESICO dataset was not similar [AUC: 0.635 (95% CI: 0.599-0.672)]. Conclusion The ML-RF model improved the long-term prediction of MACEs compared to the logistic regression model. However, the selected variables in the internal dataset were not highly predictive of the external dataset. Further investigations are required to validate the usefulness of this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1001-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Major Adverse Cardiac Event Prediction by Computed Tomography-derived Plaque Measures and Clinical Parameters Using Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Wada, Makino Sakuraba, Michikazu Nakai, Takayuki Suzuki, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Teruo Noguchi, Yoshitaka Iwanaga\",\"doi\":\"10.2169/internalmedicine.3566-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective The present study evaluated the usefulness of machine learning (ML) models with the coronary computed tomography imaging and clinical parameters for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The Nationwide Gender-specific Atherosclerosis Determinants Estimation and Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease Prospective Cohort study (NADESICO) of 1,187 patients with suspected coronary artery disease 50-74 years old was used to build a MACE prediction model. The ML random forest (RF) model was compared with a logistic regression analysis. The performance of the ML model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Among 1,178 patients from the NADESICO dataset, MACEs occurred in 103 (8.7%) patients during a median follow-up of 4.4 years. The AUC of the RF model for MACE prediction was 0.781 (95% CI: 0.670-0.870), which was significantly higher than that of the conventional logistic regression model [AUC, 0.750 (95% CI: 0.651-0.839)]. The important features in the RF model were coronary artery stenosis (CAS) at any site, CAS in the left anterior descending branch, HbA1c level, CAS in the right coronary artery, and sex. In the external validation cohort, the model accuracy of ensemble ML-RF models that were trained on and tuned using the NADESICO dataset was not similar [AUC: 0.635 (95% CI: 0.599-0.672)]. Conclusion The ML-RF model improved the long-term prediction of MACEs compared to the logistic regression model. However, the selected variables in the internal dataset were not highly predictive of the external dataset. Further investigations are required to validate the usefulness of this model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1001-1008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.3566-24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.3566-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究评估了带有冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)和临床参数的机器学习(ML)模型在预测重大心脏不良事件(MACE)方面的作用。方法 使用全国性别动脉粥样硬化决定因素估计和缺血性心血管疾病前瞻性队列研究(NADESICO)中 1,187 名 50-74 岁疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者建立 MACE 预测模型。ML 随机森林 (RF) 模型与逻辑回归分析进行了比较。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和 95% 置信区间(CI)评估了 ML 模型的性能。结果 在NADESICO数据集中的1178名患者中,有103名患者(8.7%)在中位4.4年的随访期间发生了MACE。RF模型预测MACE的AUC为0.781(95% CI:0.670-0.870),明显高于传统逻辑回归模型[AUC,0.750(95% CI,0.651-0.839)]。RF模型的重要特征是任何部位的冠状动脉狭窄(CAS)、左前降支CAS、HbA1c水平、右冠状动脉CAS和性别。在外部验证队列中,使用 NADESICO 数据集训练和调整的集合 ML-RF 模型的准确性并不相似[AUC:0.635(95% CI:0.599-0.672)]。结论 与逻辑回归模型相比,ML-RF 模型改善了对 MACE 的长期预测。然而,内部数据集中的选定变量对外部数据集的预测性并不高。需要进一步研究以验证该模型的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term Major Adverse Cardiac Event Prediction by Computed Tomography-derived Plaque Measures and Clinical Parameters Using Machine Learning.

Objective The present study evaluated the usefulness of machine learning (ML) models with the coronary computed tomography imaging and clinical parameters for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The Nationwide Gender-specific Atherosclerosis Determinants Estimation and Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease Prospective Cohort study (NADESICO) of 1,187 patients with suspected coronary artery disease 50-74 years old was used to build a MACE prediction model. The ML random forest (RF) model was compared with a logistic regression analysis. The performance of the ML model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Among 1,178 patients from the NADESICO dataset, MACEs occurred in 103 (8.7%) patients during a median follow-up of 4.4 years. The AUC of the RF model for MACE prediction was 0.781 (95% CI: 0.670-0.870), which was significantly higher than that of the conventional logistic regression model [AUC, 0.750 (95% CI: 0.651-0.839)]. The important features in the RF model were coronary artery stenosis (CAS) at any site, CAS in the left anterior descending branch, HbA1c level, CAS in the right coronary artery, and sex. In the external validation cohort, the model accuracy of ensemble ML-RF models that were trained on and tuned using the NADESICO dataset was not similar [AUC: 0.635 (95% CI: 0.599-0.672)]. Conclusion The ML-RF model improved the long-term prediction of MACEs compared to the logistic regression model. However, the selected variables in the internal dataset were not highly predictive of the external dataset. Further investigations are required to validate the usefulness of this model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信