基于不同地理种群中肠道微生物群的变化,探索普氏原羚的种群相互作用。

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439554
Jingjie Zhang, Pengfei Song, Feng Jiang, Tongzuo Zhang
{"title":"基于不同地理种群中肠道微生物群的变化,探索普氏原羚的种群相互作用。","authors":"Jingjie Zhang, Pengfei Song, Feng Jiang, Tongzuo Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The differences in gut microbiota among different populations, to a certain extent, reflect the degree of interaction between individuals within populations. To assess the interaction levels among several small populations of Przewalski's gazelle (<i>Procapra przewalskii</i>) (<i>n</i> = 105, from seven different regions) based on differences in gut microbiota, we used the closely related Tibetan gazelle (<i>P. picticaudata</i>) (<i>n</i> = 52, from seven different regions) as a control. We then compared the gut microbial communities between different populations of the two species using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The results showed that within a 100 km geographical distance, the intergroup differences in relative abundance of dominant bacteria, α-diversity, β-diversity, and functional metabolism abundance were higher or significantly higher in Przewalski's gazelle (narrowly distributed species) compared to the Tibetan gazelle (widely distributed species). Additionally, the proportion of shared OTUs between groups in Przewalski's gazelle was significantly lower than in Tibetan gazelle (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, neutral community model results also showed lower dispersal limitation in the Tibetan gazelle compared to Przewalski's gazelle. Therefore, based on the above results, we comprehensively speculate that the spatial interaction degree of Przewalski's gazelle in different habitat patches is relatively low. This study, starting from the perspective of gut microbiota, adopts a non-genetic perspective or method to assess whether there is, or to what extent there is, close interaction between species populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the population interaction of Przewalski's gazelle (<i>Procapra przewalskii</i>) based on the variations in gut microbiota across diverse geographic populations.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjie Zhang, Pengfei Song, Feng Jiang, Tongzuo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The differences in gut microbiota among different populations, to a certain extent, reflect the degree of interaction between individuals within populations. To assess the interaction levels among several small populations of Przewalski's gazelle (<i>Procapra przewalskii</i>) (<i>n</i> = 105, from seven different regions) based on differences in gut microbiota, we used the closely related Tibetan gazelle (<i>P. picticaudata</i>) (<i>n</i> = 52, from seven different regions) as a control. We then compared the gut microbial communities between different populations of the two species using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The results showed that within a 100 km geographical distance, the intergroup differences in relative abundance of dominant bacteria, α-diversity, β-diversity, and functional metabolism abundance were higher or significantly higher in Przewalski's gazelle (narrowly distributed species) compared to the Tibetan gazelle (widely distributed species). Additionally, the proportion of shared OTUs between groups in Przewalski's gazelle was significantly lower than in Tibetan gazelle (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, neutral community model results also showed lower dispersal limitation in the Tibetan gazelle compared to Przewalski's gazelle. Therefore, based on the above results, we comprehensively speculate that the spatial interaction degree of Przewalski's gazelle in different habitat patches is relatively low. This study, starting from the perspective of gut microbiota, adopts a non-genetic perspective or method to assess whether there is, or to what extent there is, close interaction between species populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439554\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同种群之间肠道微生物群的差异在一定程度上反映了种群内个体之间的相互作用程度。为了根据肠道微生物群的差异评估普氏原羚(Procapra przewalskii)几个小种群(n = 105,来自七个不同地区)之间的相互作用水平,我们使用了近缘的藏原羚(P. picticaudata)(n = 52,来自七个不同地区)作为对照。然后,我们利用 16S rRNA 基因的高通量测序技术比较了这两个物种不同种群之间的肠道微生物群落。结果表明,在100公里的地理距离内,普氏原羚(狭义分布物种)与藏原羚(广义分布物种)相比,优势菌的相对丰度、α-多样性、β-多样性和功能代谢丰度的组间差异都更高或显著更高。此外,普氏原羚群体间共享 OTU 的比例明显低于藏原羚(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the population interaction of Przewalski's gazelle (Procapra przewalskii) based on the variations in gut microbiota across diverse geographic populations.

The differences in gut microbiota among different populations, to a certain extent, reflect the degree of interaction between individuals within populations. To assess the interaction levels among several small populations of Przewalski's gazelle (Procapra przewalskii) (n = 105, from seven different regions) based on differences in gut microbiota, we used the closely related Tibetan gazelle (P. picticaudata) (n = 52, from seven different regions) as a control. We then compared the gut microbial communities between different populations of the two species using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The results showed that within a 100 km geographical distance, the intergroup differences in relative abundance of dominant bacteria, α-diversity, β-diversity, and functional metabolism abundance were higher or significantly higher in Przewalski's gazelle (narrowly distributed species) compared to the Tibetan gazelle (widely distributed species). Additionally, the proportion of shared OTUs between groups in Przewalski's gazelle was significantly lower than in Tibetan gazelle (p < 0.05). Additionally, neutral community model results also showed lower dispersal limitation in the Tibetan gazelle compared to Przewalski's gazelle. Therefore, based on the above results, we comprehensively speculate that the spatial interaction degree of Przewalski's gazelle in different habitat patches is relatively low. This study, starting from the perspective of gut microbiota, adopts a non-genetic perspective or method to assess whether there is, or to what extent there is, close interaction between species populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信