急性血流限制阻力运动对健康成年人体感诱发电位的影响。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Tom Maudrich, Sebastian Degener, Patrick Ragert, Rouven Kenville
{"title":"急性血流限制阻力运动对健康成年人体感诱发电位的影响。","authors":"Tom Maudrich,&nbsp;Sebastian Degener,&nbsp;Patrick Ragert,&nbsp;Rouven Kenville","doi":"10.1113/EP091911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blood-flow-restriction exercise (BFR<sub>EX</sub>) is an emerging method to stimulate hypertrophy and strength without the need for high training loads. However, the impact of BFR<sub>EX</sub> concerning somatosensory processing remains elusive. Here, we aimed to investigate the acute effects of BFR<sub>EX</sub> on somatosensory processing in healthy adults using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). Twelve healthy adults (23.0 ± 3.2 years of age) participated in a randomized crossover experiment, consisting of three experimental conditions: application of blood-flow restriction without resistance exercise (BFR), resistance exercise for multiple sets with blood-flow restriction (BFR<sub>EX</sub>) and traditional resistance exercise (unilateral biceps curls) for multiple sets without BFR (EX). SEP measurements were recorded bilaterally before, during and after each condition. SEP amplitudes were largely unaffected during various occlusive conditions. Nonetheless, our findings demonstrate a significant decrease in N9 latencies for condition EX compared with BFR, specifically in the exercised limb (mean difference = −0.26 ms, SE = 0.06 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>d</i> = −0.335). This study provides evidence on the lack of impact of BFR<sub>EX</sub> within the somatosensory domain, according to current guidelines. As an alternative method to traditional high-load resistance exercise, BFR<sub>EX</sub> might offer a considerable upside for rehabilitative settings by reducing strain on the musculoskeletal system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":"109 11","pages":"1869-1881"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/EP091911","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults\",\"authors\":\"Tom Maudrich,&nbsp;Sebastian Degener,&nbsp;Patrick Ragert,&nbsp;Rouven Kenville\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP091911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Blood-flow-restriction exercise (BFR<sub>EX</sub>) is an emerging method to stimulate hypertrophy and strength without the need for high training loads. However, the impact of BFR<sub>EX</sub> concerning somatosensory processing remains elusive. Here, we aimed to investigate the acute effects of BFR<sub>EX</sub> on somatosensory processing in healthy adults using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). Twelve healthy adults (23.0 ± 3.2 years of age) participated in a randomized crossover experiment, consisting of three experimental conditions: application of blood-flow restriction without resistance exercise (BFR), resistance exercise for multiple sets with blood-flow restriction (BFR<sub>EX</sub>) and traditional resistance exercise (unilateral biceps curls) for multiple sets without BFR (EX). SEP measurements were recorded bilaterally before, during and after each condition. SEP amplitudes were largely unaffected during various occlusive conditions. Nonetheless, our findings demonstrate a significant decrease in N9 latencies for condition EX compared with BFR, specifically in the exercised limb (mean difference = −0.26 ms, SE = 0.06 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>d</i> = −0.335). This study provides evidence on the lack of impact of BFR<sub>EX</sub> within the somatosensory domain, according to current guidelines. As an alternative method to traditional high-load resistance exercise, BFR<sub>EX</sub> might offer a considerable upside for rehabilitative settings by reducing strain on the musculoskeletal system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\"109 11\",\"pages\":\"1869-1881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/EP091911\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血流限制运动(BFREX)是一种新兴的方法,可在无需高负荷训练的情况下刺激肥大和力量。然而,BFREX 对躯体感觉处理的影响仍然难以捉摸。在这里,我们旨在使用体感诱发电位(SEPs)研究 BFREX 对健康成年人体感处理的急性影响。12 名健康成年人(23.0±3.2 岁)参加了随机交叉实验,实验包括三种条件:不进行阻力运动的血流限制(BFR)、多组血流限制阻力运动(BFREX)和多组不进行 BFR 的传统阻力运动(单侧二头肌卷曲)(EX)。在每个条件之前、期间和之后,均记录了双侧 SEP 测量值。在各种闭塞条件下,SEP 振幅基本不受影响。然而,我们的研究结果表明,与 BFR 相比,EX 条件下的 N9 潜伏期显著缩短,尤其是在锻炼肢体上(平均差异 = -0.26 ms,SE = 0.06 ms,P = 0.002,d = -0.335)。这项研究提供的证据表明,根据现行指南,BFREX 对躯体感觉领域没有影响。作为传统高负荷阻力运动的替代方法,BFREX 可减少对肌肉骨骼系统的负荷,从而为康复治疗提供可观的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults

The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults

Blood-flow-restriction exercise (BFREX) is an emerging method to stimulate hypertrophy and strength without the need for high training loads. However, the impact of BFREX concerning somatosensory processing remains elusive. Here, we aimed to investigate the acute effects of BFREX on somatosensory processing in healthy adults using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). Twelve healthy adults (23.0 ± 3.2 years of age) participated in a randomized crossover experiment, consisting of three experimental conditions: application of blood-flow restriction without resistance exercise (BFR), resistance exercise for multiple sets with blood-flow restriction (BFREX) and traditional resistance exercise (unilateral biceps curls) for multiple sets without BFR (EX). SEP measurements were recorded bilaterally before, during and after each condition. SEP amplitudes were largely unaffected during various occlusive conditions. Nonetheless, our findings demonstrate a significant decrease in N9 latencies for condition EX compared with BFR, specifically in the exercised limb (mean difference = −0.26 ms, SE = 0.06 ms, P = 0.002, d = −0.335). This study provides evidence on the lack of impact of BFREX within the somatosensory domain, according to current guidelines. As an alternative method to traditional high-load resistance exercise, BFREX might offer a considerable upside for rehabilitative settings by reducing strain on the musculoskeletal system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信