人工智能辅助自动筛查来自不同扫描仪的计算机断层扫描图像中的机会性骨质疏松症。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11046-2
Yan Wu, Xiaopeng Yang, Mingyue Wang, Yanbang Lian, Ping Hou, Xiangfei Chai, Qiong Dai, Baoxin Qian, Yaojun Jiang, Jianbo Gao
{"title":"人工智能辅助自动筛查来自不同扫描仪的计算机断层扫描图像中的机会性骨质疏松症。","authors":"Yan Wu, Xiaopeng Yang, Mingyue Wang, Yanbang Lian, Ping Hou, Xiangfei Chai, Qiong Dai, Baoxin Qian, Yaojun Jiang, Jianbo Gao","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11046-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is feasible to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and detect osteoporosis through an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system by using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a reference without additional radiation exposure or cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deep-learning model developed based on 3312 low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) scans (trained with 2337 and tested with 975) achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 95.8% for T1-T12, L1, and L2 vertebral body (VB) segmentation on test data. We performed a model evaluation based on 4401 LDCT scans (obtained from scanners of 3 different manufacturers as external validation data). The BMD values of all individuals were extracted from three consecutive VBs: T12 to L2. Line regression and Bland‒Altman analyses were used to evaluate the overall detection performance. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the QCT results as the diagnostic standard, the BMD assessed had a mean error of (- 0.28, 2.37) mg/cm<sup>3</sup>. Overall, the sensitivity of a normal diagnosis was greater than that of a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. For the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the model achieved a sensitivity > 86% and a specificity > 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed tool is clinically applicable and helpful for the positioning and analysis of VBs, the measurement of BMD, and the screening of osteopenia and osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>The developed system achieved high accuracy for automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest CT scans and performed well on CT images collected from different scanners.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Osteoporosis is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition that can increase the risk of fractures. This system could automatically and opportunistically screen for osteoporosis using low-dose chest CT scans obtained for lung cancer screening. The developed system performed well on CT images collected from different scanners and did not differ with patient age or sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2287-2295"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence assisted automatic screening of opportunistic osteoporosis in computed tomography images from different scanners.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Wu, Xiaopeng Yang, Mingyue Wang, Yanbang Lian, Ping Hou, Xiangfei Chai, Qiong Dai, Baoxin Qian, Yaojun Jiang, Jianbo Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11046-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is feasible to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and detect osteoporosis through an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system by using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a reference without additional radiation exposure or cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deep-learning model developed based on 3312 low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) scans (trained with 2337 and tested with 975) achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 95.8% for T1-T12, L1, and L2 vertebral body (VB) segmentation on test data. We performed a model evaluation based on 4401 LDCT scans (obtained from scanners of 3 different manufacturers as external validation data). The BMD values of all individuals were extracted from three consecutive VBs: T12 to L2. Line regression and Bland‒Altman analyses were used to evaluate the overall detection performance. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the QCT results as the diagnostic standard, the BMD assessed had a mean error of (- 0.28, 2.37) mg/cm<sup>3</sup>. Overall, the sensitivity of a normal diagnosis was greater than that of a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. For the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the model achieved a sensitivity > 86% and a specificity > 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed tool is clinically applicable and helpful for the positioning and analysis of VBs, the measurement of BMD, and the screening of osteopenia and osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>The developed system achieved high accuracy for automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest CT scans and performed well on CT images collected from different scanners.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Osteoporosis is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition that can increase the risk of fractures. This system could automatically and opportunistically screen for osteoporosis using low-dose chest CT scans obtained for lung cancer screening. The developed system performed well on CT images collected from different scanners and did not differ with patient age or sex.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2287-2295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11046-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11046-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)为参考,通过人工智能(AI)辅助系统评估骨矿密度(BMD)和检测骨质疏松症是可行的,且无需额外的辐射暴露或成本:基于 3312 次低剂量胸部计算机断层扫描(LDCT)扫描(使用 2337 次进行训练,使用 975 次进行测试)开发的深度学习模型在测试数据的 T1-T12、L1 和 L2 椎体(VB)分割方面的平均骰子相似系数达到 95.8%。我们根据 4401 次 LDCT 扫描(作为外部验证数据,来自 3 家不同制造商的扫描仪)对模型进行了评估。所有个体的 BMD 值都是从三个连续的 VB 中提取的:从 T12 到 L2。采用线性回归和 Bland-Altman 分析评估总体检测性能。灵敏度和特异性用于评估正常、骨质疏松和骨质疏松症患者的诊断性能:与作为诊断标准的 QCT 结果相比,所评估的 BMD 平均误差为 (- 0.28, 2.37) mg/cm3。总体而言,正常诊断的灵敏度高于骨质疏松症或骨质疏松症诊断的灵敏度。对于骨质疏松症的诊断,该模型的灵敏度大于 86%,特异性大于 98%:结论:所开发的工具适用于临床,有助于定位和分析 VB、测量 BMD 以及筛查骨质疏松症和骨质疏松症:所开发的系统在使用低剂量胸部 CT 扫描进行自动机会性骨质疏松症筛查方面具有很高的准确性,并在不同扫描仪采集的 CT 图像上表现良好:要点:骨质疏松症是一种普遍存在但诊断不足的疾病,可增加骨折风险。该系统可利用在肺癌筛查中获得的低剂量胸部 CT 扫描,自动并适时筛查骨质疏松症。所开发的系统在不同扫描仪采集的 CT 图像上表现良好,且与患者年龄和性别无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence assisted automatic screening of opportunistic osteoporosis in computed tomography images from different scanners.

Artificial intelligence assisted automatic screening of opportunistic osteoporosis in computed tomography images from different scanners.

Objectives: It is feasible to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and detect osteoporosis through an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system by using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a reference without additional radiation exposure or cost.

Methods: A deep-learning model developed based on 3312 low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) scans (trained with 2337 and tested with 975) achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 95.8% for T1-T12, L1, and L2 vertebral body (VB) segmentation on test data. We performed a model evaluation based on 4401 LDCT scans (obtained from scanners of 3 different manufacturers as external validation data). The BMD values of all individuals were extracted from three consecutive VBs: T12 to L2. Line regression and Bland‒Altman analyses were used to evaluate the overall detection performance. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis patients.

Results: Compared with the QCT results as the diagnostic standard, the BMD assessed had a mean error of (- 0.28, 2.37) mg/cm3. Overall, the sensitivity of a normal diagnosis was greater than that of a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. For the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the model achieved a sensitivity > 86% and a specificity > 98%.

Conclusion: The developed tool is clinically applicable and helpful for the positioning and analysis of VBs, the measurement of BMD, and the screening of osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Clinical relevance statement: The developed system achieved high accuracy for automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest CT scans and performed well on CT images collected from different scanners.

Key points: Osteoporosis is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition that can increase the risk of fractures. This system could automatically and opportunistically screen for osteoporosis using low-dose chest CT scans obtained for lung cancer screening. The developed system performed well on CT images collected from different scanners and did not differ with patient age or sex.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信