具有耳蜗增益传出控制的听觉前向掩蔽皮层下模型

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-09-20 Print Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0365-24.2024
Braden N Maxwell, Afagh Farhadi, Marc A Brennan, Adam Svec, Laurel H Carney
{"title":"具有耳蜗增益传出控制的听觉前向掩蔽皮层下模型","authors":"Braden N Maxwell, Afagh Farhadi, Marc A Brennan, Adam Svec, Laurel H Carney","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0365-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous physiological and psychophysical studies have explored whether feedback to the cochlea from the efferent system influences forward masking. The present work proposes that the limited growth-of-masking (GOM) observed in auditory nerve (AN) fibers may have been misunderstood; namely, that this limitation may be due to the influence of anesthesia on the efferent system. Building on the premise that the unanesthetized AN may exhibit GOM similar to more central nuclei, the present computational modeling study demonstrates that feedback from the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents may contribute to GOM observed physiologically in onset-type neurons in both the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus (IC). Additionally, the computational model of MOC efferents used here generates a decrease in masking with longer masker-signal delays similar to that observed in IC physiology and in psychophysical studies. An advantage of this explanation over alternative physiological explanations (e.g., that forward masking requires inhibition from the superior paraolivary nucleus) is that this theory can explain forward masking observed in the brainstem, early in the ascending pathway. For explaining psychoacoustic results, one strength of this model is that it can account for the lack of elevation in thresholds observed when masker level is randomly varied from interval-to-interval, a result that is difficult to explain using the conventional temporal window model of psychophysical forward masking. Future directions for evaluating the efferent mechanism as a contributing mechanism for psychoacoustic results are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Subcortical Model for Auditory Forward Masking with Efferent Control of Cochlear Gain.\",\"authors\":\"Braden N Maxwell, Afagh Farhadi, Marc A Brennan, Adam Svec, Laurel H Carney\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0365-24.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous physiological and psychophysical studies have explored whether feedback to the cochlea from the efferent system influences forward masking. The present work proposes that the limited growth-of-masking (GOM) observed in auditory nerve (AN) fibers may have been misunderstood; namely, that this limitation may be due to the influence of anesthesia on the efferent system. Building on the premise that the unanesthetized AN may exhibit GOM similar to more central nuclei, the present computational modeling study demonstrates that feedback from the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents may contribute to GOM observed physiologically in onset-type neurons in both the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus (IC). Additionally, the computational model of MOC efferents used here generates a decrease in masking with longer masker-signal delays similar to that observed in IC physiology and in psychophysical studies. An advantage of this explanation over alternative physiological explanations (e.g., that forward masking requires inhibition from the superior paraolivary nucleus) is that this theory can explain forward masking observed in the brainstem, early in the ascending pathway. For explaining psychoacoustic results, one strength of this model is that it can account for the lack of elevation in thresholds observed when masker level is randomly varied from interval-to-interval, a result that is difficult to explain using the conventional temporal window model of psychophysical forward masking. Future directions for evaluating the efferent mechanism as a contributing mechanism for psychoacoustic results are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0365-24.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0365-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的生理和心理物理研究探讨了传出系统对耳蜗的反馈是否会影响前向遮蔽。本研究提出,在听觉神经(AN)纤维中观察到的有限掩蔽增长(GOM)可能被误解了,即这种限制可能是由于麻醉对传出系统的影响。在未麻醉的听觉神经元可能表现出与更多中心核类似的 GOM 的前提下,本计算模型研究证明,来自内侧橄榄耳(MOC)传出的反馈可能有助于在耳蜗核和下丘(IC)的起始型神经元中观察到的生理性 GOM。此外,本文所使用的 MOC 传出因子计算模型会随着掩蔽器-信号延迟时间的延长而降低掩蔽程度,这与 IC 生理和心理物理研究中观察到的情况相似。与其他生理学解释(例如,前向掩蔽需要来自睑上核的抑制)相比,这一解释的优势在于,该理论可以解释在脑干、上升通路早期观察到的前向掩蔽。在解释心理声学结果方面,该模型的一个优点是它可以解释当掩蔽器水平在间隔与间隔之间随机变化时阈值不升高的现象,而这一结果是很难用心理物理前向掩蔽的传统时间窗模型来解释的。本文讨论了评估传出机制作为心理声学结果的促成机制的未来方向。 意义声明 本文的模拟证明,最近建立的听觉皮层下计算模型包括内侧-耳蜗传出,该模型可产生前向掩蔽,即在前一个声音之后,短探头音的检测阈值升高。该模型解释了生理记录的结果,并提出了与心理声学实验的潜在联系。耳蜗增益的传出控制是前向掩蔽的一个促成机制,这一理论解释了耳蜗核神经元表现出的掩蔽强度(生理学理论无法解释,在生理学理论中,前向掩蔽的强度是在上升通路的后期增加的),也解释了掩蔽水平随机变化的心理声学任务的结果(持续的掩蔽能量干扰探头检测的理论无法解释)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Subcortical Model for Auditory Forward Masking with Efferent Control of Cochlear Gain.

Previous physiological and psychophysical studies have explored whether feedback to the cochlea from the efferent system influences forward masking. The present work proposes that the limited growth-of-masking (GOM) observed in auditory nerve (AN) fibers may have been misunderstood; namely, that this limitation may be due to the influence of anesthesia on the efferent system. Building on the premise that the unanesthetized AN may exhibit GOM similar to more central nuclei, the present computational modeling study demonstrates that feedback from the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents may contribute to GOM observed physiologically in onset-type neurons in both the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus (IC). Additionally, the computational model of MOC efferents used here generates a decrease in masking with longer masker-signal delays similar to that observed in IC physiology and in psychophysical studies. An advantage of this explanation over alternative physiological explanations (e.g., that forward masking requires inhibition from the superior paraolivary nucleus) is that this theory can explain forward masking observed in the brainstem, early in the ascending pathway. For explaining psychoacoustic results, one strength of this model is that it can account for the lack of elevation in thresholds observed when masker level is randomly varied from interval-to-interval, a result that is difficult to explain using the conventional temporal window model of psychophysical forward masking. Future directions for evaluating the efferent mechanism as a contributing mechanism for psychoacoustic results are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信