公共医疗服务中的不平等:财政转移支付重要吗?

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
K. S. Harikrishnan, Gourishankar S. Hiremath
{"title":"公共医疗服务中的不平等:财政转移支付重要吗?","authors":"K. S. Harikrishnan,&nbsp;Gourishankar S. Hiremath","doi":"10.1002/pa.2943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we investigate the inequality in the public provision of healthcare in India and assess whether states are converging over time. We locate the equalization of public provision within the framework of fiscal federalism. Departing from previous work, we gauge disparity in public provision by scrutinizing the provision in terms of primary and community health centers. The <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\beta $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>σ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\sigma $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> convergence analysis indicate no substantial reduction in inter-state disparities, raising concerns regarding the attainment of universal healthcare access. In addition, the club convergence analysis identifies states converging into multiple clubs in the public provision of health centers, indicating the persistence of inter-state disparity. The panel regression estimates indicate the prominence of own revenue over fiscal transfers in determining the public provision of healthcare. The findings underscore the necessity of reforms in fiscal devolution, with a particular emphasis on tax devolution and revamping sector-specific grants to achieve national targets. The present paper contributes to a long-standing debate on unconditional versus conditional transfers for public provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pa.2943","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequality in Public Provision of Healthcare: Do Fiscal Transfers Matter?\",\"authors\":\"K. S. Harikrishnan,&nbsp;Gourishankar S. Hiremath\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pa.2943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper, we investigate the inequality in the public provision of healthcare in India and assess whether states are converging over time. We locate the equalization of public provision within the framework of fiscal federalism. Departing from previous work, we gauge disparity in public provision by scrutinizing the provision in terms of primary and community health centers. The <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\beta $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>σ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\sigma $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> convergence analysis indicate no substantial reduction in inter-state disparities, raising concerns regarding the attainment of universal healthcare access. In addition, the club convergence analysis identifies states converging into multiple clubs in the public provision of health centers, indicating the persistence of inter-state disparity. The panel regression estimates indicate the prominence of own revenue over fiscal transfers in determining the public provision of healthcare. The findings underscore the necessity of reforms in fiscal devolution, with a particular emphasis on tax devolution and revamping sector-specific grants to achieve national targets. The present paper contributes to a long-standing debate on unconditional versus conditional transfers for public provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Affairs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pa.2943\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.2943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.2943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们调查了印度在医疗保健公共供给方面的不平等现象,并评估了各邦是否随着时间的推移而趋于一致。我们将公共供给的均等化置于财政联邦制的框架内。与以往的研究不同,我们通过仔细研究初级和社区医疗中心的医疗服务,来衡量公共医疗服务的不平等。β $$ \beta $$ 和 σ $$ \sigma $$ 的收敛分析表明,州际差距没有大幅缩小,这引起了人们对实现全民医疗保健的担忧。此外,俱乐部趋同分析发现,各州在公共医疗中心的提供方面趋同于多个俱乐部,表明州际差距持续存在。面板回归估计表明,在决定医疗保健的公共供给方面,自有收入比财政转移支付更为重要。研究结果强调了改革财政转移支付的必要性,特别强调了税收转移支付和改革特定部门拨款以实现国家目标。本文为长期以来关于无条件转移支付与有条件转移支付的争论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inequality in Public Provision of Healthcare: Do Fiscal Transfers Matter?

Inequality in Public Provision of Healthcare: Do Fiscal Transfers Matter?

In this paper, we investigate the inequality in the public provision of healthcare in India and assess whether states are converging over time. We locate the equalization of public provision within the framework of fiscal federalism. Departing from previous work, we gauge disparity in public provision by scrutinizing the provision in terms of primary and community health centers. The β $$ \beta $$ and σ $$ \sigma $$ convergence analysis indicate no substantial reduction in inter-state disparities, raising concerns regarding the attainment of universal healthcare access. In addition, the club convergence analysis identifies states converging into multiple clubs in the public provision of health centers, indicating the persistence of inter-state disparity. The panel regression estimates indicate the prominence of own revenue over fiscal transfers in determining the public provision of healthcare. The findings underscore the necessity of reforms in fiscal devolution, with a particular emphasis on tax devolution and revamping sector-specific grants to achieve national targets. The present paper contributes to a long-standing debate on unconditional versus conditional transfers for public provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信