Transesophageal ultrasound-guided bronchoscopic Acquire TBNB versus Vizishot2 TBNA needles for neoplastic lesions: A retrospective study

Background

Lung cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage; however, it has shown improved therapeutic efficacy with the introduction of molecularly targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, necessitating accurate molecular diagnosis for effective treatment planning. Traditional sampling techniques, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, frequently require multiple biopsies to obtain sufficient tissues for multiplex testing, highlighting the need for more efficient methods. Therefore, we explored the diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-B-FNB) versus fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) in patients with lung cancer, focusing on tissue sample collection for molecular testing. The introduction of the Franseen needle in EUS-B-FNB, characterized by three beveled edges, allows for more tissue collection in cylinder form.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 97 patients who underwent EUS-B-FNB or EUS-B-FNA at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital and evaluated diagnostic yields, safety, and nucleic acid concentrations using collected specimens.

Results

The diagnostic yields of EUS-B-FNB and EUS-B-FNA were comparable (92.2% vs. 92.3%), with no significant differences in complications. However, EUS-B-FNB provided significantly higher DNA and RNA concentrations (DNA; 41.05 vs. 10.20 ng/mL; P < 0.0001, RNA; 36.80 vs. 11.80 ng/mL; P = 0.0009), essential for comprehensive molecular testing.

Conclusion

This study highlights the potential of EUS-B-FNB for enhancing the molecular diagnosis of lung cancer by ensuring adequate tissue sample collection for multiplex testing, paving the way for personalized medicine. This technique is comparable in safety and efficacy to traditional methods while offering a substantial improvement in the quality of molecular diagnostics.