心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方和转换模式

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
{"title":"心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方和转换模式","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The patterns of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) selection and switching to a different oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe temporal patterns in first DOAC prescriptions, estimate the incidence, and identify predictors of switching to a different OAC within 1 year in OAC-naive AF patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, using a near-nationwide prescription registry (IQVIA, the Netherlands), we determined the number of patients per month initiated on each DOAC and identified predictors of switching within 1 year with robust Poisson regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 94,874 patients. From November 2015 to November 2019, the monthly use of apixaban (<em>n</em> = 366 to <em>n</em> = 1066, +191%), rivaroxaban (<em>n</em> = 379 to <em>n</em> = 868, +129%), and edoxaban (<em>n</em> = 2 to <em>n</em> = 305, +15,150%) increased, whereas that of dabigatran decreased (<em>n</em> = 317 to <em>n</em> = 179, −44%). In the 66,090 patients with ≥1 year of available calendar time, 7% switched to a different OAC within 1 year. Strong predictors of switching to a different DOAC were using dabigatran (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.33; 95% CI, 3.02-3.66) or edoxaban (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82) rather than apixaban and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.23-2.88). Strong predictors of switching to a vitamin K antagonist were using rivaroxaban (aRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.54 vs apixaban) and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the Netherlands, factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being selected for OAC-naive AF patients. Seven percent of patients switch to a different OAC within 1 year, and the initial DOAC type and dose are strong predictors of switching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002395/pdfft?md5=3e676a8fe1eef5cad271dceb451f5210&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924002395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription and switching patterns of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The patterns of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) selection and switching to a different oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe temporal patterns in first DOAC prescriptions, estimate the incidence, and identify predictors of switching to a different OAC within 1 year in OAC-naive AF patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, using a near-nationwide prescription registry (IQVIA, the Netherlands), we determined the number of patients per month initiated on each DOAC and identified predictors of switching within 1 year with robust Poisson regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 94,874 patients. From November 2015 to November 2019, the monthly use of apixaban (<em>n</em> = 366 to <em>n</em> = 1066, +191%), rivaroxaban (<em>n</em> = 379 to <em>n</em> = 868, +129%), and edoxaban (<em>n</em> = 2 to <em>n</em> = 305, +15,150%) increased, whereas that of dabigatran decreased (<em>n</em> = 317 to <em>n</em> = 179, −44%). In the 66,090 patients with ≥1 year of available calendar time, 7% switched to a different OAC within 1 year. Strong predictors of switching to a different DOAC were using dabigatran (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.33; 95% CI, 3.02-3.66) or edoxaban (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82) rather than apixaban and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.23-2.88). Strong predictors of switching to a vitamin K antagonist were using rivaroxaban (aRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.54 vs apixaban) and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the Netherlands, factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being selected for OAC-naive AF patients. Seven percent of patients switch to a different OAC within 1 year, and the initial DOAC type and dose are strong predictors of switching.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002395/pdfft?md5=3e676a8fe1eef5cad271dceb451f5210&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924002395-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心房颤动(房颤)患者选择直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)和改用不同口服抗凝剂(OAC)的模式尚不清楚。目的描述首次开具 DOAC 处方的时间模式,估计发生率,并确定对 OAC 无反应的房颤患者在 1 年内改用不同 OAC 的预测因素。方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们利用近乎全国范围的处方登记处(IQVIA,荷兰),确定了每月开始使用每种 DOAC 的患者人数,并通过稳健泊松回归确定了 1 年内转用其他 OAC 的预测因素。从 2015 年 11 月到 2019 年 11 月,阿哌沙班(n = 366 到 n = 1066,+191%)、利伐沙班(n = 379 到 n = 868,+129%)和埃多沙班(n = 2 到 n = 305,+15,150%)的每月使用量有所增加,而达比加群则有所减少(n = 317 到 n = 179,-44%)。在可用日历时间≥1年的66090名患者中,7%的患者在1年内转用了不同的OAC。使用达比加群(调整风险比 [aRR],3.33;95% CI,3.02-3.66)或依度沙班(aRR,1.56;95% CI,1.34-1.82)而非阿哌沙班,以及使用标准 DOAC 剂量(aRR,2.54;95% CI,2.23-2.88)是转用不同 DOAC 的有力预测因素。使用利伐沙班(aRR,1.36;95% CI,1.19-1.54 vs 阿哌沙班)和使用标准 DOAC 剂量(aRR,1.49;95% CI,1.26-1.77)是转用维生素 K 拮抗剂的有力预测因素。7%的患者在 1 年内转用不同的 OAC,而最初的 DOAC 类型和剂量是预测转用的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prescription and switching patterns of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

Prescription and switching patterns of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

The patterns of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) selection and switching to a different oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown.

Objectives

To describe temporal patterns in first DOAC prescriptions, estimate the incidence, and identify predictors of switching to a different OAC within 1 year in OAC-naive AF patients.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, using a near-nationwide prescription registry (IQVIA, the Netherlands), we determined the number of patients per month initiated on each DOAC and identified predictors of switching within 1 year with robust Poisson regression.

Results

We included 94,874 patients. From November 2015 to November 2019, the monthly use of apixaban (n = 366 to n = 1066, +191%), rivaroxaban (n = 379 to n = 868, +129%), and edoxaban (n = 2 to n = 305, +15,150%) increased, whereas that of dabigatran decreased (n = 317 to n = 179, −44%). In the 66,090 patients with ≥1 year of available calendar time, 7% switched to a different OAC within 1 year. Strong predictors of switching to a different DOAC were using dabigatran (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.33; 95% CI, 3.02-3.66) or edoxaban (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82) rather than apixaban and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.23-2.88). Strong predictors of switching to a vitamin K antagonist were using rivaroxaban (aRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.54 vs apixaban) and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77).

Conclusion

In the Netherlands, factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being selected for OAC-naive AF patients. Seven percent of patients switch to a different OAC within 1 year, and the initial DOAC type and dose are strong predictors of switching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信