{"title":"利用最佳实践降低温室气体和氨排放的草地牛奶生产的经济效益","authors":"Owen Cashman , Imelda Casey , James Humphreys","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Economic sustainability is a primary consideration when contemplating adoption of new farming practices to mitigate climate change. Quantifying the impact of adopting best practices to lower emissions on the profitability of dairy production systems is critical to encouraging rapid adoption at farm level to reach emissions reduction targets.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim was to evaluate the economic consequences of adoption of best practices to mitigate climate change in a typical compact spring-calving grassland-based system of dairy production in Ireland.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected from compact systems-scale experiments conducted at Solohead Research Farm, Co. Tipperary, Ireland (52°51′N, 08°21′W) between 2011 and 2022. There were three systems that had an average of 27 cows per system per year and an average annual stocking rate of 2.53 cows ha<sup>−1</sup>. INT was the control in this study and included average annual fertiliser N input of 265 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, applied as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN 27.5 % N) and urea (46 % N) and the average annual clover content of grassland dry matter was 110 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and slurry was applied by splash plate. BPN included average annual fertiliser N input of 99 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> applied as urea or protected urea, clover content was 230 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and slurry was applied by trailing shoe. BPO received minimal (<5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) inputs of fertiliser N, clover content was 280 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and slurry was applied by trailing shoe. INT encompassed each of 7 experimental years, BPN 7 years and BPO 4 years. Herbage, milk and other production characteristics were measured. Relevant farm activity data was modelled on the basis of a 50 ha farm to compare the economic performance of the three systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>There were no (<em>P</em> > 0.05) differences in herbage dry matter production per ha and milk production per cow between the three systems. BPO was more (<em>P</em> < 0.05) profitable than INT, whereas BPN was intermediate. Sensitivity of the systems to changing fertiliser N and milk price showed that BPO was more profitable (P < 0.05) in scenarios with intermediate or high fertiliser N prices. BPO had the potential to maintain or improve profitability with substantially lower greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions than conventional grassland-based dairy production (INT).</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The adoption of practices to lower greenhouse gas emissions from grassland-based dairy production can maintain or improve farm profitability. These results support wider adoption on farms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104105"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002555/pdfft?md5=d7e3151299ccd2618ba5259cc0914d17&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002555-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic performance of grassland-based milk production using best practices to lower greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions\",\"authors\":\"Owen Cashman , Imelda Casey , James Humphreys\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Economic sustainability is a primary consideration when contemplating adoption of new farming practices to mitigate climate change. Quantifying the impact of adopting best practices to lower emissions on the profitability of dairy production systems is critical to encouraging rapid adoption at farm level to reach emissions reduction targets.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim was to evaluate the economic consequences of adoption of best practices to mitigate climate change in a typical compact spring-calving grassland-based system of dairy production in Ireland.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected from compact systems-scale experiments conducted at Solohead Research Farm, Co. Tipperary, Ireland (52°51′N, 08°21′W) between 2011 and 2022. There were three systems that had an average of 27 cows per system per year and an average annual stocking rate of 2.53 cows ha<sup>−1</sup>. INT was the control in this study and included average annual fertiliser N input of 265 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, applied as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN 27.5 % N) and urea (46 % N) and the average annual clover content of grassland dry matter was 110 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and slurry was applied by splash plate. BPN included average annual fertiliser N input of 99 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> applied as urea or protected urea, clover content was 230 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and slurry was applied by trailing shoe. BPO received minimal (<5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) inputs of fertiliser N, clover content was 280 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and slurry was applied by trailing shoe. INT encompassed each of 7 experimental years, BPN 7 years and BPO 4 years. Herbage, milk and other production characteristics were measured. Relevant farm activity data was modelled on the basis of a 50 ha farm to compare the economic performance of the three systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>There were no (<em>P</em> > 0.05) differences in herbage dry matter production per ha and milk production per cow between the three systems. BPO was more (<em>P</em> < 0.05) profitable than INT, whereas BPN was intermediate. Sensitivity of the systems to changing fertiliser N and milk price showed that BPO was more profitable (P < 0.05) in scenarios with intermediate or high fertiliser N prices. BPO had the potential to maintain or improve profitability with substantially lower greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions than conventional grassland-based dairy production (INT).</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The adoption of practices to lower greenhouse gas emissions from grassland-based dairy production can maintain or improve farm profitability. These results support wider adoption on farms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002555/pdfft?md5=d7e3151299ccd2618ba5259cc0914d17&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002555-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002555\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002555","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The economic performance of grassland-based milk production using best practices to lower greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions
Context
Economic sustainability is a primary consideration when contemplating adoption of new farming practices to mitigate climate change. Quantifying the impact of adopting best practices to lower emissions on the profitability of dairy production systems is critical to encouraging rapid adoption at farm level to reach emissions reduction targets.
Objective
The aim was to evaluate the economic consequences of adoption of best practices to mitigate climate change in a typical compact spring-calving grassland-based system of dairy production in Ireland.
Methods
Data were collected from compact systems-scale experiments conducted at Solohead Research Farm, Co. Tipperary, Ireland (52°51′N, 08°21′W) between 2011 and 2022. There were three systems that had an average of 27 cows per system per year and an average annual stocking rate of 2.53 cows ha−1. INT was the control in this study and included average annual fertiliser N input of 265 kg ha−1, applied as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN 27.5 % N) and urea (46 % N) and the average annual clover content of grassland dry matter was 110 g kg−1, and slurry was applied by splash plate. BPN included average annual fertiliser N input of 99 kg ha−1 applied as urea or protected urea, clover content was 230 g kg−1 and slurry was applied by trailing shoe. BPO received minimal (<5 kg ha−1) inputs of fertiliser N, clover content was 280 g kg−1 and slurry was applied by trailing shoe. INT encompassed each of 7 experimental years, BPN 7 years and BPO 4 years. Herbage, milk and other production characteristics were measured. Relevant farm activity data was modelled on the basis of a 50 ha farm to compare the economic performance of the three systems.
Results and conclusions
There were no (P > 0.05) differences in herbage dry matter production per ha and milk production per cow between the three systems. BPO was more (P < 0.05) profitable than INT, whereas BPN was intermediate. Sensitivity of the systems to changing fertiliser N and milk price showed that BPO was more profitable (P < 0.05) in scenarios with intermediate or high fertiliser N prices. BPO had the potential to maintain or improve profitability with substantially lower greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions than conventional grassland-based dairy production (INT).
Significance
The adoption of practices to lower greenhouse gas emissions from grassland-based dairy production can maintain or improve farm profitability. These results support wider adoption on farms.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.