{"title":"利用 EvoDomain 增强基于逻辑的测试:基于搜索的面向领域测试套件生成方法","authors":"Akram Kalaee, Saeed Parsa, Zahra Mansouri","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Effective software testing requires test adequacy criteria. MC/DC, a widely used logic-based testing criterion, struggles to detect domain errors caused by incorrect arithmetic operations. Domain errors occur when test requirement boundaries shift or tilt, causing unpredictable behavior and system crashes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To address the inadequacy of MC/DC in detecting domain errors, we present EvoDomain, a search-based testing technique.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>EvoDomain uses a memetic algorithm combining genetic and hill-climbing algorithms, along with the DBSCAN clustering algorithm to select diversified boundary test data. The memetic algorithm is designed to efficiently enhance the search process for covering boundary test data. We compared EvoDomain with two logic-based testing approaches, a domain-oriented test suite generation approach, and random testing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Evaluations on 30 case studies show EvoDomain increases fault detection by 74.44% over MC/DC and 65.06% over RoRG. Additionally, EvoDomain improves support for different fault types by up to 68.89% for MC/DC and 66.33% for RoRG. Compared to COSMOS, which uses static analysis, EvoDomain improves the convergence effectiveness of identifying feasible subdomains by 32%. It offers high accuracy (0.99-1) and F1-score (0.99-1). EvoDomain finds the subdomains in less than 1/3 the time of Random search.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EvoDomain effectively generates domain-oriented test suites, enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of fault detection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 107564"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001691/pdfft?md5=07f3cb29ae612025010607deae6b1c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001691-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing logic-based testing with EvoDomain: A search-based domain-oriented test suite generation approach\",\"authors\":\"Akram Kalaee, Saeed Parsa, Zahra Mansouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Effective software testing requires test adequacy criteria. MC/DC, a widely used logic-based testing criterion, struggles to detect domain errors caused by incorrect arithmetic operations. Domain errors occur when test requirement boundaries shift or tilt, causing unpredictable behavior and system crashes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To address the inadequacy of MC/DC in detecting domain errors, we present EvoDomain, a search-based testing technique.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>EvoDomain uses a memetic algorithm combining genetic and hill-climbing algorithms, along with the DBSCAN clustering algorithm to select diversified boundary test data. The memetic algorithm is designed to efficiently enhance the search process for covering boundary test data. We compared EvoDomain with two logic-based testing approaches, a domain-oriented test suite generation approach, and random testing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Evaluations on 30 case studies show EvoDomain increases fault detection by 74.44% over MC/DC and 65.06% over RoRG. Additionally, EvoDomain improves support for different fault types by up to 68.89% for MC/DC and 66.33% for RoRG. Compared to COSMOS, which uses static analysis, EvoDomain improves the convergence effectiveness of identifying feasible subdomains by 32%. It offers high accuracy (0.99-1) and F1-score (0.99-1). EvoDomain finds the subdomains in less than 1/3 the time of Random search.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EvoDomain effectively generates domain-oriented test suites, enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of fault detection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"177 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001691/pdfft?md5=07f3cb29ae612025010607deae6b1c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001691-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001691\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing logic-based testing with EvoDomain: A search-based domain-oriented test suite generation approach
Context
Effective software testing requires test adequacy criteria. MC/DC, a widely used logic-based testing criterion, struggles to detect domain errors caused by incorrect arithmetic operations. Domain errors occur when test requirement boundaries shift or tilt, causing unpredictable behavior and system crashes.
Objective
To address the inadequacy of MC/DC in detecting domain errors, we present EvoDomain, a search-based testing technique.
Method
EvoDomain uses a memetic algorithm combining genetic and hill-climbing algorithms, along with the DBSCAN clustering algorithm to select diversified boundary test data. The memetic algorithm is designed to efficiently enhance the search process for covering boundary test data. We compared EvoDomain with two logic-based testing approaches, a domain-oriented test suite generation approach, and random testing.
Results
Evaluations on 30 case studies show EvoDomain increases fault detection by 74.44% over MC/DC and 65.06% over RoRG. Additionally, EvoDomain improves support for different fault types by up to 68.89% for MC/DC and 66.33% for RoRG. Compared to COSMOS, which uses static analysis, EvoDomain improves the convergence effectiveness of identifying feasible subdomains by 32%. It offers high accuracy (0.99-1) and F1-score (0.99-1). EvoDomain finds the subdomains in less than 1/3 the time of Random search.
Conclusion
EvoDomain effectively generates domain-oriented test suites, enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of fault detection.
期刊介绍:
Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include:
• Software management, quality and metrics,
• Software processes,
• Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming
• Functional and non-functional software requirements
• Software testing and verification & validation
• Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development
Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information.
The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.