揭示结核分枝杆菌利福平药敏试验的复杂性:利用新一代测序技术进行比较分析。

Mehmood Qadir, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Sajjad Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Akram, Julio Ortiz Canseco, Rani Faryal, Dong Qing Wei, Sabira Tahseen
{"title":"揭示结核分枝杆菌利福平药敏试验的复杂性:利用新一代测序技术进行比较分析。","authors":"Mehmood Qadir, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Sajjad Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Akram, Julio Ortiz Canseco, Rani Faryal, Dong Qing Wei, Sabira Tahseen","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> The discordance between phenotypic and molecular methods of rifampicin (RIF) drug susceptibility testing (DST) in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> poses a significant challenge, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.<b>Hypothesis/gap statement.</b> A comparison of RIF phenotypic and molecular methods for DST, including whole genome sequencing (WGS), may provide a better understanding of resistance mechanisms.<b>Aim.</b> This study aims to compare RIF DST in <i>M. tuberculosis</i> using two phenotypic and molecular methods including the GeneXpert RIF Assay (GX) and WGS for better understanding.<b>Methodology.</b> The study evaluated two phenotypic liquid medium methods [Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) and Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)], one targeted molecular method (GX), and one WGS method. Moreover, mutational frequency in <i>ponA1</i> and <i>ponA2</i> was also screened in the current and previous RIF resistance <i>M. tuberculosis</i> genomic isolates to find their compensatory role.<b>Results.</b> A total of 25 RIF-resistant isolates, including nine from treatment failures and relapse cases with both discordant and concordant DST results on LJ, MGIT and GX, were subjected to WGS. The phenotypic DST results indicated that 11 isolates (44%) were susceptible on LJ and MGIT but resistant on GX. These isolates exhibited multiple mutations in <i>rpoB</i>, including Thr444>Ala, Leu430>Pro, Leu430>Arg, Asp435>Gly, His445>Asn and Asn438>Lys. Conversely, four isolates that were susceptible on GX and MGIT but resistant on LJ were wild type for <i>rpoB</i> in WGS. However, these isolates possessed several novel mutations in the PonA1 gene, including a 10 nt insertion and two nonsynonymous mutations (Ala394>Ser, Pro631>Ser), as well as one nonsynonymous mutation (Pro780>Arg) in PonA2. The discordance rate of RIF DST is higher on MGIT than on LJ and GX when compared to WGS. These discordances in the Delhi/CAS lineages were primarily associated with failure and relapse cases.<b>Conclusion.</b> The WGS of RIF resistance is relatively expensive, but it may be considered for isolates with discordant DST results on MGIT, LJ and GX to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the complexity of rifampicin drug susceptibility testing in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>: comparative analysis with next-generation sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmood Qadir, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Sajjad Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Akram, Julio Ortiz Canseco, Rani Faryal, Dong Qing Wei, Sabira Tahseen\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> The discordance between phenotypic and molecular methods of rifampicin (RIF) drug susceptibility testing (DST) in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> poses a significant challenge, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.<b>Hypothesis/gap statement.</b> A comparison of RIF phenotypic and molecular methods for DST, including whole genome sequencing (WGS), may provide a better understanding of resistance mechanisms.<b>Aim.</b> This study aims to compare RIF DST in <i>M. tuberculosis</i> using two phenotypic and molecular methods including the GeneXpert RIF Assay (GX) and WGS for better understanding.<b>Methodology.</b> The study evaluated two phenotypic liquid medium methods [Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) and Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)], one targeted molecular method (GX), and one WGS method. Moreover, mutational frequency in <i>ponA1</i> and <i>ponA2</i> was also screened in the current and previous RIF resistance <i>M. tuberculosis</i> genomic isolates to find their compensatory role.<b>Results.</b> A total of 25 RIF-resistant isolates, including nine from treatment failures and relapse cases with both discordant and concordant DST results on LJ, MGIT and GX, were subjected to WGS. The phenotypic DST results indicated that 11 isolates (44%) were susceptible on LJ and MGIT but resistant on GX. These isolates exhibited multiple mutations in <i>rpoB</i>, including Thr444>Ala, Leu430>Pro, Leu430>Arg, Asp435>Gly, His445>Asn and Asn438>Lys. Conversely, four isolates that were susceptible on GX and MGIT but resistant on LJ were wild type for <i>rpoB</i> in WGS. However, these isolates possessed several novel mutations in the PonA1 gene, including a 10 nt insertion and two nonsynonymous mutations (Ala394>Ser, Pro631>Ser), as well as one nonsynonymous mutation (Pro780>Arg) in PonA2. The discordance rate of RIF DST is higher on MGIT than on LJ and GX when compared to WGS. These discordances in the Delhi/CAS lineages were primarily associated with failure and relapse cases.<b>Conclusion.</b> The WGS of RIF resistance is relatively expensive, but it may be considered for isolates with discordant DST results on MGIT, LJ and GX to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"73 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。结核分枝杆菌对利福平(RIF)药敏试验(DST)的表型方法和分子方法之间的不一致是一项重大挑战,有可能导致误诊和治疗不当。对 RIF 表型和 DST 分子方法(包括全基因组测序(WGS))进行比较,可以更好地了解耐药机制。本研究旨在比较使用两种表型和分子方法(包括 GeneXpert RIF Assay (GX) 和 WGS)对结核杆菌进行的 RIF DST,以便更好地了解其耐药性。该研究评估了两种表型液体培养基方法[Lowenstein-Jensen(LJ)和分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)]、一种靶向分子方法(GX)和一种 WGS 方法。此外,还对当前和以往耐 RIF 结核分枝杆菌基因组中 ponA1 和 ponA2 的突变频率进行了筛查,以发现它们的代偿作用。共对 25 个 RIF 耐药分离株进行了 WGS 检测,其中 9 个来自治疗失败和复发病例,它们在 LJ、MGIT 和 GX 上的 DST 结果既不一致又一致。表型 DST 结果显示,11 个分离株(44%)对 LJ 和 MGIT 易感,但对 GX 耐药。这些分离物的 rpoB 发生了多种突变,包括 Thr444>Ala、Leu430>Pro、Leu430>Arg、Asp435>Gly、His445>Asn 和 Asn438>Lys。相反,4 个对 GX 和 MGIT 易感但对 LJ 耐药的分离株在 WGS 中是 rpoB 野生型。然而,这些分离株的 PonA1 基因有几个新的突变,包括一个 10 nt 插入和两个非同义突变(Ala394>Ser,Pro631>Ser),以及 PonA2 中的一个非同义突变(Pro780>Arg)。与 WGS 相比,MGIT 的 RIF DST 不一致率高于 LJ 和 GX。德里/CAS血统中的这些不一致主要与失败和复发病例有关。对 RIF 耐药性进行 WGS 检测的费用相对较高,但对于 MGIT、LJ 和 GX DST 结果不一致的分离株,可以考虑采用 WGS 检测,以确保准确诊断和适当的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling the complexity of rifampicin drug susceptibility testing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: comparative analysis with next-generation sequencing.

Introduction. The discordance between phenotypic and molecular methods of rifampicin (RIF) drug susceptibility testing (DST) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis poses a significant challenge, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.Hypothesis/gap statement. A comparison of RIF phenotypic and molecular methods for DST, including whole genome sequencing (WGS), may provide a better understanding of resistance mechanisms.Aim. This study aims to compare RIF DST in M. tuberculosis using two phenotypic and molecular methods including the GeneXpert RIF Assay (GX) and WGS for better understanding.Methodology. The study evaluated two phenotypic liquid medium methods [Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) and Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)], one targeted molecular method (GX), and one WGS method. Moreover, mutational frequency in ponA1 and ponA2 was also screened in the current and previous RIF resistance M. tuberculosis genomic isolates to find their compensatory role.Results. A total of 25 RIF-resistant isolates, including nine from treatment failures and relapse cases with both discordant and concordant DST results on LJ, MGIT and GX, were subjected to WGS. The phenotypic DST results indicated that 11 isolates (44%) were susceptible on LJ and MGIT but resistant on GX. These isolates exhibited multiple mutations in rpoB, including Thr444>Ala, Leu430>Pro, Leu430>Arg, Asp435>Gly, His445>Asn and Asn438>Lys. Conversely, four isolates that were susceptible on GX and MGIT but resistant on LJ were wild type for rpoB in WGS. However, these isolates possessed several novel mutations in the PonA1 gene, including a 10 nt insertion and two nonsynonymous mutations (Ala394>Ser, Pro631>Ser), as well as one nonsynonymous mutation (Pro780>Arg) in PonA2. The discordance rate of RIF DST is higher on MGIT than on LJ and GX when compared to WGS. These discordances in the Delhi/CAS lineages were primarily associated with failure and relapse cases.Conclusion. The WGS of RIF resistance is relatively expensive, but it may be considered for isolates with discordant DST results on MGIT, LJ and GX to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信