新型聚四氟乙烯涂层自膨胀金属支架治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的有效性和安全性。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70010
Hiroki Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Takeshi Okamoto, Tatsuki Hirai, Takafumi Mie, Takaaki Furukawa, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Takashi Sasaki, Masato Ozaka, Takahisa Matsuda, Yoshinori Igarashi, Naoki Sasahira
{"title":"新型聚四氟乙烯涂层自膨胀金属支架治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Hiroki Nakagawa,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Takeda,&nbsp;Takeshi Okamoto,&nbsp;Tatsuki Hirai,&nbsp;Takafumi Mie,&nbsp;Takaaki Furukawa,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Kasuga,&nbsp;Takashi Sasaki,&nbsp;Masato Ozaka,&nbsp;Takahisa Matsuda,&nbsp;Yoshinori Igarashi,&nbsp;Naoki Sasahira","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Stent migration and sludge formation remain significant problems associated with covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs). The EGIS biliary stent fully covered flare type (EGIS biliary stent), a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent with low axial force and an anti-migration system, was developed to overcome these disadvantages. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent in comparison with conventional CSEMS (c-CSEMS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received initial CSEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, functional success rate, stent-related adverse events, causes of RBO, and re-intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 40 patients were included (EGIS group: 20; c-CSEMS group: 20). The technical and functional success rates were similar between the two groups. Stent-related adverse event rates (20% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.99) and overall RBO rates (56% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.99) were not significantly different between the two groups. Stent migration was the most common cause of RBO in the EGIS group, while stent occlusion was in the c-CSEMS group. The median time to RBO (102 vs. 434 days, <i>p</i> = 0.10) was not significantly different between the two groups. Endoscopic transpapillary re-intervention was successful in most patients in both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The EGIS biliary stent was not associated with a longer time to RBO compared to c-CSEMS. Further improvements, especially against stent migration, are needed to improve its efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of a novel polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Nakagawa,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Takeda,&nbsp;Takeshi Okamoto,&nbsp;Tatsuki Hirai,&nbsp;Takafumi Mie,&nbsp;Takaaki Furukawa,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Kasuga,&nbsp;Takashi Sasaki,&nbsp;Masato Ozaka,&nbsp;Takahisa Matsuda,&nbsp;Yoshinori Igarashi,&nbsp;Naoki Sasahira\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stent migration and sludge formation remain significant problems associated with covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs). The EGIS biliary stent fully covered flare type (EGIS biliary stent), a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent with low axial force and an anti-migration system, was developed to overcome these disadvantages. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent in comparison with conventional CSEMS (c-CSEMS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received initial CSEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, functional success rate, stent-related adverse events, causes of RBO, and re-intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 40 patients were included (EGIS group: 20; c-CSEMS group: 20). The technical and functional success rates were similar between the two groups. Stent-related adverse event rates (20% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.99) and overall RBO rates (56% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.99) were not significantly different between the two groups. Stent migration was the most common cause of RBO in the EGIS group, while stent occlusion was in the c-CSEMS group. The median time to RBO (102 vs. 434 days, <i>p</i> = 0.10) was not significantly different between the two groups. Endoscopic transpapillary re-intervention was successful in most patients in both groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The EGIS biliary stent was not associated with a longer time to RBO compared to c-CSEMS. Further improvements, especially against stent migration, are needed to improve its efficacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支架移位和淤泥形成仍是有盖自扩张金属支架(CSEMS)的主要问题。EGIS 胆道支架全覆盖扩口型(EGIS 胆道支架)是一种新型聚四氟乙烯涂层自膨胀金属支架,具有低轴向力和防移位系统,其开发就是为了克服这些缺点。我们进行了这项研究,以评估这种支架与传统 CSEMS(c-CSEMS)相比的有效性和安全性:我们对连续接受 CSEMS 治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的不可切除胰腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。主要结果是复发性胆道梗阻(RBO)发生的时间。次要结果包括技术成功率、功能成功率、支架相关不良事件、导致 RBO 的原因以及再次介入:共纳入40例患者(EGIS组:20例;c-CSEMS组:20例)。两组的技术和功能成功率相似。支架相关不良事件发生率(20% 对 15%,P > 0.99)和总体 RBO 发生率(56% 对 50%,P > 0.99)在两组间无显著差异。在EGIS组,支架移位是导致RBO的最常见原因,而在c-CSEMS组,支架闭塞是导致RBO的最常见原因。两组患者发生 RBO 的中位时间(102 天 vs. 434 天,p = 0.10)无明显差异。两组的大多数患者都成功进行了内镜下经肾盂再介入治疗:结论:与 c-CSEMS 相比,EGIS 胆道支架不会延长 RBO 的时间。要提高其疗效,还需要进一步改进,尤其是在防止支架移位方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of a novel polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction

Efficacy and safety of a novel polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction

Background

Stent migration and sludge formation remain significant problems associated with covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs). The EGIS biliary stent fully covered flare type (EGIS biliary stent), a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent with low axial force and an anti-migration system, was developed to overcome these disadvantages. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent in comparison with conventional CSEMS (c-CSEMS).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received initial CSEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, functional success rate, stent-related adverse events, causes of RBO, and re-intervention.

Results

A total of 40 patients were included (EGIS group: 20; c-CSEMS group: 20). The technical and functional success rates were similar between the two groups. Stent-related adverse event rates (20% vs. 15%, p > 0.99) and overall RBO rates (56% vs. 50%, p > 0.99) were not significantly different between the two groups. Stent migration was the most common cause of RBO in the EGIS group, while stent occlusion was in the c-CSEMS group. The median time to RBO (102 vs. 434 days, p = 0.10) was not significantly different between the two groups. Endoscopic transpapillary re-intervention was successful in most patients in both groups.

Conclusions

The EGIS biliary stent was not associated with a longer time to RBO compared to c-CSEMS. Further improvements, especially against stent migration, are needed to improve its efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信