选择性获取决策支持是事件不确定性的函数。

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Yoav Ben Yaakov, Jason S McCarley, Joachim Meyer
{"title":"选择性获取决策支持是事件不确定性的函数。","authors":"Yoav Ben Yaakov, Jason S McCarley, Joachim Meyer","doi":"10.1177/00187208241277158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigate the impact of event uncertainty, decision support (DS) display format, and DS sensitivity on participants' behavior, performance, subjective workload, and perception of DS usefulness and performance in a classification task.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>DS systems can positively and negatively affect decision accuracy, performance time, and workload. The ability to access DS selectively, based on informational needs, might improve DS effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants performed a sensory classification task in which they were allowed to request DS on a trial-by-trial basis. DS was presented in separated-binary (SB), separated-likelihood (SL), or integrated-likelihood (IL) formats. Access preferences, task performance, performance time, subjective workload, and perceived DS usefulness and performance were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants accessed DS more often when it was highly sensitive, stimulus information was highly uncertain, or the DS cue and stimulus information were perceptually integrated. Effective sensitivity was highest with the integrated likelihood DS. Although the separated likelihood DS provided more information than the binary likelihood DS, it was accessed less often, leading to lower sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants are most likely to access DS when raw stimulus information is highly uncertain and appear to make effective use of likelihood DS only when DS cues are integrated with raw stimulus information within a display.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Results suggest that DS use will be most effective when likelihood DS cues and raw stimulus information are perceptually integrated. When DS cues and raw stimuli cannot be perceptually integrated, binary cues from the DS will be more effective than likelihood cues.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective Access to Decision Support as a Function of Event Uncertainty.\",\"authors\":\"Yoav Ben Yaakov, Jason S McCarley, Joachim Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187208241277158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigate the impact of event uncertainty, decision support (DS) display format, and DS sensitivity on participants' behavior, performance, subjective workload, and perception of DS usefulness and performance in a classification task.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>DS systems can positively and negatively affect decision accuracy, performance time, and workload. The ability to access DS selectively, based on informational needs, might improve DS effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants performed a sensory classification task in which they were allowed to request DS on a trial-by-trial basis. DS was presented in separated-binary (SB), separated-likelihood (SL), or integrated-likelihood (IL) formats. Access preferences, task performance, performance time, subjective workload, and perceived DS usefulness and performance were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants accessed DS more often when it was highly sensitive, stimulus information was highly uncertain, or the DS cue and stimulus information were perceptually integrated. Effective sensitivity was highest with the integrated likelihood DS. Although the separated likelihood DS provided more information than the binary likelihood DS, it was accessed less often, leading to lower sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants are most likely to access DS when raw stimulus information is highly uncertain and appear to make effective use of likelihood DS only when DS cues are integrated with raw stimulus information within a display.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Results suggest that DS use will be most effective when likelihood DS cues and raw stimulus information are perceptually integrated. When DS cues and raw stimuli cannot be perceptually integrated, binary cues from the DS will be more effective than likelihood cues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208241277158\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208241277158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了事件的不确定性、决策支持(DS)显示格式和 DS 敏感性对参与者在分类任务中的行为、表现、主观工作量以及 DS 有用性和表现感知的影响:我们研究了事件不确定性、决策支持(DS)显示格式和DS敏感度对参与者在分类任务中的行为、表现、主观工作量以及对DS有用性和表现的感知的影响:背景:决策支持系统会对决策准确性、执行时间和工作量产生积极或消极影响。根据信息需求有选择性地访问 DS 的能力可能会提高 DS 的有效性:方法:受试者进行一项感官分类任务,在这项任务中,受试者可以在逐次试验的基础上请求 DS。DS 以分离二进制 (SB)、分离似然 (SL) 或综合似然 (IL) 格式呈现。访问偏好、任务执行情况、执行时间、主观工作量以及感知到的 DS 有用性和性能均被记录在案:结果:当 DS 具有高度敏感性、刺激信息具有高度不确定性或 DS 提示和刺激信息在知觉上是综合的时,参与者更频繁地访问 DS。综合可能性 DS 的有效灵敏度最高。虽然分离可能性 DS 比二元可能性 DS 提供了更多的信息,但它的使用频率较低,导致敏感度较低:结论:当原始刺激信息高度不确定时,受试者最有可能使用可能性偏差,而只有当可能性偏差线索与原始刺激信息整合在一起时,受试者才会有效地使用可能性偏差:应用:研究结果表明,当可能的DS线索和原始刺激信息在知觉上结合在一起时,DS的使用将最为有效。当 DS 提示和原始刺激信息无法在知觉上整合时,来自 DS 的二进制提示将比可能性提示更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective Access to Decision Support as a Function of Event Uncertainty.

Objective: We investigate the impact of event uncertainty, decision support (DS) display format, and DS sensitivity on participants' behavior, performance, subjective workload, and perception of DS usefulness and performance in a classification task.

Background: DS systems can positively and negatively affect decision accuracy, performance time, and workload. The ability to access DS selectively, based on informational needs, might improve DS effectiveness.

Method: Participants performed a sensory classification task in which they were allowed to request DS on a trial-by-trial basis. DS was presented in separated-binary (SB), separated-likelihood (SL), or integrated-likelihood (IL) formats. Access preferences, task performance, performance time, subjective workload, and perceived DS usefulness and performance were recorded.

Results: Participants accessed DS more often when it was highly sensitive, stimulus information was highly uncertain, or the DS cue and stimulus information were perceptually integrated. Effective sensitivity was highest with the integrated likelihood DS. Although the separated likelihood DS provided more information than the binary likelihood DS, it was accessed less often, leading to lower sensitivity.

Conclusion: Participants are most likely to access DS when raw stimulus information is highly uncertain and appear to make effective use of likelihood DS only when DS cues are integrated with raw stimulus information within a display.

Application: Results suggest that DS use will be most effective when likelihood DS cues and raw stimulus information are perceptually integrated. When DS cues and raw stimuli cannot be perceptually integrated, binary cues from the DS will be more effective than likelihood cues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信