内镜联合肾内手术:最佳实践与未来展望。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anderson B Pellanda, Fabio C M Torricelli, John Denstedt, Alexandre Danilovic, Giovanni S Marchini, Fabio C Vicentini, Carlos A Batagello, William C Nahas, Eduardo Mazzucchi
{"title":"内镜联合肾内手术:最佳实践与未来展望。","authors":"Anderson B Pellanda, Fabio C M Torricelli, John Denstedt, Alexandre Danilovic, Giovanni S Marchini, Fabio C Vicentini, Carlos A Batagello, William C Nahas, Eduardo Mazzucchi","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) has emerged as a promising technique for the management of large and complex kidney stones, potentially offering advantages over traditional Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to evaluate best practices, outcomes, and future perspectives associated with ECIRS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted from 2008 to 2024, using MESH terms and the following key words: \"ECIRS\" and \"Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery\" The search yielded 157 articles, including retrospective cohort studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and four meta-analyses comparing ECIRS with PCNL. Most important findings were summarized regarding indications, patient positioning, kidney access, tract size, surgical outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECIRS demonstrated higher stone-free rate, lower complication rate, and a reduced need for multiple procedures compared to traditional PCNL. Additionally, ECIRS has the potential to integrate new technologies to further enhance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECIRS demonstrates significant advantages in the management of large kidney stones. Future research should focus on well-designed RCTs to provide robust evidence of its efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, potentially establishing ECIRS as the first option treatment for complex kidney stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"50 6","pages":"714-726"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery: best practices and future perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Anderson B Pellanda, Fabio C M Torricelli, John Denstedt, Alexandre Danilovic, Giovanni S Marchini, Fabio C Vicentini, Carlos A Batagello, William C Nahas, Eduardo Mazzucchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) has emerged as a promising technique for the management of large and complex kidney stones, potentially offering advantages over traditional Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to evaluate best practices, outcomes, and future perspectives associated with ECIRS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted from 2008 to 2024, using MESH terms and the following key words: \\\"ECIRS\\\" and \\\"Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery\\\" The search yielded 157 articles, including retrospective cohort studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and four meta-analyses comparing ECIRS with PCNL. Most important findings were summarized regarding indications, patient positioning, kidney access, tract size, surgical outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECIRS demonstrated higher stone-free rate, lower complication rate, and a reduced need for multiple procedures compared to traditional PCNL. Additionally, ECIRS has the potential to integrate new technologies to further enhance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECIRS demonstrates significant advantages in the management of large kidney stones. Future research should focus on well-designed RCTs to provide robust evidence of its efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, potentially establishing ECIRS as the first option treatment for complex kidney stones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Braz J Urol\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"714-726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Braz J Urol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9921\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)已成为一种治疗大型复杂肾结石的有前途的技术,与传统的经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)相比具有潜在优势。本研究旨在评估与 ECIRS 相关的最佳实践、结果和未来前景:从 2008 年到 2024 年,使用 MESH 术语和以下关键词对 PubMed 进行了全面搜索:"搜索共获得 157 篇文章,包括回顾性队列研究、两项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和四项比较 ECIRS 与 PCNL 的荟萃分析。对最重要的研究结果进行了总结,包括适应症、患者定位、肾脏通路、肾道大小、手术效果和并发症:结果:与传统 PCNL 相比,ECIRS 的无结石率更高,并发症发生率更低,而且减少了多次手术的需要。此外,ECIRS 还具有整合新技术以进一步提高疗效的潜力:结论:ECIRS 在治疗大块肾结石方面具有显著优势。未来的研究应侧重于设计良好的 RCT,为其疗效、安全性和成本效益提供有力的证据,从而将 ECIRS 确立为复杂肾结石的首选治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery: best practices and future perspectives.

Introduction: Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) has emerged as a promising technique for the management of large and complex kidney stones, potentially offering advantages over traditional Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to evaluate best practices, outcomes, and future perspectives associated with ECIRS.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted from 2008 to 2024, using MESH terms and the following key words: "ECIRS" and "Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery" The search yielded 157 articles, including retrospective cohort studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and four meta-analyses comparing ECIRS with PCNL. Most important findings were summarized regarding indications, patient positioning, kidney access, tract size, surgical outcomes, and complications.

Results: ECIRS demonstrated higher stone-free rate, lower complication rate, and a reduced need for multiple procedures compared to traditional PCNL. Additionally, ECIRS has the potential to integrate new technologies to further enhance outcomes.

Conclusion: ECIRS demonstrates significant advantages in the management of large kidney stones. Future research should focus on well-designed RCTs to provide robust evidence of its efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, potentially establishing ECIRS as the first option treatment for complex kidney stones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信