非常瘦弱的患者在接受经皮肾镜碎石术时发生并发症的风险是否更高?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Priscila Kuriki Vieira Mota, Daniel Beltrame Ferreira, Rafael Felisberto Dias Florencio, David Jacques Cohen, Rodrigo Perrella, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Fabio C Vicentini
{"title":"非常瘦弱的患者在接受经皮肾镜碎石术时发生并发症的风险是否更高?","authors":"Priscila Kuriki Vieira Mota, Daniel Beltrame Ferreira, Rafael Felisberto Dias Florencio, David Jacques Cohen, Rodrigo Perrella, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Fabio C Vicentini","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of thinness on the outcome of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A matched case-control study was performed using a prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent PCNL between June 2011 and October 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their phenotypic characteristics, arbitrarily defined according to their body mass index (BMI): <0kg/m2 (Group 1, very thin patients, G<20) and ≥25 kg/m2 (Group 2, non-thin patients, G≥25). Patients were randomly matched based on Guy's Stone Score (GSS) according to case complexity at a ratio of 1:3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this study: 51 patients (G<20) and 153 controls (G≥25). Complications occurred in 15.2% of the patients, with 5.4% of these complications classified as major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3). According to complications there were no significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rates were 17.6% in the G<20 and 14.4% in the G≥25 (p = 0.653). The major complication rates were 3.9% in the G<20 and 5.8% in the G≥25 (p=0.429). No differences in transfusion or urinary fistula rates were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, very thin patients were not at a higher risk of complications when submitted to PCNL than in those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Apparently, this technique can be used in these patients, just as it is used in any other type of patient, independently of their BMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"50 6","pages":"746-753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are very thin patients at a higher risk of complications when submitted to percutane-ous nephrolithotomy?\",\"authors\":\"Priscila Kuriki Vieira Mota, Daniel Beltrame Ferreira, Rafael Felisberto Dias Florencio, David Jacques Cohen, Rodrigo Perrella, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Fabio C Vicentini\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of thinness on the outcome of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A matched case-control study was performed using a prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent PCNL between June 2011 and October 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their phenotypic characteristics, arbitrarily defined according to their body mass index (BMI): <0kg/m2 (Group 1, very thin patients, G<20) and ≥25 kg/m2 (Group 2, non-thin patients, G≥25). Patients were randomly matched based on Guy's Stone Score (GSS) according to case complexity at a ratio of 1:3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this study: 51 patients (G<20) and 153 controls (G≥25). Complications occurred in 15.2% of the patients, with 5.4% of these complications classified as major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3). According to complications there were no significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rates were 17.6% in the G<20 and 14.4% in the G≥25 (p = 0.653). The major complication rates were 3.9% in the G<20 and 5.8% in the G≥25 (p=0.429). No differences in transfusion or urinary fistula rates were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, very thin patients were not at a higher risk of complications when submitted to PCNL than in those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Apparently, this technique can be used in these patients, just as it is used in any other type of patient, independently of their BMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Braz J Urol\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"746-753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554281/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Braz J Urol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估消瘦对经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)结果的影响:利用前瞻性收集的数据库,对 2011 年 6 月至 2021 年 10 月间接受 PCNL 的所有患者进行了匹配病例对照研究。根据表型特征将患者分为两组,并根据体重指数(BMI)进行任意定义:结果:共有 204 名患者参与了这项研究:51名患者(G结论:在这项研究中,与体重指数≥25 kg/m2 的患者相比,非常瘦的患者在接受 PCNL 时并没有更高的并发症风险。显然,这种技术可以用于这些病人,就像用于其他类型的病人一样,与他们的体重指数无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are very thin patients at a higher risk of complications when submitted to percutane-ous nephrolithotomy?

Purpose: To assess the impact of thinness on the outcome of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and methods: A matched case-control study was performed using a prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent PCNL between June 2011 and October 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to their phenotypic characteristics, arbitrarily defined according to their body mass index (BMI): <0kg/m2 (Group 1, very thin patients, G<20) and ≥25 kg/m2 (Group 2, non-thin patients, G≥25). Patients were randomly matched based on Guy's Stone Score (GSS) according to case complexity at a ratio of 1:3.

Results: A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this study: 51 patients (G<20) and 153 controls (G≥25). Complications occurred in 15.2% of the patients, with 5.4% of these complications classified as major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3). According to complications there were no significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rates were 17.6% in the G<20 and 14.4% in the G≥25 (p = 0.653). The major complication rates were 3.9% in the G<20 and 5.8% in the G≥25 (p=0.429). No differences in transfusion or urinary fistula rates were found.

Conclusions: In this study, very thin patients were not at a higher risk of complications when submitted to PCNL than in those with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Apparently, this technique can be used in these patients, just as it is used in any other type of patient, independently of their BMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信