新生儿重症监护中依赖性分类工具:一致性和可靠性分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.6922.4272
Paula Mara Bordim Lopes, Fernanda Broering Gomes Torres, Thomaz Jefferson Massaneiro, Adriano Akira Hino, Elenice Valentim Carmona, Marcia Regina Cubas
{"title":"新生儿重症监护中依赖性分类工具:一致性和可靠性分析。","authors":"Paula Mara Bordim Lopes, Fernanda Broering Gomes Torres, Thomaz Jefferson Massaneiro, Adriano Akira Hino, Elenice Valentim Carmona, Marcia Regina Cubas","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.6922.4272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to analyze the reliability of the items that compose the instrument for classifying newborns according to the degree of dependence on nursing care in a neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>methodological study that analyzed the agreement and reliability of the instrument in a neonatal intensive care unit. Six care nurses and a research nurse assessed 35 newborns and completed the instrument, which was made up of 15 areas of care. The weighted Kappa coefficient and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the areas of: weight (92%), oxygenation (93%) and catheter control (95%) had almost perfect agreement and the area of reaction to stimuli (50%) had poor agreement. The areas of elimination and vital signs showed low reliability, due to the low variability of responses. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>there are variations in the evaluations of some areas of care due to the imprecise description of items to which scores are assigned, however the instrument is reliable for categorizing the type of care (minimal, intermediate and intensive). Its use can contribute to measuring the quality and safety of newborn care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":"32 ","pages":"e4272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instrument for classifying dependency in neonatal intensive care: analysis of agreement and reliability.\",\"authors\":\"Paula Mara Bordim Lopes, Fernanda Broering Gomes Torres, Thomaz Jefferson Massaneiro, Adriano Akira Hino, Elenice Valentim Carmona, Marcia Regina Cubas\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1518-8345.6922.4272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to analyze the reliability of the items that compose the instrument for classifying newborns according to the degree of dependence on nursing care in a neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>methodological study that analyzed the agreement and reliability of the instrument in a neonatal intensive care unit. Six care nurses and a research nurse assessed 35 newborns and completed the instrument, which was made up of 15 areas of care. The weighted Kappa coefficient and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the areas of: weight (92%), oxygenation (93%) and catheter control (95%) had almost perfect agreement and the area of reaction to stimuli (50%) had poor agreement. The areas of elimination and vital signs showed low reliability, due to the low variability of responses. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>there are variations in the evaluations of some areas of care due to the imprecise description of items to which scores are assigned, however the instrument is reliable for categorizing the type of care (minimal, intermediate and intensive). Its use can contribute to measuring the quality and safety of newborn care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"e4272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6922.4272\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6922.4272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析根据新生儿重症监护室护理依赖程度对新生儿进行分类的工具项目的可靠性。方法:在新生儿重症监护室进行方法学研究,分析工具的一致性和可靠性。六名护理护士和一名研究护士对 35 名新生儿进行了评估,并填写了由 15 个护理领域组成的工具。结果显示:体重(92%)、氧合作用(93%)和导管控制(95%)几乎完全一致,而对刺激的反应(50%)则不太一致。消除和生命体征方面由于反应的可变性较低,因此可靠性较低。结论:由于对评分项目的描述不精确,对某些护理领域的评价存在差异,但该工具对护理类型(最低、中级和强化)的分类是可靠的。使用该工具有助于衡量新生儿护理的质量和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instrument for classifying dependency in neonatal intensive care: analysis of agreement and reliability.

Objective: to analyze the reliability of the items that compose the instrument for classifying newborns according to the degree of dependence on nursing care in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Method: methodological study that analyzed the agreement and reliability of the instrument in a neonatal intensive care unit. Six care nurses and a research nurse assessed 35 newborns and completed the instrument, which was made up of 15 areas of care. The weighted Kappa coefficient and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient were used for analysis.

Results: the areas of: weight (92%), oxygenation (93%) and catheter control (95%) had almost perfect agreement and the area of reaction to stimuli (50%) had poor agreement. The areas of elimination and vital signs showed low reliability, due to the low variability of responses. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.94.

Conclusion: there are variations in the evaluations of some areas of care due to the imprecise description of items to which scores are assigned, however the instrument is reliable for categorizing the type of care (minimal, intermediate and intensive). Its use can contribute to measuring the quality and safety of newborn care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信