不符合一线临床试验条件的转移性肾细胞癌 (mRCC) 患者的临床结果。

IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352
Nathan Reynolds, Wei Wei, Kimberly Maroli, Amanda Bonham, Amanda Nizam, Timothy D Gilligan, Christopher Wee, Shilpa Gupta, Moshe C Ornstein
{"title":"不符合一线临床试验条件的转移性肾细胞癌 (mRCC) 患者的临床结果。","authors":"Nathan Reynolds, Wei Wei, Kimberly Maroli, Amanda Bonham, Amanda Nizam, Timothy D Gilligan, Christopher Wee, Shilpa Gupta, Moshe C Ornstein","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Reynolds, Wei Wei, Kimberly Maroli, Amanda Bonham, Amanda Nizam, Timothy D Gilligan, Christopher Wee, Shilpa Gupta, Moshe C Ornstein\",\"doi\":\"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以免疫疗法为基础的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)临床试验有广泛的纳入和排除标准。我们调查了一组现实世界中不符合mRCC一线试验纳入标准的患者的临床疗效。我们确定了接受ipilimumab/nivolumab和axitinib/pembrolizumab治疗的一线mRCC患者,并根据其各自的3期注册试验的主要纳入或排除标准将其分为符合临床试验条件(CTE)和不符合临床试验条件(CTI)队列。比较了 CTE 和 CTI 组群的临床结果。共确定了62名接受阿西替尼/pembrolizumab治疗的患者和103名接受伊匹单抗/nivolumab治疗的患者。阿西替尼/pembrolizumab和伊匹单抗/nivolumab队列中的CTE和CTI患者采用的国际转移性RCC数据库联盟(IMDC)标准相似。在阿西替尼/pembrolizumab队列(n = 62)中,有24名(39%)患者为CTI。不符合条件的主要原因是实验室异常(11 例)、组织学异常(9 例)和脑转移(3 例)。反应率无明显差异(P = 0.08)。从数字上看,CTE 患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)更长(28 个月对 12 个月;P = 0.09)。CTE患者的总生存期(OS)更长(P = 0.02)。在ipilimumab/nivolumab队列(n = 103)中,59人(57%)为CTI。不符合条件的最常见原因是脑转移(n = 18)、实验室异常(n = 16)和组织学(n = 16)。反应率无明显差异(P = 0.22)。然而,CTE 患者的 PFS(P = 0.003)和 OS(P < 0.0001)更高。总之,现实世界中有许多患者不符合 RCC 临床试验的条件,与符合试验条件的患者相比,他们的预后更差。需要为这些患者提供更多的治疗方案,并制定策略将他们纳入前瞻性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信