波动拱对称性:两种评估方法的比较--适用性和效率。

Q2 Medicine
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2423265.oar
Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli, Eloá Cristina Passucci Ambrosio, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Márcio de Menezes, Simone Soares
{"title":"波动拱对称性:两种评估方法的比较--适用性和效率。","authors":"Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli, Eloá Cristina Passucci Ambrosio, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Márcio de Menezes, Simone Soares","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2423265.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Symmetry is balance, some correspondence in the size, form, and arrangements of parts on opposite sides of a plane, line, or point. The opposite of this concept is asymmetry, or imbalance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study compared two methods for assessing arch symmetry with linear measurements based on triangles, to determine their applicability and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were enrolled: children (n=20) and adults (n=20), and the arch symmetry was assessed from linear measurements. Method 1: the incisor-canine (INC), canine-molar (CM), and incisor-molar (INM) distances (paired t-test and Pearson correlation). Method 2: a mathematical equation between the cusps measurements of the canines and the distobuccal of the first molars leading to result 1 (t-test for one sample and bootstrapping analysis). Dental casts were digitized and analyzed using a software program. The Bland-Altman test compared the methods (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman test revealed concordance between the methods; however, separately the results were different: In method 1, the mandibular arch did not demonstrate correlation (children, INC r=0.33; CM r=0.45; INM r=0.51; adults, CM r=0.46; INM r=0.35), however, the maxilla revealed a strong correlation in children and a strong/moderate correlation in adults. In method 2, both arches were symmetrical (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Method 1 may be appropriate during orthodontic treatment, and method 2 may be indicated for final treatment. These methods are useful; however, only method 1 identified the side of asymmetry. The methods can contribute to future studies in syndromic and non-syndromic patients, before and after orthognathic surgeries and orthodontic treatment, comparing results.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"29 4","pages":"e2423265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluctuating arch symmetry: a comparison of two methods of assessment - applicability and efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli, Eloá Cristina Passucci Ambrosio, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Márcio de Menezes, Simone Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2423265.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Symmetry is balance, some correspondence in the size, form, and arrangements of parts on opposite sides of a plane, line, or point. The opposite of this concept is asymmetry, or imbalance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study compared two methods for assessing arch symmetry with linear measurements based on triangles, to determine their applicability and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were enrolled: children (n=20) and adults (n=20), and the arch symmetry was assessed from linear measurements. Method 1: the incisor-canine (INC), canine-molar (CM), and incisor-molar (INM) distances (paired t-test and Pearson correlation). Method 2: a mathematical equation between the cusps measurements of the canines and the distobuccal of the first molars leading to result 1 (t-test for one sample and bootstrapping analysis). Dental casts were digitized and analyzed using a software program. The Bland-Altman test compared the methods (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman test revealed concordance between the methods; however, separately the results were different: In method 1, the mandibular arch did not demonstrate correlation (children, INC r=0.33; CM r=0.45; INM r=0.51; adults, CM r=0.46; INM r=0.35), however, the maxilla revealed a strong correlation in children and a strong/moderate correlation in adults. In method 2, both arches were symmetrical (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Method 1 may be appropriate during orthodontic treatment, and method 2 may be indicated for final treatment. These methods are useful; however, only method 1 identified the side of asymmetry. The methods can contribute to future studies in syndromic and non-syndromic patients, before and after orthognathic surgeries and orthodontic treatment, comparing results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"e2423265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2423265.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2423265.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:对称是指平衡,是指平面、直线或点的相对两边各部分的大小、形状和排列的某种对应关系。与这一概念相反的是不对称或不平衡:这项回顾性研究比较了用基于三角形的线性测量来评估牙弓对称性的两种方法,以确定它们的适用性和效率:方法:分为儿童(20 人)和成人(20 人)两组,通过线性测量评估牙弓对称性。方法 1:门齿-犬齿(INC)、犬齿-臼齿(CM)和门齿-臼齿(INM)的距离(配对 t 检验和皮尔逊相关性)。方法 2:在犬齿的尖牙测量值和第一臼齿的远颊面之间建立数学等式,得出结果 1(单样本 t 检验和引导分析)。使用软件程序对牙齿铸模进行数字化和分析。布兰-阿尔特曼检验比较了两种方法(α=0.05):布兰-阿尔特曼检验显示,两种方法之间具有一致性;但是,不同方法的结果却不同:在方法 1 中,下颌牙弓没有显示出相关性(儿童,INC r=0.33;CM r=0.45;INM r=0.51;成人,CM r=0.46;INM r=0.35),但是,儿童的上颌显示出强相关性,成人的上颌显示出强/中度相关性。在方法 2 中,两个牙弓是对称的(P>0.05):结论:方法 1 可能适用于正畸治疗,方法 2 可能适用于最终治疗。这些方法都很有用,但只有方法 1 能确定不对称的一侧。这些方法有助于今后对综合征和非综合征患者、正颌手术和正畸治疗前后的结果进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluctuating arch symmetry: a comparison of two methods of assessment - applicability and efficiency.

Introduction: Symmetry is balance, some correspondence in the size, form, and arrangements of parts on opposite sides of a plane, line, or point. The opposite of this concept is asymmetry, or imbalance.

Objective: This retrospective study compared two methods for assessing arch symmetry with linear measurements based on triangles, to determine their applicability and efficiency.

Methods: Two groups were enrolled: children (n=20) and adults (n=20), and the arch symmetry was assessed from linear measurements. Method 1: the incisor-canine (INC), canine-molar (CM), and incisor-molar (INM) distances (paired t-test and Pearson correlation). Method 2: a mathematical equation between the cusps measurements of the canines and the distobuccal of the first molars leading to result 1 (t-test for one sample and bootstrapping analysis). Dental casts were digitized and analyzed using a software program. The Bland-Altman test compared the methods (α=0.05).

Results: The Bland-Altman test revealed concordance between the methods; however, separately the results were different: In method 1, the mandibular arch did not demonstrate correlation (children, INC r=0.33; CM r=0.45; INM r=0.51; adults, CM r=0.46; INM r=0.35), however, the maxilla revealed a strong correlation in children and a strong/moderate correlation in adults. In method 2, both arches were symmetrical (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Method 1 may be appropriate during orthodontic treatment, and method 2 may be indicated for final treatment. These methods are useful; however, only method 1 identified the side of asymmetry. The methods can contribute to future studies in syndromic and non-syndromic patients, before and after orthognathic surgeries and orthodontic treatment, comparing results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信