Denalee M O'Malley, Sarah Alavi, Jennifer Tsui, Cilgy M Abraham, Pamela Ohman-Strickland
{"title":"与非癌症对照组相比,全国癌症幸存者样本中糖尿病护理质量的种族和民族差异。","authors":"Denalee M O'Malley, Sarah Alavi, Jennifer Tsui, Cilgy M Abraham, Pamela Ohman-Strickland","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02156-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among cancer survivors, diabetes is associated with greater morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to describe racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes care quality (DCQ) among cancer survivors compared to non-cancer controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component data (2010-2018). Black, non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic respondents diagnosed with diabetes and cancer were frequency matched 1:5 to non-cancer controls. Multivariable logistic regression estimated associations for specific indices and overall DCQ by race/ethnicity stratified by cancer site/status in partially adjusted (not controlling for socioeconomic indicators) and fully adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample of 4775 included cancer survivors (n = 907 all cancers; n = 401 breast; n = 167 colon; n = 339 prostate) and non-cancer controls (n = 3868) matched by age, race/ethnicity, and year. In partially adjusted models, Black (adjusted odds ratio, AOR) 0.67 [95% CI 0.54-0.83]) and Hispanic (AOR 0.68 [95% CI 0.54-0.87]) non-cancer controls had significant disparities for overall DCQ compared to NHWs. Among cancer survivors, DCQ disparities for Black (AOR 0.62, [95% CI 0.4-0.96]) and Hispanics (AOR 0.60, [95% CI 0.38-0.97]) were identified. Among prostate cancer survivors, DCQ disparities were identified for Blacks (AOR 0.38; [95% CI 0.20-0.72]) and Hispanics (AOR 0.39; [95% CI 0.17-0.89]) compared to NHWs. Racial disparities among Black controls and Black prostate cancer survivors remained significant in fully adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diabetes care disparities are evident among cancer survivors and salient among non-cancer controls. Strategies to promote health equity should target specific care indices among survivors and emphasize equitable DCQ strategies among Black and Hispanic communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"3543-3555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Differences in Diabetes Care Quality in A National Sample of Cancer Survivors Relative to Non-Cancer Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Denalee M O'Malley, Sarah Alavi, Jennifer Tsui, Cilgy M Abraham, Pamela Ohman-Strickland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02156-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among cancer survivors, diabetes is associated with greater morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to describe racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes care quality (DCQ) among cancer survivors compared to non-cancer controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component data (2010-2018). Black, non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic respondents diagnosed with diabetes and cancer were frequency matched 1:5 to non-cancer controls. Multivariable logistic regression estimated associations for specific indices and overall DCQ by race/ethnicity stratified by cancer site/status in partially adjusted (not controlling for socioeconomic indicators) and fully adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample of 4775 included cancer survivors (n = 907 all cancers; n = 401 breast; n = 167 colon; n = 339 prostate) and non-cancer controls (n = 3868) matched by age, race/ethnicity, and year. In partially adjusted models, Black (adjusted odds ratio, AOR) 0.67 [95% CI 0.54-0.83]) and Hispanic (AOR 0.68 [95% CI 0.54-0.87]) non-cancer controls had significant disparities for overall DCQ compared to NHWs. Among cancer survivors, DCQ disparities for Black (AOR 0.62, [95% CI 0.4-0.96]) and Hispanics (AOR 0.60, [95% CI 0.38-0.97]) were identified. Among prostate cancer survivors, DCQ disparities were identified for Blacks (AOR 0.38; [95% CI 0.20-0.72]) and Hispanics (AOR 0.39; [95% CI 0.17-0.89]) compared to NHWs. Racial disparities among Black controls and Black prostate cancer survivors remained significant in fully adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diabetes care disparities are evident among cancer survivors and salient among non-cancer controls. Strategies to promote health equity should target specific care indices among survivors and emphasize equitable DCQ strategies among Black and Hispanic communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3543-3555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02156-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02156-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在癌症幸存者中,糖尿病与更高的发病率和死亡率相关。本研究旨在描述与非癌症对照组相比,癌症幸存者在糖尿病护理质量(DCQ)方面的种族/民族差异:我们使用了医疗支出小组调查家庭组件数据(2010-2018 年)。被诊断患有糖尿病和癌症的黑人、非西班牙裔白人(NHW)和西班牙裔受访者与非癌症对照组进行了 1:5 的频率匹配。在部分调整(不控制社会经济指标)和完全调整模型中,多变量逻辑回归估算了按种族/人种、癌症部位/状况分层的特定指数和总体 DCQ 的相关性:最终的 4775 个样本包括癌症幸存者(n = 907 例所有癌症;n = 401 例乳腺癌;n = 167 例结肠癌;n = 339 例前列腺癌)和非癌症对照组(n = 3868 例),年龄、种族/族裔和年份均匹配。在部分调整模型中,黑人(调整赔率比为 0.67 [95% CI 0.54-0.83])和西班牙裔(调整赔率比为 0.68 [95% CI 0.54-0.87])非癌症对照组的整体 DCQ 与 NHW 相比存在显著差异。在癌症幸存者中,黑人(AOR 0.62,[95% CI 0.4-0.96])和西班牙裔(AOR 0.60,[95% CI 0.38-0.97])的 DCQ 存在差异。在前列腺癌幸存者中,黑人(AOR 0.38;[95% CI 0.20-0.72])和西班牙裔(AOR 0.39;[95% CI 0.17-0.89])的 DCQ 与 NHWs 相比存在差异。在完全调整模型中,黑人对照组和黑人前列腺癌幸存者的种族差异仍然显著:结论:在癌症幸存者中存在明显的糖尿病护理差异,在非癌症对照组中也很突出。促进健康公平的策略应针对幸存者中的特定护理指数,并强调黑人和西班牙裔社区的公平DCQ策略。
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Diabetes Care Quality in A National Sample of Cancer Survivors Relative to Non-Cancer Controls.
Background: Among cancer survivors, diabetes is associated with greater morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to describe racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes care quality (DCQ) among cancer survivors compared to non-cancer controls.
Methods: We used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component data (2010-2018). Black, non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic respondents diagnosed with diabetes and cancer were frequency matched 1:5 to non-cancer controls. Multivariable logistic regression estimated associations for specific indices and overall DCQ by race/ethnicity stratified by cancer site/status in partially adjusted (not controlling for socioeconomic indicators) and fully adjusted models.
Results: The final sample of 4775 included cancer survivors (n = 907 all cancers; n = 401 breast; n = 167 colon; n = 339 prostate) and non-cancer controls (n = 3868) matched by age, race/ethnicity, and year. In partially adjusted models, Black (adjusted odds ratio, AOR) 0.67 [95% CI 0.54-0.83]) and Hispanic (AOR 0.68 [95% CI 0.54-0.87]) non-cancer controls had significant disparities for overall DCQ compared to NHWs. Among cancer survivors, DCQ disparities for Black (AOR 0.62, [95% CI 0.4-0.96]) and Hispanics (AOR 0.60, [95% CI 0.38-0.97]) were identified. Among prostate cancer survivors, DCQ disparities were identified for Blacks (AOR 0.38; [95% CI 0.20-0.72]) and Hispanics (AOR 0.39; [95% CI 0.17-0.89]) compared to NHWs. Racial disparities among Black controls and Black prostate cancer survivors remained significant in fully adjusted models.
Conclusion: Diabetes care disparities are evident among cancer survivors and salient among non-cancer controls. Strategies to promote health equity should target specific care indices among survivors and emphasize equitable DCQ strategies among Black and Hispanic communities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.