Lisa L Dinsenbacher, Lukas Imfeld, Fabrice Helfenstein, Julian Moeller, Undine E Lang, Christian G Huber
{"title":"对人格障碍患者进行专门的短期危机干预:对胁迫和住院时间的影响。","authors":"Lisa L Dinsenbacher, Lukas Imfeld, Fabrice Helfenstein, Julian Moeller, Undine E Lang, Christian G Huber","doi":"10.1177/00207640241277161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute crises in patients with personality disorders (PD) are often accompanied by suicidal and self-harming behavior. Their management is challenging, as both coercive measures and prolonged inpatient-treatment are known to be counterproductive. Only in crises that cannot be controlled by outpatient means, inpatient treatment is to be taken into account. This treatment should be time-limited and not involve coercion.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess if the introduction of a specialized crisis intervention track is associated with a reduction of coercive measures as well as a shorter in-hospital stay in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 8-year, hospital-wide, longitudinal, observational study, we investigated the frequency of coercive measures and the median length of in-hospital stay in 1,752 inpatient-cases with PD admitted to the Adult Psychiatry, UPK, Basel, Switzerland, between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2019. By means of an interrupted-time-series analysis, we compared the period before and after the implementation of a specialized crisis intervention track for PD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data show a significant decrease in the median length of in-hospital stay and no significant reduction in the incidence rate of coercion among PD patients after the intervention. The latter is likely due to a floor effect, since there was a significant decrease in coercive measures over the entire observation period, already reaching very low rates before the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study underlines the clinical importance of specialized short-term crisis management in PD, which comes along with shorter lengths of in-hospital stays and a stable low rate of coercive measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1516-1524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specialized short term crisis intervention for patients with personality disorder: Effects on coercion and length of stay.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa L Dinsenbacher, Lukas Imfeld, Fabrice Helfenstein, Julian Moeller, Undine E Lang, Christian G Huber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640241277161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute crises in patients with personality disorders (PD) are often accompanied by suicidal and self-harming behavior. Their management is challenging, as both coercive measures and prolonged inpatient-treatment are known to be counterproductive. Only in crises that cannot be controlled by outpatient means, inpatient treatment is to be taken into account. This treatment should be time-limited and not involve coercion.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess if the introduction of a specialized crisis intervention track is associated with a reduction of coercive measures as well as a shorter in-hospital stay in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 8-year, hospital-wide, longitudinal, observational study, we investigated the frequency of coercive measures and the median length of in-hospital stay in 1,752 inpatient-cases with PD admitted to the Adult Psychiatry, UPK, Basel, Switzerland, between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2019. By means of an interrupted-time-series analysis, we compared the period before and after the implementation of a specialized crisis intervention track for PD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data show a significant decrease in the median length of in-hospital stay and no significant reduction in the incidence rate of coercion among PD patients after the intervention. The latter is likely due to a floor effect, since there was a significant decrease in coercive measures over the entire observation period, already reaching very low rates before the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study underlines the clinical importance of specialized short-term crisis management in PD, which comes along with shorter lengths of in-hospital stays and a stable low rate of coercive measure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1516-1524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241277161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241277161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Specialized short term crisis intervention for patients with personality disorder: Effects on coercion and length of stay.
Background: Acute crises in patients with personality disorders (PD) are often accompanied by suicidal and self-harming behavior. Their management is challenging, as both coercive measures and prolonged inpatient-treatment are known to be counterproductive. Only in crises that cannot be controlled by outpatient means, inpatient treatment is to be taken into account. This treatment should be time-limited and not involve coercion.
Aims: The aim of this study was to assess if the introduction of a specialized crisis intervention track is associated with a reduction of coercive measures as well as a shorter in-hospital stay in PD patients.
Methods: In this 8-year, hospital-wide, longitudinal, observational study, we investigated the frequency of coercive measures and the median length of in-hospital stay in 1,752 inpatient-cases with PD admitted to the Adult Psychiatry, UPK, Basel, Switzerland, between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2019. By means of an interrupted-time-series analysis, we compared the period before and after the implementation of a specialized crisis intervention track for PD patients.
Results: Our data show a significant decrease in the median length of in-hospital stay and no significant reduction in the incidence rate of coercion among PD patients after the intervention. The latter is likely due to a floor effect, since there was a significant decrease in coercive measures over the entire observation period, already reaching very low rates before the intervention.
Conclusions: Our study underlines the clinical importance of specialized short-term crisis management in PD, which comes along with shorter lengths of in-hospital stays and a stable low rate of coercive measure.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities.
Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas.
The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.