Huzaifa Ul Haq Ansari, Farea Noman Dar, Narmeen Shaikh, Ayesha Noman, Kamran Ahmed, Uzair Asad, Khansa Khalid, Moiz Ahmed, Ahmad Zakarya, Usman Leel, Ruhina Adil Shaikh, Kiran Abbas
{"title":"在不同亚人群中,完全血运重建与单纯罪魁祸首血运重建对主要不良心血管事件的影响。","authors":"Huzaifa Ul Haq Ansari, Farea Noman Dar, Narmeen Shaikh, Ayesha Noman, Kamran Ahmed, Uzair Asad, Khansa Khalid, Moiz Ahmed, Ahmad Zakarya, Usman Leel, Ruhina Adil Shaikh, Kiran Abbas","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2024.2387516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Myocardial infarction management relies on pharmaceuticals and interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While complete PCI has shown noninferiority to culprit-only PCI, its impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) outcomes in multiple subpopulations has been unknown.<b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search (from January 2000 to May 2024) identified four relevant randomized controlled trials involving ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Data analysis employed a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting.<b>Results:</b> MACE risk was significantly lower in males than females undergoing complete PCI compared with culprit-only PCI (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.39-0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.01; I2 = 53%). Furthermore, complete PCI significantly lowered the risk of MACE outcomes in patients without diabetes and in patients under the 65-year age limit in comparison to culprit-only PCI.<b>Conclusion:</b> Complete PCI reduces MACE risk in male, nondiabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients under 65 with multivessel coronary artery disease, necessitating further investigation into outcome differences among different subpopulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of complete versus culprit-only revascularization on major adverse cardiovascular event in diverse subpopulations.\",\"authors\":\"Huzaifa Ul Haq Ansari, Farea Noman Dar, Narmeen Shaikh, Ayesha Noman, Kamran Ahmed, Uzair Asad, Khansa Khalid, Moiz Ahmed, Ahmad Zakarya, Usman Leel, Ruhina Adil Shaikh, Kiran Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2024.2387516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Myocardial infarction management relies on pharmaceuticals and interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While complete PCI has shown noninferiority to culprit-only PCI, its impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) outcomes in multiple subpopulations has been unknown.<b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search (from January 2000 to May 2024) identified four relevant randomized controlled trials involving ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Data analysis employed a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting.<b>Results:</b> MACE risk was significantly lower in males than females undergoing complete PCI compared with culprit-only PCI (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.39-0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.01; I2 = 53%). Furthermore, complete PCI significantly lowered the risk of MACE outcomes in patients without diabetes and in patients under the 65-year age limit in comparison to culprit-only PCI.<b>Conclusion:</b> Complete PCI reduces MACE risk in male, nondiabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients under 65 with multivessel coronary artery disease, necessitating further investigation into outcome differences among different subpopulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520548/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2387516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2387516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of complete versus culprit-only revascularization on major adverse cardiovascular event in diverse subpopulations.
Background: Myocardial infarction management relies on pharmaceuticals and interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While complete PCI has shown noninferiority to culprit-only PCI, its impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) outcomes in multiple subpopulations has been unknown.Methods: A systematic literature search (from January 2000 to May 2024) identified four relevant randomized controlled trials involving ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Data analysis employed a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting.Results: MACE risk was significantly lower in males than females undergoing complete PCI compared with culprit-only PCI (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.39-0.68; p < 0.01; I2 = 53%). Furthermore, complete PCI significantly lowered the risk of MACE outcomes in patients without diabetes and in patients under the 65-year age limit in comparison to culprit-only PCI.Conclusion: Complete PCI reduces MACE risk in male, nondiabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients under 65 with multivessel coronary artery disease, necessitating further investigation into outcome differences among different subpopulations.
期刊介绍:
Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.