疟疾 Rapigen 快速诊断检测的分析敏感性分析和临床影响建模。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Allison Golden, Hannah C Slater, Ihn Kyung Jang, Sayali Walke, Thanh T Phan, Greg T Bizilj, Andrew Rashid, Rebecca Barney, Smita Das, Melissa J Rist, James S McCarthy, Francois Nosten, Jordi Landier, Mallika Imwong, Jennifer C C Hume, Issaka Sagara, Sara A Healy, Patrick E Duffy, Henry Ntuku, Davis Mumbengegwi, Michelle S Hsiang, Sean C Murphy, John Rek, Katherine Torres, Dionicia Gamboa, Gonzalo J Domingo
{"title":"疟疾 Rapigen 快速诊断检测的分析敏感性分析和临床影响建模。","authors":"Allison Golden, Hannah C Slater, Ihn Kyung Jang, Sayali Walke, Thanh T Phan, Greg T Bizilj, Andrew Rashid, Rebecca Barney, Smita Das, Melissa J Rist, James S McCarthy, Francois Nosten, Jordi Landier, Mallika Imwong, Jennifer C C Hume, Issaka Sagara, Sara A Healy, Patrick E Duffy, Henry Ntuku, Davis Mumbengegwi, Michelle S Hsiang, Sean C Murphy, John Rek, Katherine Torres, Dionicia Gamboa, Gonzalo J Domingo","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laboratory benchmarking allows objective analysis of the analytical performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We present the analytical detection limits of the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII), and two best-in-class WHO-prequalified comparator RDTs, generated using standardized panels containing recombinant antigen, in vitro cultured parasites, international standards, and clinical samples. Detection limit antigen concentrations of HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH were determined for the Rapigen and comparator RDTs. Detection of antigens in international units (IU)/mL was also evaluated. The Rapigen Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII) detected 3.9 and 3.9 IU/mL for PfLDH and HRP2, respectively, and the Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) detected 3.9 and 5.0 IU/mL for PfLDH and PvLDH, respectively. The comparator HRP2/PfLDH and HRP2/PvLDH detected 15.6 and 31.3 IU/mL for HRP2 and PfLDH and 15.6 and 50.0 IU/mL for HRP2 and PvLDH, respectively. The RDT clinical sensitivity was predicted through application of analytical detection limits to antigen concentration distributions from clinical symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Febrile cases would be detected in a majority by both standard and Rapigen RDTs, but incremental increases in sensitivity in the Rapigen RDTs may be important for clinical cases currently missed by microscopy. Rapigen RDTs were predicted to have improved detection of asymptomatic cases and infections with parasites carrying hrp2 deletions through more sensitive PfLDH detection. Through the benchmarking and simulation of clinical sensitivity, a method for rapidly assessing the ability of new RDTs to meet clinical needs using high-sensitivity antigen distribution data is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Golden, Hannah C Slater, Ihn Kyung Jang, Sayali Walke, Thanh T Phan, Greg T Bizilj, Andrew Rashid, Rebecca Barney, Smita Das, Melissa J Rist, James S McCarthy, Francois Nosten, Jordi Landier, Mallika Imwong, Jennifer C C Hume, Issaka Sagara, Sara A Healy, Patrick E Duffy, Henry Ntuku, Davis Mumbengegwi, Michelle S Hsiang, Sean C Murphy, John Rek, Katherine Torres, Dionicia Gamboa, Gonzalo J Domingo\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Laboratory benchmarking allows objective analysis of the analytical performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We present the analytical detection limits of the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII), and two best-in-class WHO-prequalified comparator RDTs, generated using standardized panels containing recombinant antigen, in vitro cultured parasites, international standards, and clinical samples. Detection limit antigen concentrations of HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH were determined for the Rapigen and comparator RDTs. Detection of antigens in international units (IU)/mL was also evaluated. The Rapigen Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII) detected 3.9 and 3.9 IU/mL for PfLDH and HRP2, respectively, and the Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) detected 3.9 and 5.0 IU/mL for PfLDH and PvLDH, respectively. The comparator HRP2/PfLDH and HRP2/PvLDH detected 15.6 and 31.3 IU/mL for HRP2 and PfLDH and 15.6 and 50.0 IU/mL for HRP2 and PvLDH, respectively. The RDT clinical sensitivity was predicted through application of analytical detection limits to antigen concentration distributions from clinical symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Febrile cases would be detected in a majority by both standard and Rapigen RDTs, but incremental increases in sensitivity in the Rapigen RDTs may be important for clinical cases currently missed by microscopy. Rapigen RDTs were predicted to have improved detection of asymptomatic cases and infections with parasites carrying hrp2 deletions through more sensitive PfLDH detection. Through the benchmarking and simulation of clinical sensitivity, a method for rapidly assessing the ability of new RDTs to meet clinical needs using high-sensitivity antigen distribution data is presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过制定实验室基准,可以对疟疾快速诊断检测试剂盒(RDT)的分析性能进行客观分析。我们介绍了 Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH)、Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII)和两种世界卫生组织预认证的同类最佳比较型 RDT 的分析检测限,这些检测限是使用包含重组抗原、体外培养寄生虫、国际标准和临床样本的标准化面板生成的。确定了 Rapigen 和对比 RDT 的 HRP2、PfLDH 和 PvLDH 的检测限抗原浓度。还以国际单位 (IU)/mL 为单位对抗原的检测进行了评估。Rapigen Ag Pf(pLDH/HRPII)对PfLDH和HRP2的检测分别为3.9和3.9 IU/mL,Ag Pf/Pv(pLDH/pLDH)对PfLDH和PvLDH的检测分别为3.9和5.0 IU/mL。比较方案 HRP2/PfLDH 和 HRP2/PvLDH 检测出的 HRP2 和 PfLDH 分别为 15.6 和 31.3 IU/mL,HRP2 和 PvLDH 分别为 15.6 和 50.0 IU/mL。通过将分析检测限应用于临床有症状和无症状病例的抗原浓度分布,预测了 RDT 的临床灵敏度。标准 RDT 和 Rapigen RDT 都能检测出大多数发热病例,但 Rapigen RDT 灵敏度的递增可能对目前显微镜检查漏检的临床病例很重要。据预测,Rapigen 快速检测试剂盒可通过更灵敏的 PfLDH 检测,提高对无症状病例和携带 hrp2 缺失的寄生虫感染的检测率。通过对临床灵敏度进行基准测试和模拟,介绍了一种利用高灵敏度抗原分布数据快速评估新型 RDT 满足临床需求的能力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria.

Laboratory benchmarking allows objective analysis of the analytical performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We present the analytical detection limits of the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII), and two best-in-class WHO-prequalified comparator RDTs, generated using standardized panels containing recombinant antigen, in vitro cultured parasites, international standards, and clinical samples. Detection limit antigen concentrations of HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH were determined for the Rapigen and comparator RDTs. Detection of antigens in international units (IU)/mL was also evaluated. The Rapigen Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII) detected 3.9 and 3.9 IU/mL for PfLDH and HRP2, respectively, and the Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) detected 3.9 and 5.0 IU/mL for PfLDH and PvLDH, respectively. The comparator HRP2/PfLDH and HRP2/PvLDH detected 15.6 and 31.3 IU/mL for HRP2 and PfLDH and 15.6 and 50.0 IU/mL for HRP2 and PvLDH, respectively. The RDT clinical sensitivity was predicted through application of analytical detection limits to antigen concentration distributions from clinical symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Febrile cases would be detected in a majority by both standard and Rapigen RDTs, but incremental increases in sensitivity in the Rapigen RDTs may be important for clinical cases currently missed by microscopy. Rapigen RDTs were predicted to have improved detection of asymptomatic cases and infections with parasites carrying hrp2 deletions through more sensitive PfLDH detection. Through the benchmarking and simulation of clinical sensitivity, a method for rapidly assessing the ability of new RDTs to meet clinical needs using high-sensitivity antigen distribution data is presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信