Alison H Chang, Frank W Roemer, Ali Guermazi, Orit Almagor, Jungwha Julia Lee, Joan S Chmiel, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Jing Song, Leena Sharma
{"title":"现有的膝关节骨性关节炎 MRI 定义是否能识别出在长达 11 年的随访中会出现临床重大疾病的膝关节?","authors":"Alison H Chang, Frank W Roemer, Ali Guermazi, Orit Almagor, Jungwha Julia Lee, Joan S Chmiel, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Jing Song, Leena Sharma","doi":"10.1002/art.42982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In individuals without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA), we investigated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined knee OA at baseline was associated with incident radiographic and symptomatic disease during up to 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Osteoarthritis Initiative participants without tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA at baseline were assessed for MRI-based tibiofemoral cartilage damage, osteophyte presence, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage/extrusion. We defined MRI knee OA using alternative, reported definitions (Def A and Def B). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), and frequent knee symptoms (Sx) were assessed at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-, 8-, and 10/11-year follow-up visits. Incident tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA (outcome) was defined as (1) KL ≥2, (2) KL ≥2 and JSN, or (3) KL ≥2 and Sx. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations of baseline MRI-defined knee OA (Def A and Def B) with incident outcomes during up to 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,621 participants (mean age ± SD 58.8 ± 9.0 years, mean body mass index ± SD 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 59.5% women), 17% had MRI-defined knee OA by Def A and 24% by Def B. Baseline MRI-defined knee OA was associated with incident KL ≥2 (odds ratio 2.94 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.34-3.68] for Def A and 2.44 [95% CI 1.97-3.03] for Def B). However, a substantial proportion of individuals with baseline MRI-defined knee OA did not develop incident KL ≥2 during follow-up (59% for Def A and 64% for Def B). Findings were similar for the other two outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current MRI definitions of knee OA do not adequately identify knees that will develop radiographic and symptomatic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Existing MRI Definitions of Knee Osteoarthritis Identify Knees That Will Develop Clinically Significant Disease Over Up To 11 Years of Follow-Up?\",\"authors\":\"Alison H Chang, Frank W Roemer, Ali Guermazi, Orit Almagor, Jungwha Julia Lee, Joan S Chmiel, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Jing Song, Leena Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/art.42982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In individuals without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA), we investigated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined knee OA at baseline was associated with incident radiographic and symptomatic disease during up to 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Osteoarthritis Initiative participants without tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA at baseline were assessed for MRI-based tibiofemoral cartilage damage, osteophyte presence, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage/extrusion. We defined MRI knee OA using alternative, reported definitions (Def A and Def B). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), and frequent knee symptoms (Sx) were assessed at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-, 8-, and 10/11-year follow-up visits. Incident tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA (outcome) was defined as (1) KL ≥2, (2) KL ≥2 and JSN, or (3) KL ≥2 and Sx. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations of baseline MRI-defined knee OA (Def A and Def B) with incident outcomes during up to 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,621 participants (mean age ± SD 58.8 ± 9.0 years, mean body mass index ± SD 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 59.5% women), 17% had MRI-defined knee OA by Def A and 24% by Def B. Baseline MRI-defined knee OA was associated with incident KL ≥2 (odds ratio 2.94 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.34-3.68] for Def A and 2.44 [95% CI 1.97-3.03] for Def B). However, a substantial proportion of individuals with baseline MRI-defined knee OA did not develop incident KL ≥2 during follow-up (59% for Def A and 64% for Def B). Findings were similar for the other two outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current MRI definitions of knee OA do not adequately identify knees that will develop radiographic and symptomatic disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42982\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42982","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do Existing MRI Definitions of Knee Osteoarthritis Identify Knees That Will Develop Clinically Significant Disease Over Up To 11 Years of Follow-Up?
Objective: In individuals without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA), we investigated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined knee OA at baseline was associated with incident radiographic and symptomatic disease during up to 11 years of follow-up.
Methods: Osteoarthritis Initiative participants without tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA at baseline were assessed for MRI-based tibiofemoral cartilage damage, osteophyte presence, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage/extrusion. We defined MRI knee OA using alternative, reported definitions (Def A and Def B). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), and frequent knee symptoms (Sx) were assessed at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-, 8-, and 10/11-year follow-up visits. Incident tibiofemoral radiographic knee OA (outcome) was defined as (1) KL ≥2, (2) KL ≥2 and JSN, or (3) KL ≥2 and Sx. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations of baseline MRI-defined knee OA (Def A and Def B) with incident outcomes during up to 11 years of follow-up.
Results: Among 1,621 participants (mean age ± SD 58.8 ± 9.0 years, mean body mass index ± SD 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, 59.5% women), 17% had MRI-defined knee OA by Def A and 24% by Def B. Baseline MRI-defined knee OA was associated with incident KL ≥2 (odds ratio 2.94 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.34-3.68] for Def A and 2.44 [95% CI 1.97-3.03] for Def B). However, a substantial proportion of individuals with baseline MRI-defined knee OA did not develop incident KL ≥2 during follow-up (59% for Def A and 64% for Def B). Findings were similar for the other two outcomes.
Conclusion: Current MRI definitions of knee OA do not adequately identify knees that will develop radiographic and symptomatic disease.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.