抑制可塑性支持海马中的重放泛化

IF 21.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Zhenrui Liao, Satoshi Terada, Ivan Georgiev Raikov, Darian Hadjiabadi, Miklos Szoboszlay, Ivan Soltesz, Attila Losonczy
{"title":"抑制可塑性支持海马中的重放泛化","authors":"Zhenrui Liao, Satoshi Terada, Ivan Georgiev Raikov, Darian Hadjiabadi, Miklos Szoboszlay, Ivan Soltesz, Attila Losonczy","doi":"10.1038/s41593-024-01745-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memory consolidation assimilates recent experiences into long-term memory. This process requires the replay of learned sequences, although the content of these sequences remains controversial. Recent work has shown that the statistics of replay deviate from those of experience: stimuli that are experientially salient may be either recruited or suppressed from sharp-wave ripples. In this study, we found that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike-time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using models at three levels of abstraction—leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed and abstract binary—we show that this rule enables efficient generalization, and we make specific predictions about the consequences of intact and perturbed inhibitory dynamics for network dynamics and cognition. Finally, we use optogenetics to artificially implant non-generalizable representations into the network in awake behaving mice, and we find that these representations also accumulate inhibition during sharp-wave ripples, experimentally validating a major prediction of our model. Our work outlines a potential direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, with implications for both normal learning and neurological disease. The study of neural plasticity has focused on excitatory neural connections, but inhibitory connections can also change. Learning at inhibitory synapses may support high-level cognitive phenomena, such as selecting information for memory storage.","PeriodicalId":19076,"journal":{"name":"Nature neuroscience","volume":"27 10","pages":"1987-1998"},"PeriodicalIF":21.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhibitory plasticity supports replay generalization in the hippocampus\",\"authors\":\"Zhenrui Liao, Satoshi Terada, Ivan Georgiev Raikov, Darian Hadjiabadi, Miklos Szoboszlay, Ivan Soltesz, Attila Losonczy\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41593-024-01745-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Memory consolidation assimilates recent experiences into long-term memory. This process requires the replay of learned sequences, although the content of these sequences remains controversial. Recent work has shown that the statistics of replay deviate from those of experience: stimuli that are experientially salient may be either recruited or suppressed from sharp-wave ripples. In this study, we found that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike-time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using models at three levels of abstraction—leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed and abstract binary—we show that this rule enables efficient generalization, and we make specific predictions about the consequences of intact and perturbed inhibitory dynamics for network dynamics and cognition. Finally, we use optogenetics to artificially implant non-generalizable representations into the network in awake behaving mice, and we find that these representations also accumulate inhibition during sharp-wave ripples, experimentally validating a major prediction of our model. Our work outlines a potential direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, with implications for both normal learning and neurological disease. The study of neural plasticity has focused on excitatory neural connections, but inhibitory connections can also change. Learning at inhibitory synapses may support high-level cognitive phenomena, such as selecting information for memory storage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"1987-1998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01745-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01745-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

记忆巩固将最近的经验同化到长期记忆中。这一过程需要重放已学过的序列,尽管这些序列的内容仍存在争议。最近的研究表明,重放的统计量与经验的统计量存在偏差:经验中突出的刺激可能会被锐波涟漪吸收或抑制。在这项研究中,我们发现这种现象可以用抑制性突触的海比尖峰时间可塑性规则来解释,而且在生物学上是合理的。通过使用三个抽象层次的模型--"泄漏-整合-发射"、"生物物理细节 "和 "抽象二元"--我们证明了这一规则能够实现有效的泛化,并对网络动力学和认知的抑制动态的完整和扰动后果做出了具体预测。最后,我们利用光遗传学将非泛化表征人为植入清醒行为小鼠的网络中,我们发现这些表征也会在尖波涟漪期间积累抑制,从而在实验中验证了我们模型的一个主要预测。我们的工作概述了记忆巩固的突触和认知水平之间的潜在直接联系,对正常学习和神经疾病都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inhibitory plasticity supports replay generalization in the hippocampus

Inhibitory plasticity supports replay generalization in the hippocampus

Inhibitory plasticity supports replay generalization in the hippocampus
Memory consolidation assimilates recent experiences into long-term memory. This process requires the replay of learned sequences, although the content of these sequences remains controversial. Recent work has shown that the statistics of replay deviate from those of experience: stimuli that are experientially salient may be either recruited or suppressed from sharp-wave ripples. In this study, we found that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike-time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using models at three levels of abstraction—leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed and abstract binary—we show that this rule enables efficient generalization, and we make specific predictions about the consequences of intact and perturbed inhibitory dynamics for network dynamics and cognition. Finally, we use optogenetics to artificially implant non-generalizable representations into the network in awake behaving mice, and we find that these representations also accumulate inhibition during sharp-wave ripples, experimentally validating a major prediction of our model. Our work outlines a potential direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, with implications for both normal learning and neurological disease. The study of neural plasticity has focused on excitatory neural connections, but inhibitory connections can also change. Learning at inhibitory synapses may support high-level cognitive phenomena, such as selecting information for memory storage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature neuroscience
Nature neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
38.60
自引率
1.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Neuroscience, a multidisciplinary journal, publishes papers of the utmost quality and significance across all realms of neuroscience. The editors welcome contributions spanning molecular, cellular, systems, and cognitive neuroscience, along with psychophysics, computational modeling, and nervous system disorders. While no area is off-limits, studies offering fundamental insights into nervous system function receive priority. The journal offers high visibility to both readers and authors, fostering interdisciplinary communication and accessibility to a broad audience. It maintains high standards of copy editing and production, rigorous peer review, rapid publication, and operates independently from academic societies and other vested interests. In addition to primary research, Nature Neuroscience features news and views, reviews, editorials, commentaries, perspectives, book reviews, and correspondence, aiming to serve as the voice of the global neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信